Administrative Policies To Fight Terrorism Research Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
977
Cite

Administrative Policies to Fight Terrorism Since the 9/11 attacks during the year 2001, the United States has faced significant changes not only in the personal and emotional lives of its citizens, but also in terms of its security measures. Indeed, many citizens have suffered significant losses of freedom and rights in the name of national security. Furthermore, many citizens suffer these losses willingly, believing the government-imposed statements regarding that these are (ironically) necessary in order to preserve the very freedoms citizens are giving up. Being emotionally charged, citizens do not think either rationally or critically about the freedom that they are giving up in order to preserve a way of life that the government is systematically destroying by means of its policies. Furthermore, the new national security policies have also targeted persons that the government has profiled as possible terrorist. Most notably, these persons are generally Arab and/or Muslim in ethnic and religious heritage.

A find myself rather in agreement with critics such as Mark Weisbrot (2001), who hold that the latest atrocities that the government has committed in the name of the "war on terrorism" is just one in a string of many worldwide. Indeed, through its actions and foreign policy, the United States government has created for itself many enemies around the globe to such an extent that Osama Bin Laden is merely a convenient name among the many to blame for 9/11. Indeed, according to Weisbrot, the government has refused to meet with the Taliban for...

...

This is particularly true in the criminal justice system. Many critics of the government has shown our leaders' policies to be fundamentally flawed and self-serving. It is therefore a challenge to find ways in which to effectively combat terrorism within the borders of the United States, even while members of the American military are dying in the government's war in Iraq.
I do not however believe that the matter is hopeless. The criminal justice system is one of the fundamental elements that ensure to the citizens of the country the freedoms and rights that the country has been known for since its birth. In order to continue ensuring these rights, the criminal justice system can establish policies and procedures to ensure that all citizens, regardless of race, religion, or any other divider, receives the rights due to them when they enter the system.

Weisbrot, again in considering the government, suggests that the reasons for terrorism need to be established before a targeted policy can be issued. After 9/11, it appears that the government, and indeed the criminal justice system, succumbed to the general hysteria experienced throughout the country. The situation can be compared to a group of children who has experienced something traumatic: emotion overrides everything else. And the government shrewdly used nationwide hysteria to advance its own agenda.

The first step…

Sources Used in Documents:

Sources

Thompson, Larry D. (2003, Oct 12). Terrorism and the U.S. Criminal Justice System. Brookings. http://www.brookings.edu/speeches/2003/1012terrorism_thompson.aspx

Weisbrot, Mark (2001, Sept 22). To Prevent Terrorism, U.S. Foreign Policy Must Change. Common Dreams News Center. http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0922-09.htm


Cite this Document:

"Administrative Policies To Fight Terrorism" (2007, December 13) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/administrative-policies-to-fight-terrorism-73561

"Administrative Policies To Fight Terrorism" 13 December 2007. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/administrative-policies-to-fight-terrorism-73561>

"Administrative Policies To Fight Terrorism", 13 December 2007, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/administrative-policies-to-fight-terrorism-73561

Related Documents

At times terrorist succeed and at times they fail. Some times they have larger and long-term goal and some times they have short-term aims. For example, a group hijacking a plane wanted some immediate results like release of the prisoners or financial gain but blowing a plane into a building would definitely mean that terrorists wanted something big out of it. Sometimes terrorists want to just cause panic and

Terrorism in Seattle Even before the World Trade Center attack in September, 2011, most major cities in the United States were not only aware, but anticipatory regarding the potential for a terrorist attack. Seattle has been fortunate in that it has never experienced an actual international attack, but has had three major domestic incidents since 1999 that continue to be in the minds of Emergency Management professionals. In 1999, Ahmed Ressam,

Simply put, the September 11th attacks would never have occurred without the prior development of the group's worldwide infrastructure, which consists of truly billions of dollars to establish and maintain (Ehrenfeld, 2003). Enormous amounts of money have been spent on recruitment, training camps, purchasing weapons, training on weapons, creating unconventional weapons, gathering intelligence, promoting Islamist propaganda and other activities (Ehrenfeld, 2003). The Last Five Years One of the things that the

Counterterrorism and Intelligence Framework Terrorism has been the greatest threat to American soil since the end of the Cold War, and the country has responded to these threats by creating an elaborate counterterrorism and intelligence framework. This counterterrorism strategy must use every possible tool in America's arsenal, and must meet the highest standards in excellence for the duty it is tasked to perform. The nature of terrorist threats in America in

This means that these groups, despite their different goals and agendas, are often left with no choice but to engage in terrorist activities. The normal course of action has failed and will fail and as marginalized from the normal institutions that govern, a more direct and violent approach is necessary. Lacking the political, technological, and popular support to engage in a real war, terrorism allows for a few who are on the outside to become increasingly

For instance, Islamic terrorism completely rejects western values and cultures. Terrorist groups from Africa are also fighting if not the troops of the former colonial powers, at least the cultural reminiscences of their presence on the Black continent. Therefore, it can be said that modern terrorism tends to draw from the cultural and civilization differences present at the moment in the world and predicted by Huntington. There have been numerous