Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Cnut the Great may very well be one of the most emblematic personages of the Medieval Ages. King of Denmark, Norway and partly of Sweden and, from 1016, of England, he was an influential figure in his time, unfortunately, shadowed nowadays by a collective memory that renders him a madman, due to the myth that Cnut had tried to demonstrate his power by allegedly seeking to command the waves of the sea. No one really knows how this myth came into being, and the king himself acknowledged more than once that no one, not even a king, is above God's power. What's more, after he became a Christian, Cnut never wore his crown again and instead laid it on a crucifix.
After his father's death, Cnut was chosen as king and he undoubtedly managed to expand his father's territories into a huge northern empire. Henry of Huntingdon first mentioned the myth of the tide in his Chronicle regarding the history of England. It is there that he also mentioned how Cnut had ?conducted himself gracefully and magnificently? In paving his way to success. Indeed, Huntingdon was right about this king's ?wide-ranging authority....
(apud Sommerville UW) Cnut had been wise in marrying the widow of Ethelred whose sons had been the former's rivals in obtaining the throne. When in 1018, he is being paid the last Donegeld tax, Cnut goes on becoming the king of Denmark and Norway, a legacy that would, along with his strong personality, contribute to his instauration of an empire. He wisely ruled in bringing prosperity and by respecting the Church and he managed to nurture the arts, commerce and justice. Indeed, in his time, London is said to have been ?the chief centre in northern Europe for the composition and distribution of skaldic poetry? (Mason 31). Now, this may appear as something rather trivial when it comes to exposing a king's accomplishments, but let us bear in mind that for a kingdom to indulge in such art related practices, it would mean the necessary factors were available to sustain them. Therefore, we must admit beyond historical evidence that Cnut managed to obtain an economic level that allowed for such a flow of arts within his dominion.
However, Cnut was not always the king we have come…
Works Cited
Larson, Laurence M. Political Policies of Cnut as King of England. The American Historical Review 15: 720-743. Web. 7. July 2013. [http://archive.org/details/jstor-1836956]
Mason, Emma. The House of Godwine: The History of a Dynasty. London, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.
Sommerville, J.P. King Canute (=Cnut) and the Waves. University of Wisconsin. Web. 7 July 2013.
King Canute is one of the most important and greatest figures in history and was commonly known as King Canute I of England, Norway's King Canute, and King Canute II of Denmark. This significance of this king is attributed to his fame for conquering large parts of England and establishing a formidable but short-lived empire after conquering Norway and Denmark. Moreover, King Canute is renowned as one of the greatest
shape and to create our modern world? The modern world was shaped by a range of events and powerful people. One of the first most influential people was Clovis. Clovis was the founder of the Merovingian dynasty of Frankish kings, and one who defeated the Roman rule in Gaul along with defeating a range of Germanic people, creating the kingdom that is known as France nowadays. Most notably, it was
Conquest At the time of the Norman Conquest, monarchy in England was an inherently unstable institution. Howarth's account of the throne in the years leading up to 1066 paints a picture of a curious institution: without fixed laws of succession, and with no more fixed governmental assembly than the witana gemot, the English Crown at this point in time seems more like a chieftancy for a society in transition. I
A journal entry from that era wrote "you do remember it: cholera was everything; it had absorbed everything, politics, uprisings, theater, intrigues" (Delacroix, ca 1832). The effects of the July Monarchy would be far-flung and its effects would be felt for decades to come. Child labor laws were enacted, the free press was virtually legislated out of business, and there was an abundance of 'reform' including the establishment of elementary
The history of Indian and European scalping) Another factor that should be considered in the discussion of the origins of European scalping traditions is the evidence in etymology. There is evidence of the prior knowledge and use of scalping in the original usage and understanding of the word ' scalping'. The noun "scalp" (from a Scandinavian root) existed in English long before the seventeenth century. It had two meanings of different ages.
Therefore, Islamic monarchies did not make claims of actual divinity. Despite their differences, Christian and Islamic theocracies shared the same concept of expansion. Central to both religions was the concept that world religious domination was a religious and political duty. In fact, while crusading is now associated solely with Christianity, the fact is that early crusading began with Islamic crusades in the early middle Ages. The Islamic crusades and the