Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Criminal Justice Exit Exam
e Criminal Justice Department graduating seniors an exit exam a measure departmental learning outcomes. How tool determine criminal justice major effective? Original responses substantial significant supported additional scholarly reference textbook. The utility of the degree cannot be measured in students' grades alone on any kind of academic assessment. Of course, there are students who may have been successful, regardless of the major they chose. But if students with the major are able to obtain work both within the field and outside of it and sustain that vocational success over time, this is one measure of the effectiveness of the degree, particularly given that the degree is a practical social sciences major, constructed with an intention of preparing students for working in the 'real world' of the justice system, rather than training them in theory.
The Criminal Justice Department has been asking graduating seniors to take an exit exam as a measure of departmental learning outcomes. How could that tool be used to determine if the criminal justice major is effective?
According to Lightfoot & Doerner (2007), despite the considerable expenditure of attending a university, little is known about the relative success of criminal justice majors in preparing students for future careers. The dropout rate for social science degrees is 50%, compared with 10% for students in the humanities and the time-to-degree rate of program completion has increased for all students, in all majors (Lightfoot & Doerner 2007:114). Asking students to take an exit exam is problematic, because, by definition, the students who have 'made it' throughout their four years of schooling have attained some level of success. Students who fail to find support within the major as undergraduates will not be counted.
The content of an exit exam would also be difficult to determine, given that students have extremely diverse backgrounds within the major. Some students may focus on forensics, while others may be training to be corrections officers. Agreeing as to what constituted an acceptable base of knowledge would require input for a wide…
References
Lightfoot, Robert C & William G. Doerner. (2008). Student success and failure in a graduate criminology/criminal justice program American Journal of Criminal Justice: AJCJ,
33 (1): 113-129.
Stack, Steven & Thomas Kelley. (2002). The graduate record examination as a predictor of graduate student performance. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13 (2).335-349.
Criminal Justice Department has been asking graduating seniors to take an exit exam as a measure of departmental learning outcomes. How could that tool be used to determine if the criminal justice major is effective? Please assess, in detail, in the context of this week's chapter readings. An exit exam could indeed be extremely effective in assessing whether the criminal justice major is effective in a range of capacities. First
Criminal Justice Administration and TSA Selecting and Training TSA Inspectors Last year, the Department of Homeland Security (2010) released a publication entitled "Transportation Security Administration's Management Of Its Screening Workforce Training Program Can Be Improved." The publication recommended that TSA could improve management of its training program by "developing and documenting standard processes to: [1] Use Officer test results to evaluate training program results; [2] Assign on-the-job training responsibilities; and [3] Evaluate
Criminal Justice & Criminology Has the Miranda vs. Arizona ruling decreased the percentage of arresting official violations of defendant Fifth Amendment rights? (Rian) CJ327W Research Methods in Criminal Justice The Miranda vs. Arizona ruling has attracted notable attention to the treatment of the accused in the hands of the law. Specifically, the ruling affirmed the rights to the accused under the law and to the legal rights of the accused. The research was
In their study, "Thinking of Inclusion for All Special Needs Students: Better Think Again," Rasch and his colleagues (1994) report that, "The political argument in favor of inclusion is based on the assumption that the civil rights of students, as outlined in the 1954 decision handed down in Brown v. Board of Education, which struck down the concept of 'separate but equal,' can also be construed as applying to special
Authors present the results of a national law enforcement technology survey and comparable forensics technology survey that was conducted by the RAND Corporation to assess the effectiveness of this support and constraints to applying forensic technologies at the state and local level. Authors devote several chapters to different types of forensic analyses, including what types of techniques are best suited for various types of crimes and the evidence that
Strategic, Tactical and Administrative Crime Analysis Crime analysis is one of the most important processes in the fight against crime and efforts towards enhancing the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in dealing with crime. In the past few years, crime analysis has continued to expand in law enforcement agencies across the globe. This expansion has contributed to the development and use of different methods of crime analysis including strategic, tactical,