CJI Case Study: Supply Chain Strategy for Bilge Pumps
This case study examines CJ Industries' (CJI) supply chain dilemma following a major five-year, $10 million annual contract with Great Lakes Pleasure Boats. The central problem is whether CJI can guarantee a consistent supply of bilge pumps given uncertainties surrounding its current supplier, Heavey Pumps, and the challenges of in-house production or alternative sourcing. The paper identifies four possible solutions—continuing with Heavey Pumps, producing in-house, using alternative suppliers, or combining approaches—and recommends a diversified, combination strategy. It concludes with a phased implementation plan emphasizing risk management, quality control, supplier communication, and contingency planning.
- Major Facts: Contract details, supplier dependency, and production options
- Major Problem: Can CJI guarantee reliable bilge pump supply?
- Possible Solutions: Four sourcing alternatives with pros and cons
- Choice and Rationale: Combination supplier strategy recommended for risk management
- Implementation: Phased steps: negotiate, pilot, diversify, and plan contingencies
- Discussion Questions: Stakeholder perspectives, trade-offs, and contract compliance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The case study uses a clear, structured format—facts, problem, solutions, rationale, and implementation—making it easy to follow the analytical progression.
- The recommendation is grounded in a direct comparison of trade-offs across all four alternatives, rather than selecting an option without justification.
- The implementation section translates the abstract recommendation into concrete, sequenced action steps, strengthening the practical value of the analysis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates systematic decision analysis: it defines a problem, enumerates alternatives with explicit advantages and disadvantages, selects the best option based on risk-benefit reasoning, and operationalizes the decision through a phased plan. This mirrors a standard business case framework used in operations and supply chain management courses.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with six numbered facts that establish context, then poses a single focused problem statement. Four solutions are evaluated in parallel format. The recommended solution (D) is justified briefly but clearly. The implementation section expands into paragraph form, addressing supplier negotiation, pilot production, quality control, stakeholder communication, and contingency planning. Three discussion questions close the paper, revisiting stakeholder perspectives and compliance strategy.
Major Facts
1. CJ Industries (CJI) Awarded a Major Contract: In October 2007, CJI secured a five-year contract with Great Lakes Pleasure Boats worth $10 million annually, starting July 2008. This contract represents 30% of CJI's annual sales.
2. CJI's Dependency on Heavey Pumps: CJI has been purchasing bilge pumps from Heavey Pumps, a local manufacturer, on a non-contractual basis. These pumps are among the components CJI supplies to Great Lakes.
3. Increased Demand and Supply Challenges: The new contract requires CJI to supply 50 bilge pumps per month, a significant increase from previous sporadic orders of 50 pumps every four to six months.
4. Uncertainty of Heavey Pumps' Capacity: There are doubts about Heavey Pumps' ability and willingness to meet the increased demand.
5. In-House Production Consideration: CJI has the capability to manufacture these pumps in-house, but doing so would require a $500,000 investment, space clearance, and additional labor.
6. Alternative Suppliers: Other bilge pump manufacturers exist, but they are located farther away and have not been previously used by CJI.
Major Problem
Can CJ Industries guarantee a consistent and reliable supply of bilge pumps to meet the demands of the new contract with Great Lakes Pleasure Boats, given the uncertainties with their current supplier, Heavey Pumps, and the challenges of in-house production or using alternative suppliers?
Possible Solutions
Advantages: Established relationship, proven quality.
Disadvantages: Uncertainty in meeting increased demand; potential production and delivery cost increases.
Advantages: Control over production, potential long-term cost savings.
Disadvantages: High initial investment, lack of experience in pump manufacturing, time constraints.
Advantages: Potential to meet demand, diversification of supply sources.
Disadvantages: Unknown quality and reliability, increased logistics costs.
Advantages: Spreads risk, ensures supply continuity.
Disadvantages: Complexity in coordination, potential quality inconsistencies.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.