Public Sector Performance Measurement Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1573
Cite

For the public sector, performance management is a valuable process. Organizations increasingly rely on performance data to make decisions relating to various organizational processes, including strategic planning, internal management, resource allocation, reporting, as well as monitoring and evaluation. This is what performance management is all about -- continuous measurement of performance, definition of performance objectives and outcomes, communication of the outcomes, and taking action based on those outcomes. As demonstrated by literature, implementing PBM can be viewed as implementing organizational change: it requires assessment of the status quo, defining the organization's desired future state, and undertaking action to achieve that state. For this to be achieved, however, a number of factors are important: strong leadership commitment, organizational culture changes, as well as attention to individual, operational, and strategic dimensions. If effectively implemented, PBM can positively influence employee and organizational outcomes.

Performance Management: Brief Literature Review



With the operational environment becoming ever more competitive, and against the backdrop of austerity in resource management, the importance of performance-based management (PBM) cannot be overemphasized. Indeed, PBM has increasingly become a common practice in organizations of different sizes -- small and large -- and in diverse sectors -- manufacturing and service, as well as public and private sectors (Ploom & Haldma, 2013; Lutwama, Roos & Dolamo, 2013; Rivenbank, Fasiello & Adamo, 2016; Wierzbinski, 2016). This paper presents a brief review of literature relating to performance management. The review is based on various types of sources, including conceptual articles, systematic reviews, as well as primary studies (case studies, surveys, and mixed methods studies). Following a comprehensive definition of PBM, attention is paid to the impact of PBM and employee and organizational outcomes, as well as PBM implementation, antecedents, and key success factors.

What is PBM



Defining PBM can be quite problematic, with the term being often confused with performance measurement (Rivenbank, Fasiello & Adamo, 2016). In addition, performance management is often thought to involve only personnel management processes such as employee performance appraisal (Turk, 2016). Furthermore, contention exists over whether it should...
...

Also, referred to as results or outcome-based management, performance management is an umbrella term which includes a number of ongoing organizational processes: setting and clarifying objectives, establishing performance indicators, gathering and analyzing data, reporting outcomes, and learning from the outcomes (Woerrlein & Scheck, 2016). This means that performance measurement is an element of PBM. Brudan (2010) describes performance measurement as a sub-process of PBM, which focuses on identifying, monitoring, and communicating performance outcomes, and taking action based on those outcomes. PBM processes are ultimately aimed at driving performance. Based on management control theory, PBM is about evaluating outcomes with the aim of creating value for the end consumer and other important stakeholders (Pihl-Thingvad, 2017).
PBM processes relate to not only individuals or employees, but also organizational processes (Brudan, 2010). Indeed, performance-based management means that all organizational processes, internally and externally, are pegged on performance or results -- from personnel management to supply chain management. Selviaridis & Wynstram (2015), for instance, demonstrate the relevance of PBM in supplier management. PBM determines aspects such as supplier payment, incentive design, performance specification, and risk allocation. For example, Rolls Royce, a manufacturer of aircraft components, is paid for providing maintenance services on the basis of engine availability in flight hours as opposed to labor and spare part cost. In the service context, logistics providers are increasingly being paid based on the performance of the client's supply chain. In essence, PBM is about outcomes. The organization first determines the outcomes it desires to achieve and then determines the means for achieving those outcomes. This is unlike the conventional approach, wherein means lead to outcomes.

PBM and Employee and Organizational Outcomes



A major focus of PBM research relates to the impact of PBM on employee and organizational outcomes. Focusing on higher education institutions, Turk (2016) demonstrates that performance management is important for improving staff performance, especially during organizational change. It achieves this by aligning performance management processes with the organization's strategic goals…

Cite this Document:

"Public Sector Performance Measurement" (2017, April 22) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/public-sector-performance-measurement-essay-2168208

"Public Sector Performance Measurement" 22 April 2017. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/public-sector-performance-measurement-essay-2168208>

"Public Sector Performance Measurement", 22 April 2017, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/public-sector-performance-measurement-essay-2168208

Related Documents

Public Program Evluation: Quality Performance Measurement Annotated Bibliography Caiden, GE and Caiden, NJ (nd) Measuring Performance in Public Sector Programs. Public Administration and Public Policy. Vol. II. Retrieved from: http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c14/E1-34-05-06.pdf Caiden and Caiden (nd) report that the link between reforms and public measurement and evaluation were not merely chance since as the reforms developed devolution was emphasized or the moving of functions and services to the government levels that were lower, along with

Public Private Comparator Public Sector Comparator (PSC) in the Public-private partnership (PPP) Process Increased global financial pressures have caused many government entities to cut costs in any way possible. One way is to outsource services or projects to private companies. However, when comparing costs, the public sector frequently bases its cost calculations for a project by omitting certain types of factors. These can include employee benefits, utilities, or total administrative costs. As

It relies on the vision of the state you choose to subscribe and it depends upon the costs and benefits of a few highly imperfect social institutions: market trends and the public sector. (Bovaird, Loffler, 2003, p. 25) The public sector is a ubiquitous social institution having grown in size and complexity within the last fifty years. Nevertheless, this is a linear development. Whereas the development belonging to the

Management Account in the Public Sector and Management Accounting in the Private Sector: A Comparative Review The late 20th and early 21st centuries have brought increasing change to almost every country in the world, Australia included. Globalism describes, in fact, the increasing unification of the world through economic means (reduction of trade barriers, support of international trade, and mitigation of export and import quotas). They goal for globalization is to increase

Performance Measurement
PAGES 4 WORDS 1217

Quality Performance Measurement Public Evaluation Program In this paper, we are going to be conducting a literature review of public evaluation programs. During the process, there is a focus on misunderstanding the needs of stakeholders and the programs / reforms. Together, these elements will illustrate the overall scope of what is taking place and the long-term effects it is having on everyone. Misunderstanding the Needs of the Public One of the biggest challenges with

Benchmarking occurs in a cycle with the first step stated as crucial and involving "planning and target setting." (cited in Rondo-Brovetto and Saliterer, 2007) the second step is stated as comparison and analysis with the third step being 'action' followed by the fourth step of 'evaluation'. The benchmarking cycle then repeats itself. (Rondo-Brovetto and Saliterer, 2007) III. Preferred type of Leader & When the Autocratic Leader is preferable and more Efficient The