Sons of God Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Sons of God" in Genesis 6 are human, by using the following verses as background on the subject: Deuteronomy 9:18, Joshua 7:6, Psalm 112, Genesis 4:26, Numbers 13:33, Job 1:6, 2:1. The Sons of God referred to so briefly in Genesis 6 are indeed human, because they have the distinct human vice of "wickedness," which in the end seals their fate. They are Sons of God who came to Earth to create a race of "giants," but in the end, God removed them all for their wickedness, and replaced the population with the relations of Noah, whom He favored above all at the time. In Deuteronomy 9:18, the Bible alludes to this sin, when Moses beseeches his people not to bring down the anger of the Lord upon them. Implied here is the anger of the Lord that came before, when he flooded the land for forty days and nights that washed all the sinners of the world away, leaving only Noah and his family. Ultimately, the Sons of God are any who God smiles upon and who carry the Word of God throughout the world. They enjoy a special, spiritual relationship with God, but they are not of his blood. They are human, with all the very human qualities, from goodness to sin that implies.

In the Sixth chapter of Genesis, the Bible notes, "That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all they chose" ("Holy Bible" 4). Thus, the stage is set for a great debate. Were the Sons of God human, or were they heavenly creatures sent down from God to create a separate race? Both sides have been debated hotly, but it seems, as more research into the question occurs, that these Sons of God were indeed human, with the same human frailties and fallings that all humans have. One theologian writes calls this chapter of Genesis "the strange semi-mythological tale," and goes on to say,

Where as part of the general conception of the universe the 'Sons of God' are portrayed as attracted by the beauty of the daughters of men, and by commingling with them, producing a brood of giants. The story was originally told to explain the tradition, so common among peoples of antiquity, of a once mightier race that disappeared (Jastrow, Jr. 56).

They were the Sons of God in that they had some of the mighty traits of their Father, but in the end, they still fell like any other human. In fact, earlier in Genesis, in 4:26, the writer notes that "men began to call upon the name of the Lord" ("Holy Bible" 3), thus, even before the Sons of God make an appearance, men have begun calling upon him, and calling him their Father. Numbers 13:33 refers again to this race of giants who later disappeared. "And there we saw the giants, the sons of Amak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight" ("Holy Bible" 123). This reference comes after the reference to the "Sons of God" in Genesis, but seems to refer to the same race of "larger than life" men that God sent to the world, then found to be weak and full of sin.

There are many compelling arguments for both sides in this debate, but one of the most compelling is the actual meaning of the word "son." "Smith's Bible Dictionary" defines the word "son" in the Hebrew as "ben," and notes, "The word 'son' is used in Scripture to imply almost any kind of descent or succession, as 'ben shdnah', 'son of a year,' i.e. A year old, 'ben kesheth,' 'son of a bow,' i.e. An arrow" (Smith 659). Thus, the word son in this context could mean many things, and translated from the Hebrew, it connotes many close relationships, not just that of traditional father and son. The "Sons of God" might have been mighty men, but they were not the actual sons of God in the strictest sense. They were messengers of Him, and carried Him in their hearts. In addition, readers tend to insinuate their own meanings into what they read, and the Bible is no exception. A reader may put the modern connotation of "son" on the words "Sons of God," and read entirely too much into a passage that in reality simply denotes a relationship between God and men. Today, many people believe they have special relationships with God, and consider him the ultimate Father of all humankind. The Sons of God may have felt the same relationship, but they were still very much human.

In Arabic, the word for son is "Salil," and it can mean "sword," as well as "son." In addition, other Arabic words carry different meanings of the word "son." The word "walad" means "a physical boy born as a result of the marriage of a man and a woman" (Massey), and this is the meaning of the word most people recognize today. However, Jesus was referred to by another word, "ibin," or Ibin-Allah (Son of God), which "indicates a strong spiritual relationship between Jesus and God, a spiritual sonship in which Jesus was submissive and obedient to God as His Heavenly Father (Massey). Thus, Arabic translations of this great work could have actually meant these "sons" were the "swords" of God, coming to Earth to create, as others have thought, a race of superior humans who later disappeared, as author Jastrow noted, or they could mean a great spiritual connection. It is clear that each version of the Bible has its' own meaning, and that the King James Version is only one version of many that exist. A true study of the Bible and its' meaning cannot rely on only one translation. A true study must look at the early languages the Bible was originally written in, for a better understanding of just what the writers, and God, were saying. Using the incorrect definition of just one word, such as "son," can give a dramatically different connotation to passages, as these discussions clearly show. Therefore, the "Sons of God" referred to in Genesis have a spiritual relationship with their Father, but were decidedly human. God does not have physical relationships with humans; he simply guides them on their path, and creates strong spiritual relationships with them so that they in turn can guide others.

Throughout the Bible, there are references to the relationship between many of God's messengers and their Lord, such as Moses, Noah, and Joshua. Therefore, God had special and enduring relationships with many humans on Earth. These men could surely be called "Sons of God," even though they were not actual offspring. They carried his message and lived their lives according to the word of God. In fact, before Christ, they were God's word, and carried his work to the rest of the population. Again, the word "son" is the key here, for it can mean many things. However, there are many other references in the Bible to "sons" and the Son of God, most notably Christ. Most theologians today believe that even Christ was not the physical Son of God, for God does not have physical relationships with mortals. Writer Massey continues,

The Bible states that this conception took place through the power of God Himself, not through any human or physical agency. As it was explained to Mary by the angel, 'the Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy offspring shall be called the Son of God' (Luke 1:35)" (Massey).

Thus, if Christ himself was not the "true" physical Son of God, then certainly the other "sons" mentioned in the Bible could not be the true "Sons of God." They were mortals, sent and created to do good work, but always linked back to humankind for their roots.

Of course, one must remember there are many interpretations of the Holy Bible, and each interpretation can have subtly differing meanings in words, phrases, and intent. The many definitions of "son" in Hebrew are just one classic example of these many interpretations. Many Catholics interpret the scriptures in far more literal terms, seeing "Sons of God" as a direct reference to God's own and cherished children. One Catholicism expert note, "Thus the 'sons of God' in Ps 2:7 are angels and not men, as is seen from the reference to clouds in the first part of the verse" (Bird 59). The author refers to the passage "I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art by Son; this day have I begotten thee" ("Holy Bible" 433). However, in the King James Version of the Bible, the earlier passage refers to the Heavens, not clouds, and the passage seems to actually refer to men who carry God in their hearts and his message to others,…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Sons Of God" (2004, July 30) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/sons-of-god-175361

"Sons Of God" 30 July 2004. Web.7 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/sons-of-god-175361>

"Sons Of God", 30 July 2004, Accessed.7 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/sons-of-god-175361

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Son of God a

    According to the concept of homoousion, Christ the Son was consubstantial (sharing the same substance) with the Father." (Gill, 2006) Only then was it resolved that although Jesus was the Son of God, the unique nature of Jesus as Son meant that Jesus, God the Father, and the Holy Spirit all were won. The interpretation of the term "Son of God" continues to divide Judaism from Christianity, theologically and linguistically,

  • Sons of Gods In Genesis

    106). This is an increasingly popular view among the ancient astronaut theorists, for example, with the reference to "Nephilim" being used by some to mean angels, others to mean demons, and yet others who believe these were extraterrestrial visitors and there is enough tangential evidence to fuel additional interest in this explanation concerning these alternative identities of the sons of God. A final explanation is provided by Eastman (2002) who

  • God of the Old Testament Displays Many

    God of the Old Testament displays many human images, many human emotions. Even though we are after all created in His image it still shocks one to read of an angry God or a vengeful God. God seems to play favorites often. We must keep in mind that the Bible was written by man. Man wrote of God in the only manner he could - in human terms. Moses wrote the

  • God Apollo Apollo Is a

    Medea: Since Medea was born as the Princess of Colchis and the niece of Circe, she was a powerful sorceress. Medea fell in love with Jason through the little help she received from Hera when on his quest for the Golden Fleece. Medea helped Hera to steal the sacred artifact for her beloved and received abduction in return. Medea had numerous adventures in her life including murdering her brother to distract

  • God Given Rights Understanding America s Equality and

    God Given Rights: Understanding America's Equality and Freedom The poem "On Being Brought to America" by Phillis Wheatley and The Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson share similarities on the ideals that America possesses. Each of these writings argues for their God given rights, claiming every person is equal. Each must start new: One as a Christian, the others as a government. It is the bravery and the challenge in these

  • God and Nature Jesus Performed

    Jesus then becomes a supreme secondary cause. Paradoxically, though, Jesus is both primary and secondary cause because of His divine nature. Jesus asks the servants to fill up the jars with water, which they do "to the brim," (John 2:7). Then the servants do Jesus's bidding by delivering some of the water to the banquet. Upon serving, the water has been turned into wine. The servants "knew" how the water

  • God s Activity in Men s Lives God s Active

    God's Activity In Men's Lives God's Active Role How many people look for God's activity in their lives, and never come up with the evidence? Yet, in the lives of Mary Rowlandson, and Ben Franklin, they recognized the working of The Almighty in their every day circumstances. Maybe it was that they didn't look for God to prove himself to them, but they acknowledged that the Almighty God is always at work.


Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved