Descartes and his philosophical contributions

DESCARTES' BELIEVE IN GOD

Descartes Believe in God

Descartes' Believe in God

Science attempts to prove how God did or does things. The assessment is heavily disputed by archaic religious doctrines. The traditional conflict between science and religion is entirely based on the dominion and not what is right or wrong. Rene Descartes' belief in God is not based on atheistic principles, but on blasphemy as seen from the way he investigates God's functions. Whilst examining Descartes' belief in the existence of God, it establishes that Descartes does not dispute the existence of God, but has a different opinion (parallel from the religion). A scientific argument proving Descartes' arguments and a reflection on his presumptions are provided.

Does Descartes believe in God?

As a philosopher and mathematician, Descartes dedicated his work entirely on writing and researching. His arguments combined humanism, science, and religion to arrive on the much-aggrandized assumptions of natural processes. Olson (2006) reflects Descartes' opinions on religion as scientific equation and God as a superior being that illuminates humanism (p.75). From Descartes' perspective, God has imbued humans with a special spirit and mind that communicate inherently. In fact, Descartes publications on science showed God as a superior being who controlled nature. However, Descartes was not a staunch believer although he was a diligent attendee of the Roman Catholic Church.

Evidently, Descartes observed religion because it fulfilled his natural approach in solving the critical syntax of humanism. Sweetman (2004) shows that Descartes' philosophy was primarily centered in epistemology where solutions to science and religion were based on the body and mind problems (p.49). Descartes' atheistic beliefs are primarily on the notions of the Enlightenment Era; people of the time possessed rational grounds for choosing what they believed and what they did not. This idea is grounded on chauvinism and backed by the knowledge that one's belief was not questionable and a private affair. Descartes in a special case one not based on atheism, but blasphemy claims. It is conclusive to argue that Descartes applied religion and beliefs for his general humanity-based scientific endeavors.

Descartes arguments are convincing

Critical philosophy that was developed during the Enlightenment Era attempted to reexamine the relationship between civilization and religion. It is prudent to note that political ideologies that were spearheaded by communism and capitalism played a critical role in examining the validity of the church. Capitalism, which was heavily aided by religion, lost influence because of the negativity and the atrocities associated with it. McKnight (1999) argues that Enlightenment Era was heavily politicized to the extent that it eroded necessary dialogue (p.96). Constant collisions in ideology prompted the Enlightenment Era to pave way for the development of deism ideologies. These ideologies dogmatized the society in the belief of one single God and religious reasons were based on natural reason unlike the common supernatural revelations. In the end, the religious good was replaced by the social and political ideologies. In fact, Descartes fulfilled the natural laws accustomed to a politics-based religious platform like any other philosopher of the Enlightenment Era (Kohn 34).

Archaic religious beliefs of the medieval period were based on meditations on first philosophy. Williams (2009) presents the technicalities and relationships between religious assumption and political affiliation, which were solely based on human inefficiencies (p.43). Above all, the understanding of good and bad (conscious) formed the background factor that was considered during the processing of a given believe. For philosophers such as Descartes, it was apparently that moral right or wrong was to be shifted from the church to one's heart. Descartes tried to apply scientific knowledge to develop partners, which managed human being morality. In his experiments, Descartes attempted to prove that mediating gland H (Pineal gland) aided the interaction between body and the rational soul. In encapsulation, God made Man with a complete system to process vital choices regarding personal decisions when it came to believing or not believing in God -- so God applied science and not superstition.

Reflection

Modern philosophers will often question the validity of Descartes' ideologies. This may include the need to know the relationship between science and religion as presumed by Descartes. Seybold (2007) presents a critical assumption of science stating that it is seen as a rational process that seeks to uncover the truth within the universe (p.62). However, religion is viewed as an irrational process that is based on faith and superstition. Presently, perception and science based on reason dominates over religion, which is often considered as archaic, impractical, and credulous. In this study, Descartes proves that God exists, but scientifically. However, the religious believe which solely bestows God as one supernatural being whose authority and the process are not questionable contradicts this.

Descartes strived to prove that there is a strong sense of humanity based on intrinsic decorum and benevolence. However, this cannot be realized because of the rampant bashing of the several evaluations of religious relations like God or eternity. From Descartes perspective, God is a larger product of scientific knowledge and the utmost superior being who applies science to control what he owns. Descartes attempt to pass the message that once human beings can understand the control of God's workings (science), they will confirm, "that everything bear witness to the power and goodness of God" (Broughton and Carreiro 29). This leads confirms our perception that it is blasphemous to 'trying to examine God's operative nature'.