Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Paradox of Thrift: Discussion
The 'paradox of thrift' in basic terms observes "that attempts to increase saving, by reducing spending and aggregate demand, may lower output and national income so much that the actual ex-post savings end up being smaller than at the onset" (Berglund and Vernengo, 2006, p.149). I fully concur with the reasoning behind this theory. In most cases, people believe that saving is a virtue. Therefore, whenever they can, people will always try to put aside some cash "for a rainy day." However, it is important to note that when this is done en masse, the consequences for the entire economy could be dire. This is more so the case when there is a downturn in economic activity and as a result, people panic and increase their savings.
To begin with, when people/consumers increase their savings, they inevitably decrease their spending. In such a case, businesses face a sustained decrease in revenues. To remain relevant in the face of decreased revenues, affected businesses embrace various strategies including but not limited to expense/cost reduction measures such as...
Businesses in such a case could also cut down on their investments. This is what those who agree with the 'paradox of thrift' argue could end up worsening a recession. According to Dransfield and Dransfield (2003), this particular paradox was proposed by J.M. Keynes -- a popular economist whose macroeconomic ideas continue to be relevant to date. Keynes was convinced that consumer spending was a good thing as it led to enhanced incomes. To him, what consumers spent trickled down as income to various workers employed by business entities and for this reason, reduced spending would deny business entities sufficient revenues to either hire more workers or sustain their relationship with existing workers. The subsequent layoffs and decreased investment into other business opportunities would in the end erode the ability of the people to save.
It should however be noted that the 'paradox of thrift' has in the past been disputed by those who do not necessarily have the same point-of-view as Keynes. It would be prudent to recognize their views. Some of those opposed to the paradox are…
References
Berglund, P.G. & Vernengo, M. (Eds.). (2006). The Means to Prosperity: Fiscal Policy Reconsidered. New York, NY: Routledge.
Boyes, W.J. & Melvin, M. (2010). Economics (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Dransfield, R. & Dransfield, D. (2003). Key Ideas in Economics. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Vermann, E.K. (2012). Wait, Is Saving Good or Bad? The Paradox of Thrift. Economics Newsletter, May, 2012. Retrieved from: http://research.stlouisfed.org/pageone-economics/uploads/newsletter/2012/PageOne0512_Paradox_of_Thrift.pdf
Paradox of Thrift: ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ talks about how the global economy has been acting in somewhat unpredictable ways within the last year. As national economies work more and more together (becoming more integrated), the economies of individual countries are gradually being more influenced by the economic forces around the world. He predicts difficult times ahead if adjustments aren't made soon. He uses John Maynard Keynes' work
Heart Darkness The Postcolonial Landscape in Heart of Darkness Published in 1899, the novella Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad is to this date described as an absolutely critical text in expanding the scholarly discourse on colonialism and its inherently related forces of racism, exploitation and ethnocentrism. By its intent, one finds a text that delivers an unflinching portrayal of the clearly abusive, unethical and racially-justified atrocities fueled by both the greed
Keynesian Theory Neoclassical economists are naturally more reluctant than Keynesians to concede that capitalism as a system might be dysfunctional or that markets might be irrational and inefficient, leading to cycles of boom and bust, mass poverty and unemployment, which happened in the 1930s and is happening again today. One of the main assumptions in the classical model is 'full employed equilibrium' or in other words 'absence of involuntary unemployment.' The
Constitutional Amendments Effective strategies after the 13th and 14th amendments The 13th amendment to the constitution was widely welcome by many Americans and the world at large as it gave the surety of freedom from slavery in the legal standing of it. The most famous and important section of the Declaration of Independence read that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
Savings and Income Decline as People Increase the Saving Habit Saving refers to the income not spent by the consumer. In other words, savings are the money left when the consumer expenditures are subtracted from the disposable incomes that an individual earns over a given period. (Credo, 2006). When analyzing private and public savings, the savings refer to the sum of the public and private saving. (Credo, 2015). While private
Macroeconomics Models The Classical Model (1776-1935) The classical model largely follows the conclusions reached in Microeconomics. The fundamental equilibrium is in the supply and demand for labor. The Demand for Labor and Labor Supply, Income Taxes, and Transfer Payments are the major microeconomic references in the Classic Economic Models (Hicks and Keynes, 1937). Keynesian Models (1936-1969) The simple keynesian model, a greatly oversimplified view of the economy, constructs an equilibrium without referring to the