Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Prosecutors' Duties
Prosecutors are governed by a set of stringent ethical and legal rules meant to reinforce their justice-seeking duty, in addition to helping them fulfill their roles as advocates (Kurcias, 2000). One of these is the Brady Rule, which requires the disclosure, by the prosecutor, to the defense, of all materially exculpatory (Brady) evidence in the possession of the state (Kurcias, 2000). Brady evidence refers to any material that would either go towards negating the guilt of the defendant and thereby reducing his potential sentence, or towards a witness' credibility. In a jury trial, the prosecutor is required to "disclose such evidence to the grand jury before seeking an indictment against" the defendant (Sands et al., n.d., p. 12).
The prosecutor's failure to disclose such material could lead to the automatic suppression of evidence, especially if prejudice has ensued as a result (Kurcias, 2000). In such a case, suppression will occur whether or not the prosecution i) was aware that the evidence was in its possession or ii) acted in good faith (Kurcias, 2000). This is because such an action...
1214). The defendant only has to prove the materiality of the undisclosed (Kurcias, 2000).
The failure to disclose exculpatory evidence amounts to prosecutorial misconduct. Other significant forms of prosecutorial misconduct during a criminal prosecution include; subpoenas to the defense counsel, pre-indictment contact with represented witnesses, and miscellaneous prosecutorial misconduct within the jury (Sands et al., n.d.). Prosecutorial misconduct could have serious consequences. A good example is the case of the United States vs. Ramming, 915F Supp.854 (S.D. Texas 1996), where "the District Court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct," after it was revealed that the prosecutor had withheld hearsay evidence favorable to the defendant (Sands et al., n.d.).
The Brady Rule is aimed at protecting a defendant's constitutional right to fair trial. In a jury trial, the selection of a fair and impartial jury, and the observance of the defendant's trial…
References
Kurcias, L.M. (2000). Prosecutor's Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence." Fordham Law Review, 69(3), 1205-1229.
Sands, J., Miles, C. Kalar, S., Davids, P., Hansen, G. & Katchen, J. (n.d.). Prosecutorial Misconduct. FD. Retrieved from http://www.fd.org/docs/select-topics/ethics/prosecutorial-misconduct.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
Prosecutors and Victims The criminal justice system has granted prosecutors significant discretion to exercise their powers and liberty in identifying crimes that should be prosecuted. The discretion given to prosecutors emerges from public policy and the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers. Some of the factors that influence prosecutors' discretion when making decisions on crimes to be prosecuted include seriousness of the offense, existing evidence, and prosecutorial evidence. However, one of
Special Duties of Prosecutors One of the major differentiating aspects of the United States of America is the fact that if arrested, you are innocent until proven guilty. This is a rare concept among legal systems. Most countries deem the suspect guilty until proven innocent. In the United States, it is the duty of the Prosecutor to find the defendant guilty, while the defense attorney is solely responsible for upholding his
offices in the judicial system, e.g. prosecutor, private attorney, public defender, and comparatively discuss the origin, development, behavior and relatedness of each to the other person would be considered till such a time, innocent of a crime, in the U.S. judicial system when he or she would be proved found guilty in a court of law by a jury of peers or common citizens. On the functioning of the
Cannibal Cop" -- When does evil thought become a crime? Gilbert Valle III was a 28-year-old former New York City police officer who was arrested after his wife reveled to authorities that he was obsessed with the idea of kidnapping women, torturing them, raping them then eating their flesh. His wife had come upon his computer record of his visits to chat rooms (including "Dark Fetish Net") that deal in unspeakably
instant case are typical of many criminal cases presented to the courts on a daily basis and the role and responsibilities of the principals remain essentially the same. The prosecutor in the case has the primary duty to ensure that justice is done. This duty applies not only to the victim, but also applies as to the defendant. In the instant case this requires that the prosecutor make every
Officer Accountability A police officer's proven dishonesty is not a minor matter. Ignoring or covering up that dishonesty, if discovered, could be devastating to the police department's credibility. Furthermore, due to Due Process laws in the United States, his/her dishonesty could affect the outcome of past cases in which he/she testified and future cases in which he/she may testify. Finally, the prosecution is required to hand that information to defendants' attorneys.