Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Compare and Contrast Servant Leadership and Followership
Followership and servant leadership are two philosophies that are used by leaders of today when working with soldiers on a day-to-day basis. Leaders can't work alone, and it is for this reason that they need the assistance and help of the soldiers who are under them. In both of these roles, there has to be mutual respect and patience, selflessness and versatility, and awareness of oneself and those around.
A servant leader thrives upon the idea of having to gather ideas from others during the decision making process (McAuley, 2016). Servant leadership is grounded upon the army ethics and values that allow for the development of soldiers. A servant leader provides inspirational motivation to the juniors by how they perform their tasks and this serves as an example to them (Harber & McMaster, 2018). Servant leadership is not focused on individual benefits but rather on the benefits of the whole group. Servant leadership personifies values like honesty, humility, and integrity.
Followership is defined as reaching a particular goal while exercising respect for authority, having a positive attitude, self-discipline, and integrity (Adair et al., 2016). The first characteristic that is connected to followership is trust. A leader should ensure that they act in a manner that is transparent and worthy of trust at all times. The actions of the leader should be deemed as respectful and professional. The second characteristic is strong serving his or her organization. Followership pushes for one to recognize his or her strengths and how these strengths can influence those who they work with. The last characteristic is taking responsibility for ones actions.
In conclusion, followership and servant leadership are both similar in that they require a leader to have good morals, trust, serve others, and act professionally. The differences between the two are that servant leadership brings others to the decision-making table. Followers only offer help when needed.
References
Adair, R., Agarwala, T., Armstead, S., Berg, P., Bisschoff, T., Blair, B. A., . . . Francis, A. (2016). Followership in Action.
Harber, G. G., & McMaster, C. C. (2018). ? Adapting Servant Leadership to Follower Maturity: A Dynamic Leadership Approach for a Diverse Environment. Servant Leadership: Theory & Practice, 5(1), 5.
McAuley, C. D. (2016). Servant leadership, exemplary followership, and organizational trust: A quantitative correlational study in performing arts organizations. University of Phoenix.
Servant Leadership Even though servant leadership is in most cases associated with the Bible and Jesus Christ it is quite compatible with most religions and theories of philosophy. This paper is a comparative study using Greenleaf's characteristics of servant leadership which is based on Christianity against other philosophy and other leadership theories. "…The great leader is seen as servant first…"-Robert K. Greenleaf. This is a fragment from a sentence in an essay
Servant Leadership At the center of servant leadership is a leader's ability to transform a team, department or entire organization by concentrating on their specific needs for direction, individualized coaching, development and recognition. A highly effective servant leader will also have a correspondingly high level of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and exhibit the traits of transformational leadership (Washington, Sutton, Feild, 2006). A highly effective servant leader will often create unique development and
Servant Leadership Defining Servant Leadership The principles of Servant Leadership were laid out by founder Robert Greenleaf in his important 1970 book, The Servant as Leader. Greenleaf, to his great credit, wanted to stress the point that leaders should first serve, and later lead through service. The leaders who have power but have not led, and use the power to push his or her own viewpoints and agenda, are not the kind
This is why the journal article advocated more empirical research that is still lacking ten years later (Russell & Stone, 2002, 145). B. Servant Leadership-Greenleaf The primary aspect is that a servant leader is first a servant who feels a natural need to provide for the needs of others (Greenleaf & Spears, 2002, 27). A concrete example of this would have been a leader such as Martin Luther King Jr. who
Therefore, the servant leadership theory reflects the need for analyzing this type of leadership. Servant Leadership Cons There is also certain criticism addressed by some to this theory. It seems that servant leadership provides a too soft approach that does not favor the development of competitiveness within the company. The increased competition in the business environment requires that companies also build a competitive environment within them in order to help employees
Servant Leadership Annotated Bibliography Within the context of organized behavior, leadership is one of the critical and core aspects. True leadership is decision making, but it is more complex. Leaders are not managers -- but they may manage. Leadership is less formal, more psychological, and effective leadership looks at more of the gray than the black and white and enables others, or other teams, to work well to achieve goals while