Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Financial Analysis
Target's working capital in 2005 was as follows:
8,220 = $5,702 and in 2006 it was 14,405 -- 9588 = $4,817. For 2004 the working capital was $4,638. These figures indicate that the working capital totals for Target were inconsistent.
The current ratio for Target for 2005 was as follows:
13,922 / 8220 = 1.69 and for 2006 it was 14,405 / 9588 = 1.50. For 2004 it was 1.55.
The asset turnover for 2004 was as follows:
$42,025 / 29,841.5 = 1.41. For 2005 the asset turnover was:
$46,839 / $31,854.5 = 1.47. For 2006 the asset turnover was:
$52,620 / $33,644 = 1.56
Overall, Target is a healthy company. It has strong liquidity and its operations indicate good efficiency that is improving over time. These characteristics make Target a good investment. However, it is important to consider the investment alternatives, in particular companies that are close competitors. A comparable company for Target is Wal-Mart. The working capital for Wal-Mart is much larger since the company is much larger. The absolute value represented by the working capital is largely irrelevant for comparison between two different firms because of the different sizes of the firms. Current ratio is the better measure to compare between two different firms. Wal-Mart's current ratios for 2004-2006 were 1.70, 1.69 and 1.62 respectively. Target's current ratio over these three years was inconsistent, and Wal-Mart's declined. Target's was generally the weaker of the two.
Wal-Mart's asset turnover for 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively was 2.58, 2.49 and 2.39 based on the following calculations:
2004: 256,329 / 99,152.5 = 2.58
2005: 281,488 / 112,979.5 = 2.49
2006: 308,945 / 129,170.5 = 2.39
Target's figures showed improvement over the three years in this area, but the figures are much lower than those of Wal-Mart. Thus, even though Wal-Mart's numbers are declining, they are stronger than Target's.
I would not invest in Target. The evidence presented here indicates that Target is not as good an investment as its close competitor Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart's working capital indicates that the company has a much larger size than does Target. While Target's figures for current ratio and asset turnover are perfectly healthy numbers, they are inferior to those of Wal-Mart. It could be argued that Target has the better trend with respect to asset turnover, however, improvements should be expected when the firm underperforms. Wal-Mart's track record of superior performance is only slightly diminished by the shrinking spread between its asset turnover and that of Target. Overall, Wal-Mart's financials are almost entirely superior to those of Target. While Target would not make a bad investment, Wal-Mart would be a better one.
Financial Analysis of Wal Mart Financial Analysis of Wal-Mart Company Overview Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) is the largest global retail and chain stores operating in various formats. The company operates more than 8000 stores globally across its business segments, which include electronics, groceries, apparel, and small appliances. Although, Wal-Mart operates a global business, however, more than half of the company businesses are located in the United States. Wal-Mart also operates its global businesses
Financial Analysis of Bestwish Limited Company Overview Bestwish Limited produces extensive range of quality products such as gift dressing, greetings cards, and plush merchandise of more than 50,000 stocks. The production of different categories of products involve between 2 and 15 processes. The company produces standardized products and custom designed products ordered from customers on contract basis. However, Bestwish Limited is facing challenges to control the costs because of varying production process,
92%. This compares to the 0.36% for its peers last year and 17.42% over five years for the sector. UHS has a net profit margin of 3.86% and a five-year average net profit margin of 4.49%. The sector averaged a net profit margin of -0.38% last year, but has a five-year average of 12.27%. What this indicates is that historically UHS has lagged its peers in terms of bottom line
This was able to guarantee the company a steady and sustainable growth, encouraging a constant profitability over this period of time. Further more, the company is well-known for its principles of improving its performances and attempting to be more efficient in everything it does. Throughout its existence, the American retailer has focused on implementing information technology techniques in almost all its activities as the common belief was that automatization drives
Financial Accounting JD Wetherspoon is one of the largest pubcos in Britain, with 880 properties, and had annual turnover last year of ?1.409 billion (Yahoo! Finance, 2015). The company competes with a cost leadership strategy, something that should be reflected on its income statement. It seeks to undercut competitors using its economies of scale in purchasing, and other cost-saving techniques, ranging from zero guaranteed hours for 80% of its workforce to
Superior Living Working capital is the current assets less the current liabilities (Kennon, 2012). The working capital is an important metric because it can have a significant effect on the company's short- and long-term decision making. The working capital is affected by the cash position, the inventories and the receivables, along with the short-term liabilities. The current ratio is simply the working capital in ratio format, the current assets divided by