Nursing Research Describe the Population

Nursing Research Describe the population for this study. The population for this study consisted of three hundred and twenty nine hospice homecare patients suffering from cancer along with those who took care of them. They were randomly put into three groups. A control group consisting of 109 people getting typical care, a group of 109 people getting typical treatment plus sociable appointments, and a grouping of 111 people getting typical care in addition to the COPE involvement.

How was the sample selected? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this sampling strategy? The sample for the present study was obtained from a large nonprofit hospice where most patients got home care. Founded on control computations, one hundred and sixty patient-caregiver dyads were wanted for each set. All compliant patient caregiver dyads that met insertion criterion were incorporated into the research. Participants had to be adults with a diagnosis of cancer and a recognized family caretaker, and both had to consent.

All participants and caretakers had to have at minimum a sixth-grade education and be capable of reading and comprehending English, have a bare minimum score of seven on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire and have a bare minimum score of forty on the Palliative Performance Scale. Strength in this sampling strategy lies in that the researcher is guaranteed to get subjects that meet the research criteria. A weakness to this type is that there is a jeopardy of creating a prejudice even before the study begins.

3) Were the subjects in this study vulnerable? Were there any risks for them as the result of participation in the research study? The subjects in this study were vulnerable because of the fact that they were suffering from cancer. There were no apparent risks involved for them participating in this study as it was carried out in order to see if certain procedures reduced their signs and symptoms.

4) Are there any HIPAA concerns that are evident in this study? As long as the informed consent forms included all the pertinent information regarding the research study and each element was explained to each participant then there would not be any evident HIPPA concerns in regards to this study. 5) What methods were put in place to ensure that the subjects were giving true informed consent? All consenting patient caregiver dyads that met insertion criterion were incorporated in the study.

Participants had to be adults with a diagnosis of cancer and an identified relative caregiver, and both had to consent. Qualified patient-caregiver dyads were acknowledged originally by the RA data collector nurses at the commencement of each day. Throughout the visit, the study was explained and both patient and caregiver consent was acquired. Instruction also was given for the RA data collector nurse and the RA data collector HHA concerning how to recognize and screen subjects, how to give details about the study and how to obtain consent.

6) What was the setting for the study? This study was conducted in a large nonprofit hospice that provided home care. 7) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected? There is no standard number that is considered adequate when designing a research study. In this study there were three groups all with approximately the same number of participants. This appears to be a reasonable way to set this study up in order to get valid results.

If not enough subjects are chosen then the results will not be reliable and if too many are chosen the time and cost of the study increases greatly. 8) Describe the population for this study. The current study used secondary qualitative analysis in order to look at the original data set but yet answer a different research issue.

In order to better understand women's understanding of unforeseen and upsetting indications in the time after dynamic cancer management, this qualitative secondary examination looked at how women looked at unforeseen and upsetting indication practices. Re-examination of phenomenological statistics from the first author's investigation on survivor loneliness exposed adequate knowledge in order to conduct this secondary data analysis.

9) How was the sample selected? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this sampling strategy? Subjects were enlisted from a list of volunteers at Reach for Recovery, a cancer survivors' system supported by the American Cancer Society (ACS). The study consisted of 13 English-speaking women, who were 33 -- 74 years of age, who had finished vigorous care for breast cancer in the previous 18 years prior to the study.

Safety of human being subjects as well as model explanation was detailed in the original article 10) Were the subjects in this study vulnerable? Were there any risks for them as the result of participation in the research study? The subjects in this study were vulnerable in the fact that they were suffering from cancer. There were no apparent risks for the subjects in participating in this study as is was carried out using secondary analysis of data that was obtained in the first study.

11) Are there any HIPAA concerns that are evident in this study? There are no HIPPA concerns evident in this study as long as participation in the original study was HIPPA compliant. It is assumed that proper HIPPA procedures were followed in the gathering of the original data.

12) What methods were put in place to ensure that the subjects were giving true informed consent? Since this was a secondary analysis of data that was gathered for another study there is no way of knowing what methods were used to make sure that true informed consent was obtained. It can be assumed that the proper procedures were followed in the original study. 13) What was the setting for the study? This study consisted of a secondary analysis of data that was collected.