Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Proxy Warfare
Proxy war is an armed conflict between two actors or states, fighting on the behalf of other parties who are not directly engaged in the armed conflict. Proxies are typically supported by the other parties via funding, arming, training, or some other form of assistance. Nicaragua is a key legal case that highlights the problems that can arise from proxy warfare. As Heckman (2017) points out: In Nicaragua, the Court found that the United States was guilty of training, arming, equipping, financing and supplying the contra forces. It further found that the actions of the United States in and against Nicaragua created an international armed conflict (IAC) between Nicaragua and the United States.[footnoteRef:2] However, the Court also found that a non-international armed conflict (NIAC) was going on in the state of Nicaragua at the same time. Dinstein has also pointed out how incongruous such a ruling can be with reality: while the mere supply of arms by a foreign State to the insurgents might not necessarily lead to an IAC type of situation, there comes a point for instance, when the weapons are accompanied by instructors training the rebels at which the foreign State is deemed to be waging warfare against the local Government.[footnoteRef:3] Proxy wars continue all around today, with the war in Ukraine serving as one example, and Irans proxy wars for expansion as another. Indeed, the war in Ukraine and Irans proxy wars can serve as modern case study examples of the problems of proxy war from a legal point of view. This paper aims to compare the Iranian proxy wars with the war in Ukraine to see how proxy war is defined and determined today. [2: Nicaragua, supra note 14, paras. 292(3)-(4)] [3: Dinstein, War, Aggression and Self-Defence, supra note 70, p. 10.]
References
Berti, B., & Guzansky, Y. (2014). Saudi Arabia's Foreign Policy on Iran and the Proxy
War in Syria: Toward a New Chapter?Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs,8(3), 25-34.
This paper examines Syria as a proxy war between Iran and enemy states and helps to provide context for this subject.
Case Concerning the Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua
(Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment, International Court of Justice, 27 June 1986
This case will help provide a blueprint for how to examine proxy war from a legal standpoint.
Dinstein, Yoram. 2012. War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edition.
This book provides insight into the legality of proxy…
Syria I believe that the United States should not get involved militarily in Syria. There are too many risks involved, and no real reward for the U.S. Involvement in that country's civil war would endanger U.S. interests in the region significantly, put U.S. lives on the line and would accomplish nothing with respect to the country's strategic objectives in the region. For the past several years, Syria has been embroiled in a
As this paper has already implied, U.S. policy concerning Syria is only the tip of an iceberg -- as Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad has intimated, and as the PNAC papers and President G.W. Bush himself have blatantly revealed. Yet, the Bush Administration continually relied on scare tactics, bogus intelligence, and empty nationalistic slogans to offer to the American public a justification for its opposition to Syria. Conflict Theory is also
Syria I am Osmane Arslanian, Ambassador of the Syrian Arab Republic to the United Nations Organization, and I am deeply privileged to speak about my country and its people. Syria first referred to the land of Aram East of the Mediterranean Sea between Egypt and Arabia to the south and Cilicia to the north, crossing inland, including Mesopotamia (Wikipedia 2004) and from west to east Commagene, Sophene and Adiabene, or what was
The presence of the Iranian nuclear problem on the agenda of the Security Council and as a topic for all discussions between heads of states has determined a reluctant attitude in terms of the way in which Iran conducts both its foreign and internal affairs. Despite the fact that Turkey is reluctant to create a situation in which Syria would eventually depend on the support of the Iranian side,
In Chapter 1 of this report, the authors pose several important questions -- first, "How much have MENA countries invested in human capital through education?" within the past forty years, and second, "What has been the impact of this investment on the level, quality and distribution of human capital?" (the Road Not Traveled, 9). In order to answer these questions, we must consult a number of tables in the
Syria vs. Egypt -- Compare & Contrast While Egypt and Syria are both very prominent and on the front page of the news all the time around the world, the countries are quite different overall and this includes the path they took when it comes to their history and developments over the years. This paper will compare and contrast how they countries are different right now and how they have changed