Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Topic: Is physician assisted suicide morally acceptable when a person is suffering from a painful, incurable, terminal condition?Physician-assisted dying has become a contentious issue that pits the rights of the patient for autonomy and self-determination against the principles surrounding the practice of medical care. Seven states have passed laws that allow physicians to help terminally ill patients by offering medications that hasten death (Whitcomb, 2018). However, the American Medical Association and other organizations disapprove of physician-assisted dying. This paper will outline the arguments on both sides, focusing on two online articles.
Article Against
The first article is an opinion piece published by the American Medical Association. While this article is not scholarly and does not even provide a binding or governing tenet for the medical profession, it is nevertheless authored by a credible source. The authors argue that the goal of medical care is to preserve or extend life, not to terminate it.
Premise 1: Physician-assisted dying “would cause more harm than good,” (American Medical Association, 2018, p. 1).
Premise 2: Physician-assisted dying is “fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose...
1).
Conclusion: Physician-assisted suicide is not morally acceptable, even when a person is suffering.
Evaluation of Article: This article fails to substantiate the primary premises, and offers no evidence or even logical reasoning to support the claims. It is highly likely that the American Medical Association is biased against physician-assisted death because of fears of legal liability and not because of the desire to actually help patients. The American Medical Association counts on its own brand and perceived credibility, but fails to provide adequate evidence or reasoning in favor of their position. For example, the article mentions the need for respecting patient autonomy but does not indicate how patient autonomy can be respected in cases where a person is suffering from an incurable terminal condition.
Article in Favor
An article published by the organization Death with Dignity outlines the terminology used in physician-assisted dying. The purpose of the article is to better inform the public about what is meant by physician-assisted suicide, but ultimately the authors are in favor of legalized physician-assisted dying.
Premise 1: There are abundant safeguards in place to prevent the abuse of physician-assisted dying laws.…
Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Kantian View Thanks to modern developments in medical technology, people in advanced countries today live longer and stay healthy until they are relatively older. The technology, however, also allows some people to hasten their death and make it relatively pain-free. As a result, many patients suffering from unbearable pain of certain incurable illnesses from time to time ask their physicians to help them commit suicide. Any physician who
Physician-Assisted Suicide, And Active Euthanasia In Favor of the Moral Permissibility of Active Physician-Assisted Suicide According to Mappes and DeGrazia, Brock's support for voluntary active euthanasia is largely based on two ethical values that he regards fundamental (402). The values in this case include the well-being of an individual and individual autonomy or self-determination. Self-determination according to Brock has got to do with letting individuals chart their own destiny, that is, allowing
In an article in the British journal Lancet, the doctor stated that he liked Helen right off the bat, and then issued this statement: The thought of Helen dying so soon was almost too much to bear… on the other hand, I found even worse the thought of disappointing this family. If I backed out, they'd feel about me the way they had about their previous doctor, that I had
At the very least, those that hold different opinions on physician-assisted suicide should agree that medical treatment must never be at odds with moral treatment. Even though medical treatment is specialized and often differs from the way human beings usually treat each other, medical treatment should never be placed in the position where it goes against the basic moral ideals of how human beings should treat each other. As pointed out,
Physician-assisted suicide is a humane approach to dying and should be adopted legally in all states. Anyone who is terminally ill should have the right to choose how they die, specifically since they face death every day. Physician-assisted suicide is no more harmful than other methods of patient care that address patients needs, rights and desires. Given the fact that most terminally ill patients have a limited life to live,
Physician-Assisted Suicide A Review of Relevant Literature and Popular Opinion Physician-assisted suicide has become a hot topic of late and many people think it is about these physicians becoming killers. This is not true, however, despite the opinions that many hold. The main problem is that many feel that physician-assisted suicide will give doctors too much control over the deaths of their terminally ill patients. This is not the case, however, as