Finance I Would Explain To Research Proposal

7) Bill should not indulge her wish to learn about cherry-picking undervalued stocks. The markets are assumed to have perfect information, so any presumption of truly picking undervalued stocks is risky, especially for an inexperienced investor like Mary. Moreover, she has more conservative investment needs than what would be offered by seeking such investments. Hot tips are not appropriate for an investor like Mary.

8) Exhibit 1 is missing 20%, which we will assume to be Boom, with expected rates of return extrapolated as +40% for high tech and -15% for counter-cyclical. Thus, the rate of return expected for the portfolio will be the weighted average of the expected returns for each segment. Therefore Expected Return for the Portfolio =

5) * [(.2)(-25)+(.2)(-20)+(.3)(15)+(.1)(25)+(.2)(40)] + (.5) * [(.2)(20)+(.2)(16)+(.3)(12)+(.1)(-9)+(.2)(-15)]

This gives us an expected return of 6.45%. If we extrapolate the index fund return in a Boom to be 20%, the expected return of the market is 5.9%. Therefore, the risk of the portfolio is equivalent to a beta of 1.09. This is reasonable, because counter-cyclical stocks will help to create a hedge in the portfolio against the wild swings in the high tech stocks.

...

This carries a lower risk than the previous example, and is lower than the risk she currently faces. This combination would be therefore better than either for her.
10) Bill should propose as a portfolio for Mary that includes a strong safety element. Her time horizon is around 20-30 years, so she should still retain some upside in the form of Index funds, and maybe a small component of high tech. However, her inexperience, conservative nature and inability to recuperate from losses means that safety is the highest priority. Therefore, I would propose a portfolio of 50% fixed income, 40% index funds, and 10% high tech. This has an expected return of 5.46%. In the worst case scenario, the portfolio loses 4% as the high tech and fixed income cancel each other out. In the best case scenario the portfolio gains a healthy 14.5%, so she still captures some of the market's growth potential.

Sources:

Mark McCracken, the Security Market Line [article online] 2006; Accessed August 19, 2008; available at http://www.teachmefinance.com/securitymarketline.html

Ben McClure, Modern…

Sources Used in Documents:

Sources:

Mark McCracken, the Security Market Line [article online] 2006; Accessed August 19, 2008; available at http://www.teachmefinance.com/securitymarketline.html

Ben McClure, Modern Portfolio Theory: An Overview [article online] 2008; Accessed August 19, 2008; available at http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/capm.asp


Cite this Document:

"Finance I Would Explain To" (2008, August 19) Retrieved May 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/finance-i-would-explain-to-28438

"Finance I Would Explain To" 19 August 2008. Web.19 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/finance-i-would-explain-to-28438>

"Finance I Would Explain To", 19 August 2008, Accessed.19 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/finance-i-would-explain-to-28438

Related Documents

Finance One difference between industries with high leverage and low leverage is a split between the need for fixed assets (high leverage) and a reliance on intellectual capital (low leverage). Airlines need planes, construction companies need equipment, and communications and hotel companies need infrastructure capacity. This compares with computers, drugs, biological products, educational services and electronics, all of which rely heavily on intellectual property to derive value. The conclusion that one

In short, the financial institution offered loans to virtually all customers, regardless of their ability to reimburse the loan. As the clients defaulted on their payments, the company found itself in an impossibility to recuperate its investments. Gradually, the value of its share decreased, the investors lost interest and confidence, their assets devalued and they were eventually forced to declare bankruptcy. The same situation was present and Merrill Lynch. 4.

Finance Time Value of Money; Assessing the Value of a Starbucks Bond The concept of the future value of money and the present value of money are useful when assessing potential investments. The future value of an investment is the value that the investor will expect to receive at some point in the future. If an investor is considering purchasing a Starbucks bond which will pay one $2,000 in a year's time,

Finance Question 1.a) Bond ratings encompass a wide range of elements related to the credit risk of the firm. Moody's notes that bond ratings include elements of default probability, loss severity, "financial strength" and "transition risk" (Cantor & Fons, 1999). The authors note that within the same sector, bonds of the same rating tend to be comparable both with respect to overall credit quality and specific credit quality characteristics. Over different

Functional Perspective Though financial systems change over time, their functional perspectives do not. Operational financial systems are expected to be similar in all economies, hence, its necessitated reliability in the system. A functional perspective is mainly used in doing financial analysis in a financial system. It provides a foundation for referring to a country's financial system. The financial perspective also assists in evaluating the system actions. Using a financial perspective in

Finance Cost of Capital The capital which is used by a firm, and shown n the balance can be divided into two main classifications; debt and equity. When a firm assesses its total cost of capital, this will usually be calculated on a weighted basis, using the costs of the different types of capital (Elliott and Elliott, 2011). An understanding of this can be appreciated by looking at some of the main