Interest Based Bargaining Process And Purpose Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1625
Cite

Purpose of Interest Based Bargaining

The collective bargaining process is hardly ever dull or unexciting. Every now and then, there is significant tension as one of the participating parties or the other comes to the realization that it will fail to reach the expectations of its constituents. From time to time, there is significant eagerness and passion as resourceful options emanate with the potential to render mutual gains. In different occasions, apparently negligible or routine issues of contract terminology or working state of affairs have the potential to be fiery and tense on the basis of how they are addressed (Kochan and Lipsky, 2003). Interest based bargaining is founded on the ascertainment and determination of mutual interests instead of the resolution of specific bargaining demands. Interest based bargaining can be delineated as a process of solving problems that is conducted in a moral manner that generates efficacious solutions and at the same time enhancing the bargaining relationship.

Also referred to as integrative bargaining, this is a negotiation approach in which parties work in tandem to obtain a win-win solution to their disagreement or difference of opinion. This strategy lays emphasis on the development of mutually benefits settlements on the basis of the interests of those in dispute. These interests consist of the necessities, requests, worries, and uncertainties significant to every party. They are the fundamental reasons why individuals become involved in conflict. Interest-based takes into account the potential for the parties’ interests to be amalgamated in manners that generate mutual value or increase the win. The potential for integration solely subsists when there are manifold issues involved in the negotiation. This is for the reason that the parties have to have the capacity to make concessions across issues for both of the sides to be gratified with the final outcome (Sprangler, 2003).

The main emphasis of this particular bargaining strategy is to realize mutual bargaining interests with the main purpose of articulating choices and solutions for mutual achievement and gain. In this strategy, instead of making use of proposals as well as counter proposal was methods of reaching agreements, the participants in the bargaining process utilize active listening, brainstorming, process checking, unanimity decision making, as well as matrix building to facilitate and simplify the settling of issues. A fundamental...
...

To begin with, subsequent to attaining an agreement of their individual needs, goals, and interests, the parties attempt to comprehend the real requirements and objectives of their challengers. This is accomplished through discourse and exchange of ideas through which positions are amenably shared not influenced or concealed. A second process encompasses the parties creating a free flow of material and information by enlightening true goals, paying attention to their challengers cautiously, and accommodating a mutual solution that includes both positions. Third of all, there is the process of laying emphasis on the mutual ground between the parties and diminishing the dissimilarities. The distinct objectives of every party have to be taken into account as part of a collaborative endeavor to attain a greater objective. The last process encompasses the parties seeking and pursuing solutions that address and satisfy the goals and objectives of each of them. The results of interest based bargaining are measured by the magnitude to which the goals and objectives of each of the parties are met. In particular, if one of the party’s purposes to achieve more in comparison to the other, then the negotiation and bargaining will be challenging and will not be possible when both parties purpose to win (Kennedy, 1999).

Advantages of Interest Based Bargaining



One of the key advantages of interest-based bargaining is that both of the parties involved end up benefiting. Both of the sides end up in a win and win position. Secondly, within the labor or work setting, management is able to attain flexibility, peace amongst the workforces, increased prospects of executing challenging proposals, for instance, multiskilling and pay for performance, together with safety of labor supply. The inference of this is that management is not necessitated to create or form other facilities in the event of a work strike. Another advantage is that unions are able to attain increased employment steadiness and constancy for the membership, skills advancement, a superior say in making decisions, and augmented…

Cite this Document:

"Interest Based Bargaining Process And Purpose" (2017, November 06) Retrieved May 8, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/interest-based-bargaining-process-and-purpose-essay-2168637

"Interest Based Bargaining Process And Purpose" 06 November 2017. Web.8 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/interest-based-bargaining-process-and-purpose-essay-2168637>

"Interest Based Bargaining Process And Purpose", 06 November 2017, Accessed.8 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/interest-based-bargaining-process-and-purpose-essay-2168637

Related Documents

The issue of continuity of operations is an example. Kaiser could have stated this as a position - no strikes. However, their interest is not "no strikes" but rather a continuity of operations. The union could have responded to a position of "no strikes" by finding other means of protest, or by taking offense to the suggestion that they surrender one of their core rights. Rather, the union expressed

Negotiating Union Contracts Jonathan Zaun The relationship between a city or municipality and its various employee groups is often defined by the collective bargaining process which is used to formulate and finalize contracts between the two parties. From police and other law enforcement officials to firefighters and courthouse workers, city employees are often bound by the terms of contracts which are negotiated by their respective union representatives. The negotiation process between municipalities

Strikes in particular have been used as a bargaining chip during collective bargaining negotiations. Players unions can use the threat of a strike to motivate owners to capitulate to their demands. If this is unsuccessful, then players can follow through on their threat and effectively shut down the professional sports industry. For the human resources professional, the potential of a strike is a significant problem. It hinders the smooth and

Collective bargaining is made up of negotiations between an employer and a group of workers that decide the conditions of employment. Frequently workers are represented in the bargaining by a union or other labor association. The outcome of collective bargaining procedure comes in the form of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA). Collective agreements may be in the shape of procedural agreements or substantive agreements. Procedural agreements have to do

Inclusion of polarized differences within the so-called team in relation to the government of Rwanda was vital for the lack of agreement during the negotiations. Two-level game situation and chaotic structures led to the failure of the bargaining power of the government of Rwanda during the negotiation process. One of the eventual outcomes of the negotiation process was the composition of the national army with 50% from the Tutsis

If a violation of worker's rights occur, these unions can be contacted with complaints. Once again, if the worker's unions cannot resolve the problem adequately, consultation with higher authority figures is an option. 8. Being a unionized institution, collective bargaining is very much part of the employment process. This generally occurs at the departmental level. Generally, higher-level positions are filled by persons already employed by the University. The collective bargaining process