Nuclear Power Has Long Been essay

Download this essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from essay:

Black (2005) notes that within the next decade Great Britain will be unable to meet the energy needs of its population unless nuclear power becomes part of the equation. A dependence on fossil fuel sources for electricity is no longer viable, given the limited supply of fossil fuel, the volatile market for it, and the environmental concerns associated with creating and burning fossil fuels. Nuclear power is touted as at least a temporary solution to an energy supply shortfall. Many nations in Europe including Sweden and Finland are facing similar problems and have already nodded approval to investments in nuclear technology (Anderson & Crooks 2009).

Besides safety issues, nuclear power presents possible financial risks that make the technology less than ideal. Assessing the actual costs of nuclear power processing is close to impossible (Richardson 2005). Cost is sometimes framed as being irrelevant, given the rising prices of fossil fuels and the attendant costs associated with environmental harm. Johnston (2008) claims that nuclear power "will be considerably cheaper than all the alternatives" although "marginally more expensive than gas." Nuclear power manufacturers and stakeholders pitch their product as being cost-effective for marketing purposes, to attract investors. Some sources claim that as many as 80% of all future nuclear power plants will be privately funded and not supported by national governments (Black 2005).

The future of nuclear power depends on creating viable, safe, and sustainable options for nuclear waste disposal. Chernobyl taught the world that nuclear power may be one of the deadliest options for energy generation: more so than fossil fuels considering the short- and long-term effects of radiation. Research into feasible nuclear waste management yields promising but far from perfect results. Most reports detail the realistic consequences of possible fallout including financial, social, ethical, and environmental effects (Higgins, Jones, Munday, Balmforth, Holmes, Pfuderer, Mountford, Harvey & Charnock 2008). However gruesome the study may be, such estimates are crucial when planning possible nuclear power proliferation.

Nuclear power offers a reasonable, although imperfect and short-term solution, to the dependence on fossil fuels for electricity. Fossil fuels are unsurpassed in terms of their ability to power the standard internal combustion engine, and fossil fuels are also used in manufacturing in ways nuclear power cannot be used. Wind, solar, and other non-polluting potential sources for electricity offer the cleanest hope for a sustainable and safe future. Until totally clean sources of energy can provide for the abundant needs of Britain and the rest of the world, nuclear power will remain a key part of the total power package.


Anderson R. & Crooks, E. (2009). Sweden to end ban on new nuclear power. Financial Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Black, R. (2005). Britain facing large energy gap. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Climate Change." BBC. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Emergency Planning." Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (RPII). Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Guide to UK nuclear power." BBC News. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Higgins NA, Jones C, Munday M, Balmforth H, Holmes W, Pfuderer S, Mountford L, Harvey M, Charnock T. (2008). HPA-RPD-046 -COCO-2: a model to assess the economic impact of an accident. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

The 'Hot' nature created by Sellafield." Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Johnston, R. (2008). Ten myths about nuclear power. Spiked. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

McCarthy, John (1995). Frequently asked questions about nuclear energy. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Nuclear Power Now." Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Radiation in the Environment." Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (RPII). Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

Richardson, B. (2005). Nuclear power's cost conundrum. BBC. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at

What is nuclear reprocessing?" BBC News. 19 Feb 2000. Retrieved Feb 9, 2009 at[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Nuclear Power Has Long Been" (2009, February 10) Retrieved December 6, 2016, from

"Nuclear Power Has Long Been" 10 February 2009. Web.6 December. 2016. <>

"Nuclear Power Has Long Been", 10 February 2009, Accessed.6 December. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Nuclear Power Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy and

    Nuclear Power Disadvantages of nuclear energy and its comparison with other sources of energy Comparison of nuclear energy with other sources of energy Nuclear energy does have advantages over other sources of energy like fossil fuels (coal, gas etc.) because nuclear energy makes less pollution and nuclear energy supplies more power than any other source of energy. All sources of energy do have some disadvantages. Some of them are discussed here; Fossil fuel It makes

  • Nuclear Power Plants

    Nuclear Power as a Promising Alternative Fuel for the Future The Nuclear Dilemma (World Nuclear Association) There are a plethora of reasons in which alternative fuels are becoming increasingly desirable as potential power source for everyday consumption in the future. One such reason is that fossil fuels are non-renewable resources that will eventually be exhausted in regards to the feasibility of extracting these resources. It is not necessarily that non-renewable resources will

  • Nuclear Power for Energy and

    This can merely be helpful on local level but not at all on the global level. Radioactive materials in low quantities are present in fossil fuels, chiefly in coal and using them in heavy amounts can have more hazardous effects on the environment causing radioactive contamination globally. This is a much more pressing concern when compared to the radioactive contamination within a nuclear power station as the noxious waste in

  • Environmental Science Nuclear Power Technical

    By regulation, the design of the nuclear reactor must include stipulations for human operator error and equipment failure. Nuclear Plants in the western world use a Defense in Depth idea which is a system with numerous safety components, each with back-up and design to accommodate human error. The components include: "Control of Radioactivity - This requires being able to control the neutron flux. If the neutron flux is decreased the radioactivity

  • Consequences of Developing Nuclear Power

    When compared to oil Uranium is more easily accessible and there is less likelihood of any political interferences because of the locations it is mined. Nuclear power plants require far less space as compared to hydropower plants. This allows them to be placed in developed areas which in turn reduce the distance that electricity needs to be transported. Over short periods of time, the amount of electricity produced is very large

  • Earthquake in Japan Nuclear Power

    It is, however, true that the total nuclear power process creates much less carbon dioxide than fossil fuel plants. Once in existence, it is estimated that the total fuel cycle emissions of nuclear power plants will be 8.6 tons per gigawatt hour, whereas the figure is a massive 1.058 tons for coal plants. Be that as it may, the total nuclear power process does create a great deal less carbon dioxide

  • Against Nuclear Power When Considering the Ever Changing

    Against Nuclear Power When considering the ever-changing and highly competitive global landscape of international relations and business today, all nations and their respective economies must be able to effectively globalize their energy operations in order to reach a greater potential resource base and sustain fiscal durability in the long-term. In accomplishing the aforementioned tasks, many nations have placed environmental considerations at the bottom of the ladder of priority. However, with countless

Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved