Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
The company showed a global reach early, adding numerous language versions around the world. In 2000, the company reached 18 million search queries per day and officially became the world's largest search engine ("Google, Inc." paras. 11-14).
The company now sought to address its need for income by introducing a keyword-targeted advertising program for another source of revenue. The company partnered with Yahoo! And with other partners, such as China's leading portal NetEast and NEC's BIGLOBE in Japan. Google introduced AdWords, a self-service advertising program that could be activated with a credit card. By December of 2000, Google received more than 60 million searches per day and reached the 100-million search mark per day in 2001 ("Google, Inc." paras. 15-16).
Google as a Public Company
Google would offer an IPO of stock beginning in 2004. McShane and Von Glinow cite Google as a successful company, especially in terms of navigating the perils of organizational development as it became a publicly traded stock. Google managed to gain a strong position in the stock market as well as in Internet commerce, and the company did so without altering its internal culture. From the first, the company developed its own style and maintained it even as it offered an IPO. This can be seen from when Eric Schmidt, CEO, made the following statement to investors when announcing the revenues for the first quarter as a publicly traded company:
would like to reiterate that we told potential investors from the start that Google is an unconventional company in many ways, and we made it explicitly clear that we expect to deliver the best results and strongest operational performance and the most consistent execution as we focus strictly on the long-term. We remain committed to these principles around running the business, and we believe that our future performance will continue to validate this approach over the long-term (Q3 2004 Google Earnings Conference Call).
This unconventional approach marked Google from the start, and while many on wall Street saw this as a drawback, investors seem to be in agreement with the idea that unconventional is what e-commerce needs to overcome the problems involved in achieving profits with such a new business plan.
The fortunes of the company's stock have been mixed, often with lower then expected earnings being announced as the company continues to expand and really to free its way into the developing Internet stock world. Many analysts early recommended not investing in Google, in part because of uncertainty about what an Internet stock would be worth. The company itself was open about its differences from the first, as in the following statement from its announcement to potential investors:
Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one. Throughout Google's evolution as a privately held company, we have managed Google differently. We have also emphasized an atmosphere of creativity and challenge, which has helped us provide unbiased, accurate and free access to information for those who rely on us around the world ("Letter from the Founders" para. 1).
Management also noted the normal way analysts judged a stock on the basis of how well the company might meet its earnings projections but stated that Google would be more likely to take long-term opportunities that might sacrifice short-term results in order to assure the long-term strength of the company, a move analysts might not like. Other companies, they state, might accept "predictable earning rather than larger and less predictable returns" ("Letter from the Founders" para. 10). The company stated that it had adequate cash on hand to fund the business and that this would provide it "the flexibility to weather costs, benefit from opportunities and optimize our long-term earnings" ("Letter from the Founders" para. 11). The company also admitted,
Our long-term focus does have risks. Markets may have trouble evaluating long-term value, thus potentially reducing the value of our company. Our long-term focus may simply be the wrong business strategy. Competitors may be rewarded for short-term tactics and grow stronger as a result. As potential investors, you should consider the risks around our long-term focus. ("Letter from the Founders" para. 12)
This sort of openness fits quite well with the company culture and clearly appeals to many investors. It is also difficult to fault the company when it is this one about what is true of most companies, that future performance is not assured and that investors should keep this in mind when making decisions about the company.
Some of the recent analysis of the stock shows that Google is gaining ground with many analysts, as indicated ijn the following chart from Yahoo!:
UPGRADES & DOWNGRADES HISTORY
Jefferies & Co
I am Tech/JSA Research
Global Crown Capital
Overweight recent stock analysis for the company shows the following data:
524.53 (2:07 PM EST)
524.50 x 100
524.69 x 300
The primary business for Google is its search engine, but the company also licenses its technology to more than 100 companies, including America Online. Yahoo! had been a client but dropped Google early in 2004. Google also provides a news site that can search more than 10,000 sources and a shopping site called Froogle. The news site caught on quickly, as noted in a recent article stating,
Stories are generated using Google's complex algorithms and, as the site says, "without human intervention."
Among the factors it considers: where and how often the stories appear elsewhere on the Web. This lack of editors means that, occasionally, some of the story placements are not quite right, but I find that it's constantly improving. (Sreenivasan 11)
Founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page each owns 16% of the company. Sales for 2003 stood at $1,465.9 million, with sales growth over the previous year at 233.5%. Net income in 2003 stood at $105.6 million, for a one year net income growth of 5.9%. The company offered an IPO was offered at $85 to raise $1,666.40 million.
The nature of e-business is still developing, though there are certain advantages to this type of business as well as certain disadvantages. Some operations of brick-and-mortar businesses are the same as those followed in e-business, while others are quite different. In terms of placement, a traditional business places a product in different retail establishments so as to catch the eye, be where potential customers will be, compete with similar products, and reach the widest possible market. For an e-commerce firm, the product is on-site and is placed by the act of creating a website. Reaching the right customers is part of placement, but this is always true. Security for a traditional establishment means locks on the doors, a safe, and perhaps a security guard. For an e-commerce site, security means preventing outsiders from gaining access to proprietary information or to the financial data of customers, and this is more difficult on the Internet than simply buying a better lock. Fulfillment in both venues means increasing revenues and maintaining the business over time, though how this is accomplished can differ greatly. For companies such as Google and Yahoo!, there are generally no products involved, though both sites do have sections for selling products. Selling products, however, is not the primary business for either site and is often conducted by third parties through the portals offered by Google and Yahoo!
One analyst notes the year-by-year appreciation of Google's stock price:
2004: Up 126.8%, from the offering price of $85 to $192.79.
2005: Up 115.2% to $414.86.
2006: Up 11.0% to $460.48.
2007: Up 1.5%, as of April 12.
However, as Kevin Kelleher writes, the stock has more recently slowed its growth from three digits to two while its operating margin has increased by one-third and its net profit margin gone from 13% to 29%. Kelleher sees some danger in the trends now perceived, though it is not clear if this analysis is itself a short-term assessment or has real meaning for the long-term (Kelleher).
The company remains vulnerable to other online services that may come along and provide the same services in a better way. This is already what happened to make Google the preferred search engine over Yahoo! The company does not have a lock on the services it provides, and all are open to a reduction in the number of users when a different service offers something more. The competitive atmosphere may also create a weakness, causing the company to focus too much on its competitors and not on the wider Internet environment.
Google has been…[continue]
"Google Corporate Governance Comes In" (2008, February 12) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/google-corporate-governance-comes-in-32272
"Google Corporate Governance Comes In" 12 February 2008. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/google-corporate-governance-comes-in-32272>
"Google Corporate Governance Comes In", 12 February 2008, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/google-corporate-governance-comes-in-32272
Corporate Sustainability Summary of the purpose of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Reporting corporate sustainability is one of the best ways to ensure that a company is not only doing well financially in the present but also in securing a better and more certain future. The reporting of corporate suitability ensures that the current needs of the organization are effectively met without comprising future needs of the organization. Reporting on corporate sustainability also ensure
Role of Technology in Corporate and Social Responsibility Insider trading. The insider trading case that has become most prominent is that against Raj Rajaratnam who ran the hedgefund Galleon Group, and was charged along with his co-defendant, Danielle Chiesi, a former consultant with New Castle Funds, LLC ("Insider Trading," 2010). Rajaratnam was convicted of 14 counts of insider trading, which makes this case the largest scheme concocted by a hedge fund
Featuring an Analysis of a Corporation Starbucks Company Analysis In the year 1971, Starbucks opened its first store in Seattle's Pike Place Market. At the time, it engaged in selling ground beans over a small counter. In addition, the location was an open-air market, and its beginning, was more or less similar to a hobby. The friends, who started the now renowned global company, were not profit oriented. However, the joining
Multinational Corporations Around the Globe When considering the ever-changing and highly competitive global landscape of business today, large firms must be able to effectively globalize their operations in order to reach a greater potential client base, stay at the cutting edge of their respective fields and sustain profitability in the long-term. With the current exponential growth of technology and computerization of business and learning, consumers have become much more connected
Its success might be called an 'anti-marketing' campaign given that it was done without careful marketing segmentation -- it was marketed to all consumers, with a unified image. Although it does not fit the conventional definitions of either service or product design, and in many ways seems to exist in undefined virtual space, it still possesses a loyal core of users. The goal of every branding campaign, Taylor suggests, is
" (Crawford, 2011) These comments are showing how Wellstone understood the risk that this would pose to the financial system. In eight years after making this speech, the federal government would be directly bailing out firms that were too big to fail. This is indicating how the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act allowed financial institutions to engage in excessive amounts of risk taking. It is at this point that they
State Domination and Financial Markets The Chinese government has characterized its involvement in economic development as "serving rather than supervising the private economy" since 2008 (Xinhua, 2009). With this shift in focus a number of changes to Chinese management can be expected. The paternalistic approach will remain, as it is part of Chinese culture, but there will be further Western influences, particularly with respect to the desire outcomes of management behavior. In