Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Physician-assisted suicide is a humane approach to dying and should be adopted legally in all states. Anyone who is terminally ill should have the right to choose how they die, specifically since they face death every day. Physician-assisted suicide is no more harmful than other methods of patient care that address patients needs, rights and desires. Given the fact that most terminally ill patients have a limited life to live, it is the duty of doctors and health care providers to see their rights and wishes are granted, even if those wishes include a hastened journey toward death. For many patients death is a far more optimistic outcome than living a life of pain and suffering.
The Argument
A growing body of health care workers, doctors and physicians currently support physician-assisted suicide as a compassionate and caring method to deliver ones last rights. Woodman (2000) points out that many health care workers believe that the desire among people to speed up their progression toward death is actually quite normal, healthy and a rational approach to a devastating situation. Many also reveal that the request for a quickened death is quite a common response (Woodman, 2000).
Many historical events have changed the healthcare communities views toward physician-assisted suicide, none the least of which is the AIDS epidemic, which for many years had a clear outcome of death and suffering for patients (Woodman, 2000). Patients who knew they would die increasingly requested that physicians assist them in their plight, to hasten their journey to the other side and reduce their pain and suffering. While some may have objections to this a vast majority must agree that in some cases physician-assisted suicide is compassionate, not only for suffering patients but also for family members that must endure the...
Most patients end up counting on family or friends to assist them when they make the decision to die (Woodman, 2000). Instead of dying with dignity many patients suffering from terminal illness resort to barbaric or archaic methods of death including smothering by pillows or even slitting their own wrists (Woodman, 2000).
Ultimately a physician assisted killing is more human and just than a suicide done poorly as a result of lack of resources. Despite what opponents may feel one must admit death through injection is more humane than death by shooting. Despite this fact law often interferes with a patients ability to decide the manner in which they die. Within America an ideology exists with respect to medicine, a belief that medical practice must be tied to modern science and that certain risks are involved when medicine is practiced in this manner (Palmer, 2000). Mankind believes that some sort of law must govern the use of technology and whether certain aspects of medicine like euthanasia should be institutionalized (Palmer, 2000). Unfortunately the law often sides against the needs of patients suffering from terminal illness, preventing them from seeking assistance when selecting their method of death.
Of course no sane person would prefer that someone would have to decide between suicide or life (Rogatz, 2001). In ever instance great care should be taken to help patients lead a life that is fully and rewarding to the best of their ability. Opponents have suggested that physician-assisted suicide turns doctors into killers (Rogatz, 2001). Realistically speaking however these doctors are perhaps more humane than others who might let patients suffer endlessly when no…
Physician-Assisted Suicide A Review of Relevant Literature and Popular Opinion Physician-assisted suicide has become a hot topic of late and many people think it is about these physicians becoming killers. This is not true, however, despite the opinions that many hold. The main problem is that many feel that physician-assisted suicide will give doctors too much control over the deaths of their terminally ill patients. This is not the case, however, as
Because so many other countries in the world look toward the Netherlands and their assisted suicide policies, medical officials there continually review and revise (if necessary) the guidelines to keep stringent watch over physicians and patients. Many other countries that are considering their own assisted suicide laws keep track of what happens in the Netherlands, and alter their own legislation accordingly. The Netherlands policies are not perfect, but they indicate
Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Right to Die Abstract More and more patients in and end-of-life phase are expressing a desire for physician-assisted suicide (PAS) as an option that allows them to die with dignity and forego the pain and suffering associated with their disease and deteriorating condition. Yet in most states in the U.S., physician-assisted suicide remains illegal. The policy of this paper would be for lawmakers to be encouraged to pass a
Physician Assisted Suicide in Patients With Unbearable Suffering or the Terminally Ill One of the most hotly debated issues today is physician-assisted suicide. Recently, California became the fifth state to legalize physician-assisted suicide, and there is an increasing likelihood that other states will follow suit in the foreseeable future. The purpose of this study is to determine if the factors chosen have any bearing on those who choose to end their
Laws and Health Care The health care industry has undergone massive overhaul in recent times and the impact of the laws and regulations that accompany this change have deep and resounding effects on the way professionals approach their industry. The purpose of this essay is to explain the role of governmental regulatory agencies and their effect on the health care industry. This essay will first provide two examples of laws and regulations
Sometimes history needs to be rewritten so as to comport with modern sensibilities. Today, we live in an era where the average life span has been increases as a result of modern technology; however, sometimes our lives our being prolonged (e.g. given more quantity) at the expense of quality of life. The founding fathers of our nation did not have such technological and ideological issues to debate. In fact,