First Amendment Case Study Jonathan Zaun The Essay

First Amendment Case Study Jonathan Zaun

The disputed legality of government sponsored religious displays is a matter which must be examined through the unclouded lens provided by the Establishment Clause of the Constitution's 1st amendment. This prohibition of state sanctioned or sponsored religious activity states expressly that governing bodies shall not support or endorse any religious viewpoint through either establishment or preferential treatment. In many instances, however, public displays have been erected under the auspices of government endorsement, displays which include direct religious references while purporting to espouse secular ideals. Legal precedent pertaining to the Constitutionality of public religious displays addresses the following legal issues regarding the dispute between the Church of the Albatross and Springfield citizens opposed to their planned construction of a religious statue: Should the common exception granted to religiously themed displays such Christmas decorations, displays which have been secularized and accepted by the community at large, be extended to the Albatross Church's proposed statue? Is the public forum provided by the town square, which is owned and operated by the Springfield municipal government, a legally permissible location for a religious monument? Should the Church's plan be protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment? For these issues...

...

Summum that the choice to displaying a monument in a public area is an example of governmental speech and is therefore not subject to the Free Speech Clause. Precedent holds that a local jurisdiction is within its rights to choose which, if any, privately donated monuments may be erected in public forums, so the onus falls on the government of Springfield to make its choice.
The fact that the town square typically displays Christmas and holiday decorations, as well as hosting groups of people singing religiously themed hymns and carols, is made irrelevant by the Court's decision in Lynch v. Donnelly. In Lynch, the Court held that holiday decorations are secular instruments celebrating the season rather than tools used to endorse a particular religious view. The Church's proposed statue, holding no purpose other than spreading awareness of the Albatross religion, simply does not pass Justice O'Connor's endorsement test. The Court ruled similarly in Allegheny v. ACLU when it found that the display of…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Allegheny County v. Greater Pittsburgh ACLU. No. 492 U.S. 573. Supreme Court of the United

States. 3 July 1989.

City of Elkhart v. William A. Books, et al. No. 532 U.S. 1058. Supreme Court of the United

States. 29 May 2001.


Cite this Document:

"First Amendment Case Study Jonathan Zaun The" (2011, April 28) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/first-amendment-case-study-jonathan-zaun-119434

"First Amendment Case Study Jonathan Zaun The" 28 April 2011. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/first-amendment-case-study-jonathan-zaun-119434>

"First Amendment Case Study Jonathan Zaun The", 28 April 2011, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/first-amendment-case-study-jonathan-zaun-119434

Related Documents

Endorsements Athletic apparel brands typically seek to secure athlete endorsements in order to enhance the value of their brand. As such, there are a few different criteria that they might apply when looking for athletes to act as their endorsers. Most athletic companies prefer to work with winning athletes, those who are among the world's best at what they do. At the core of this need is that the best athletes

Celebrity Endorsement Strategy: An Investigation Using Nike's relationship with Federer as an example, the paper analyzes the use of celebrity endorsement strategy of the brands beginning from choosing the right celebrity figures until the final results of the strategy. Many industries promote their products by hiring the services of influential celebrities who advertise the products in question. The celebrity has to have various characteristics in order to be seriously considered

Athletes in Scandal and Endorsement Deals All civilizations have celebrated the athletic achievements of their most accomplished citizens, from the ancient Greeks contesting the first Olympic Games to the jousting knights of medieval Europe, and societies have typically rewarded their most elite athletes with superior status, financial incentives, and social standing. Within the realm of modern American athletics, our nation's unique blend of personal liberty and capitalistic ambition has long created

By virtue of the fact that sports such as baseball and football in the United States had begun to prove themselves enormously popular and profitable, the intrusion of sponsorship and advertisement as a regular element of the game had begun a century ago. However, the paired evolution of the sports market to the coverage of an enormous breadth of market contexts and categories and of the media channels through

telemarketing fraud so rampant? The phone is increasingly being used "as a marketing tool and a vehicle for initial customer contact" (Michela, 1994, p. 556). Businesses make use of telemarketing applications in conducting political polling and market research, prospecting for new customers, making follow-ups on existing customers, advertising, raising charity funds, to mention but a few. Fraudsters take advantage of the increasing use of the phone and are aided by

Despite the mixed feelings of many on the issue, however, it seems as though Jeremy Bloom had his rights restricted very strongly by the NCAA, since there was no correlation between the football that he was playing at the University of Colorado and the skiing-related endorsements that he was receiving payment for. Bloom may have given up these rights when he enrolled in the University, but it is suspected that