Financial Analysis The Current Ratios Term Paper

Retained earnings can be defined as earnings that are "retained by the company to be reinvested in its core business or to pay debt," basically, a form of not paying out dividend to the shareholders and reinvesting profit. Retained earnings amount for 65.1% of total asset value, a similar proportion as the one in 2003. Retained earnings play the same role at Polaris as well. In 2004, these amounted up to 46.2% of total asset value. On the Polaris 2004 balance sheet, on the other hand, the retained earnings are accounted for as shareholders' equity.

As a conclusion in terms of debt usage, both companies use no or almost no long-term bank debts to finance their activity and there is no financial leverage worth analyzing. In both cases, the shareholders' equity (processed as retained earnings) amount to 40-50% of the total liabilities value.

We will be using three ratios to assess the companies' profitability: the gross profit margin ratio, the return on assets ratio and the return on equity ratio.

The gross profit margin ratio is calculated as (Sales - Cost of Goods Sold)/Sales and is perhaps the best measure of the company's profitability in terms of sales.

At Arctic,...

...

At Polaris, the gross profit margin was 23.9% in 2004 and 23.4% in 2003. As we can see from the above figures, the gross profit margins are comparative for the two companies and variations are minimal to the precedent year.
The return on assets is calculated by dividing net income by the total assets value. The return on assets was 13.1% in 2004 for Polaris, with 16.5% in 2003. We can observe a 3.4% difference in the return on assets here and this can be explained by noticing that the total assets value increased with over 18%, while the net income actually decreased in value. This means that the newly acquired assets have not yet begun to generate income from their activity.

At Arctic, the return on assets was 10.6% in 2004 and 11.8% in 2003. The slight decrease in Arctic's return on assets value can bear the same explanation as in Polaris's case: net income decreased, while the total assets value has actually increased over this period.

The return on equity value will actually measure the amount of profitability that the shareholder obtains from the company. It is calculated by dividing the net income

Sources Used in Documents:

The return on assets is calculated by dividing net income by the total assets value. The return on assets was 13.1% in 2004 for Polaris, with 16.5% in 2003. We can observe a 3.4% difference in the return on assets here and this can be explained by noticing that the total assets value increased with over 18%, while the net income actually decreased in value. This means that the newly acquired assets have not yet begun to generate income from their activity.

At Arctic, the return on assets was 10.6% in 2004 and 11.8% in 2003. The slight decrease in Arctic's return on assets value can bear the same explanation as in Polaris's case: net income decreased, while the total assets value has actually increased over this period.

The return on equity value will actually measure the amount of profitability that the shareholder obtains from the company. It is calculated by dividing the net income


Cite this Document:

"Financial Analysis The Current Ratios" (2006, October 08) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-analysis-the-current-ratios-72187

"Financial Analysis The Current Ratios" 08 October 2006. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-analysis-the-current-ratios-72187>

"Financial Analysis The Current Ratios", 08 October 2006, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/financial-analysis-the-current-ratios-72187

Related Documents

54 0.54 Asset Turnover 0.35 0.28 Net Assets / Total Assets 0.34 0.34 For these calculations, it is assumed that net assets is defined as total nets, net of liabilities (aka shareholder's equity). The asset management at this firm has changed little over the course of the past year. The only ratio in which a change is noted is the asset turnover, and that is more related to the fact that operating revenue saw an increase of 27.7%

Financial Analysis Rationale for choosing the company for which to invest The company selected for this financial research report is Intel Corporation. The rationale for selecting this company is because Intel is considered to be one of the major pioneers and forerunners in the field of technology. Intel Corporation dominates about 80% of the market share that is made up of microprocessors. Ratio analysis It is imperative to note that the financial statement of

Financial Comparison Financial analysis is a tool that allows third parties to analyze corporate financial statements. One of the main reasons that the Securities and Exchange Commission requires that statements are compiled and presented in a consistent manner is to ensure that third parties will be able to use the statements to compare different companies. These comparisons can, among other things, help with investment decisions. This paper will compare PepsiCo and

Financial Analysis of Wal Mart Financial Analysis of Wal-Mart Company Overview Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) is the largest global retail and chain stores operating in various formats. The company operates more than 8000 stores globally across its business segments, which include electronics, groceries, apparel, and small appliances. Although, Wal-Mart operates a global business, however, more than half of the company businesses are located in the United States. Wal-Mart also operates its global businesses

Financial Analysis Carpetright bills itself as Europe's "leading specialist carpet and floor coverings retailer." The company earns most of its revenue in the United Kingdom (80.1%) with the remainder coming from operations in Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands. The group opened its first store in 1988 and now has 632 stores and over 3300 employees. This report is going to be a comprehensive analysis of Carpetright's financial situation. Five Year Summary Yahoo! Finance

This will attract more customers leading to more profits in the organization. In addition, this will create customer loyalty and the company will have a competitive advantage over its rival. Conclusion In conclusion, it is true that Brocade is a successful company. This is due to its increased realization of profits over the last few years. This is evidence from its financial statements including income statements, balance sheet as well as