Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
AT&T and Verizon
Background
Both AT&T and Verizon have their roots as Baby Bells, large telecom companies that arose after the breakup of Bell. These are two of the largest telecom companies in the United States. At the time of the breakup, telecom was a highly stable business based on landline telecommunications, but the industry has transformed and is now strongly driven by wireless. As wireless technology continues to improve, being a player in wireless means having a high level of investment in fixed infrastructure assets, something that is evident on the balance sheets of both of these companies.
However, these companies differ significantly on how they are structured. Their businesses are very similar, but AT&T has kept a relatively low debt level, and sought growth through expansion. The massive amount of goodwill on its balance sheet and relatively small amount of long-term debt indicate this. Verizon, by contrast, has not been a player in M&A to nearly the same degree that AT&T has been, and instead has taken on debt in order to finance its infrastructure buildout. The analysis of the finances of these two companies shows that while they have similar businesses in terms of operations, they have very different approaches to these businesses from a financial perspective, and that these differences have a significant impact on the shareholders of these two companies.
The common size income statements for AT&T and Verizon for the past two years are as follows:
Income Statement
Raw
CS
Raw
CS
2016
2015
Revenue
163786
100.00%
146801
100.00%
Cost of Service
76884
46.94%
67046
45.67%
Gross Income
86902
53.06%
79755
54.33%
SGA Exp
36347
22.19%
32919
22.42%
Impairments
361
0.22%
35
0.02%
Depreciation
25847
15.78%
22016
15.00%
Operating Income
24347
14.87%
24785
16.88%
Net Income
13333
8.14%
13345
9.09%
Verizon
Income Statement
Raw
CS
Raw
CS
2016
2015
Revenue
125980
100.00%
131620
100.00%
Cost of Service
51424
40.82%
52557
39.93%
Gross Income
74556
59.18%
79063
60.07%
SGA Exp
31569
25.06%
29986
22.78%
Impairments
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
Depreciation
15928
12.64%
16017
12.17%
Operating Income
27059
21.48%
33060
25.12%
Net Income
13608
10.80%
18375
13.96%
The common size statements allow for easier comparison of the two companies. There are a couple of things that stand out from this analysis. The first is that AT&T has a much higher cost of service than does Verizon. As a consequence, AT&T ends up with lower operating and net margins. Both companies have roughly the same selling, general and administrative expenses, though Verizon's increased...
It is worth noting that Verizon's raw number only increased by a couple of million dollars, but the revenue figures decreased, which made SGA expense, which is generally viewed as a fixed cost, a much greater percentage of revenues. It was probably targeted to be more at 22% again, but went higher when revenue failed to reach 2015 levels. The cost of service increased slightly as well. The operating expense took a hit at a result.
While Verizon saw its revenues decrease, AT&T saw a significant increase in expenses. As with Verizon, AT&T saw the cost of service increase slightly, but its SGA expense was held around the same. The company has a higher depreciation expense to begin with, and that actually increased despite the increased revenues. AT&T saw its profit increase in terms of raw number but the profit margin diminished.
Comparing the performance of the two companies on their common size income statements, AT&T had a better year in 2016 in a lot of respects, but still performs more poorly in terms of its margins and cost structure than Verizon does.
AT&T
Balance Sheet
Raw
CS
Raw
CS
2016
2015
Cash
5788
1.44%
5121
1.27%
Accounts Rec
16794
4.16%
16532
4.11%
Current Assets
38369
9.51%
35992
8.94%
PPE
124899
30.97%
124450
30.91%
Goodwill
105207
26.09%
104568
25.97%
Fixed Assets
364912
90.49%
366680
91.06%
Total Assets
403281
100.00%
402672
100.00%
Accounts Payable
31138
7.72%
30372
7.54%
Current Liabilities
50576
12.54%
47816
11.87%
Long Term Debt
113681
28.19%
118515
29.43%
Shareholders' Eq
124110
30.78%
123640
30.70%
Verizon
Balance Sheet
Raw
CS
Raw
CS
2016
2015
Cash
2880
1.18%
4470
1.83%
Accounts Rec
17513
7.17%
13457
5.51%
Current Assets
26395
10.81%
22365
9.16%
PPE
232215
95.10%
83541
34.21%
Goodwill
27205
11.14%
25331
10.37%
Fixed Assets
217785
89.19%
221810
90.84%
Total Assets
244180
100.00%
244175
100.00%
Accounts Payable
19593
8.02%
19362
7.93%
Current Liabilities
30340
12.43%
35052
14.36%
Long Term Debt
105433
43.18%
103240
42.28%
Shareholders' Eq
24032
9.84%
17842
7.31%
Analysis of the common size balance sheets shows that Verizon has higher accounts receivable as a percentage of total assets – in fact in 2016 it had a higher number period,…
References
2016 AT&T Annual Report. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://investors.att.com/~/media/Files/A/ATT-IR/financial-reports/annual-reports/2016/att-ar2016-completeannualreport.pdf
2016 Verizon Annual Report. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://www.verizon.com/about/sites/default/files/annual_reports/2016/downloads/Verizon-AnnualReport2016_financial.pdf
Elsea, Z. (2017). AT&T's acquisition of Time Warner could be in trouble. Forbes. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/legalentertainment/2017/11/02/atts-acquisition-of-time-warner-could-be-in-jeopardy/#e24c42876cae
NetMBA (2010) Common size financial statements. NetMNBA. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from http://www.netmba.com/finance/statements/common-size/
Organizational Context Verizon is a national telecommunications company, headquartered in New York City. The company was formed from the breakup of Bell and subsequent mergers and acquisitions. The company has divisions for media, network and technology and customer/product operations. The latter is by far the largest component of the company, encompassing Verizon Wireless, and a number of companies aimed at the enterprise market. Verizon competes against AT&T and Sprint, both of
The latter is typically used for network equipment for local telephone operations. Depreciation policies include the recording of plant, property and equipment at cost. Local telephone operations again are subject to different depreciation methods, and use the straight line method and the group remaining life method, depending on the asset. The company also chooses to capitalize all software that has a useful life of over one year. The straight
AT&T is in basic terms a telecommunications services provider with operations not only in the U.S. But also in other parts of the world. In this text, I conduct an analysis of the company. In so doing, I will amongst other things explore its accounting systems and internal controls. Further, I will also conduct a brief review of its financial statements. Company Overview In so many ways, AT&T can be regarded an
This could bring a flood of new competitors to the market. Verizon is working with other wireless providers to gain preferential access to new wavelengths. Previous auctions, including the 2007 auction of the 700 MHz spectrum that Verizon won, came with open-access rules. Verizon is battling the FCC with regards to the regulator's desire for openness rules on all bandwidth, something Verizon considers a threat to be actively combated
Overall, at&T is the more profitable of the two companies. That Verizon has the stronger gross margins and at&T the stronger net margins indicates that at&T does a better job of controlling its cost structure than does Verizon. The Industry The telecommunications industry is highly competitive in both the landline and wireless segments. By 2006, wireless spending had match wireline spending. While this presents significant opportunities for telecommunications, much of that spending
The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition