I agree with Harper (2009) on this, as well. Just scratching the surface of the financial statements will not help a person who is trying to invest in a company, because, as is often said, the devil is in the details. Something can look incredibly good on the first page and simply be terrible as one digs deeper into it. There might also be issues that a company has and that do not appear on the financial statements, but that is a risk that a lot of investors are willing to take if the financials look strong enough. Without being clear on how to examine the financial statements -- as well as what really matters to an investor and what does not -- it is possible to end up losing a great deal of money.
Knowing how to analyze financial statements does not guarantee investing success, though, and that is something that Harper (2009) could have stressed more clearly in the article. There are many people who write financial articles, and while they say that things are not guaranteed, they generally downplay that. People can lose money that way, even if they think that their knowledge will protect them. To his credit, though, Harper (2009) does say in his conclusion "Keep in mind the limitations of financial statements: they are backward-looking by definition, and you almost never want to dwell on a single statistic or metric."
He goes on to make a very important point:
" & #8230;U.S. accounting rules are always in flux. At any given...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now