Buy or Sell
In making this calculation, the first thing to remember is that overhead is never to be included in a capital budgeting decision. If management "insists," that is too bad for them. Only costs incremental to the decision at hand should be included. That policy will not be violated for any reason. The nature of the indirect labor is not known. If this is an overhead cost, it should be omitted, but it might be incremental labor. Since we do not know this we should take a conservative approach and include it.
The following are the results of a net present value calculation on the two options:
Taiwanese Supplier
Forecasted Demand
Cost
Shipping
Add Inventory
Admin
Total cost
23240
34740
57740
PV
20208.7
26268.43
37964.99
NPV
84442.11
Producing in-house
Fixed Cost
10000
DM
10000
15000
25000
DL
13500
22500
Ind labor
Benefits
Engineering
30000
0
0
62300
33450
55750
PV
54173.91
25293.01
36656.53
NPV
116123.4
Based on this calculation, the in-house option costs more over the three-year life of the project. As such, the company should purchase from the Taiwanese supply. Just remember to make the contract in USD so that the supplier bears the foreign exchange rate risk.
Role-Playing: Seller/Trader
The jacket vendor's cost is $30, which equates to 200,000 of local currency. The exchange rate is therefore 6666.66 to 1.
The buyer has a total of $115 worth of currency, $100 in dollars and $15 in local. The buyer is getting a deal no matter what, but will want to bring the price down a bit.
The seller is also getting a deal no matter what, since the cost of a jacket is $30 or 200,000 local. From the seller's perspective, a discount is required to sell in local currency, as hard currency has more stable value. The buyer likely also prefers to use hard currency, rather than losing on the currency exchange. There is room for both to find common, profitable ground. The seller will find other customers and would therefore not accept less than 300,000. The common ground for a deal is massive, there should be no problems.
Role Playing: Supplier Decision
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.