Traffic Stop In the example, four men of unidentified race, acting in an unpredictable way in a marginal area of a city, fled in a car when asked simple questions by police. The police pursued, pulled them over, questioned them, and found that their stories did not seem truthful. Items found in the car were eventually connected to a crime.

According to LaFave (2004), the only issue in such a case is whether the traffic stop was legitimate or not (LaFave, 2004). To establish that, the police must have "probable cause." In this case, the officers suspected that the men may have engaged in a crime, but were essentially acting on a hunch. LaFave illustrates that such traffic stops meet such probable cause even when the evidence is not clear. Other rulings have demonstrated that during this stop, officers can ask questions of the occupants of the car, and that these initial questions do not constitute an "interrogation. Called a "Terry Stop" based on a famous case, they fall short of questioning done after an arrest, and do not require Mirandizing the individuals being questioned (LaFave, 2004). The Terry case ruled that whether initial questioning turns into questioning that should have been Mirandized depends on the length of time the individuals were questioned and whether the questioning was justified. In this case, the indications are that as soon as the officers believed they were not getting truthful answers, they did Mirandize and...

Royer), the court ruled that the investigative detention (questioning the individuals without an arrest or Mirandizing) must be short and limited to the purpose of the stop, and that this investigation must be as non-intrusive as possible in order to answer the questions that caused the stop (LaFave, 2004). In this case, the officers may have had more leeway. Although they did stop a moving car, they did not do it because of a traffic violation but because the occupants fled when faced with a Terry interrogation. LaFave goes on to explain that when the stop was made because the occupants were suspected of having committed a crime, the courts have supported the idea that the officers must take that into consideration when questioning (LaFave, 2004). Again, the officers did this by providing their results under Miranda early in the stop.
In fact, rulings have established that the police may question people who are simply walking down the street (LaFave, 2004), so the situation these men were in, in an area not typically occupied by people simply standing around on the street, has more justification. However, there are restrictions. The city of Chicago, as part of its efforts to combat…