Smith and Wesson IFE (Internal Factor Evaluation) Matrix and Summary Founded in 1852, Smith and Wesson regards itself a market leader as far as innovation is considered in the manufacture of firearms. During its 165 years in the firearm manufacturing industry, the company has developed a wide range of pistols, starting with the volcanic pistol in 1852 to the...
The evaluation essay is one of the more common types of advanced academic writing. While a basic research paper or essay asks a student to gather and present information, the evaluation essay goes a step further by asking students to draw conclusions from the information they have...
Smith and Wesson IFE (Internal Factor Evaluation) Matrix and Summary
Founded in 1852, Smith and Wesson regards itself a market leader as far as innovation is considered in the manufacture of firearms. During its 165 years in the firearm manufacturing industry, the company has developed a wide range of pistols, starting with the volcanic pistol in 1852 to the M&P M2.0 pistol in 2017, with the latter being regarded a masterpiece as far as “grip, frame, and finish” is concerned (Smith and Wesson, 2017).
Table 1.0: IFE Matrix of Smith & Wesson
Strengths
Weight
Rating
Weighted Score
Excellent production quality
Significant market share
Brand image
Innovation
Strong and consistent growth in revenues
Well-founded R&D
Strong managerial team
Weaknesses
High manufacturing cost
Large portion of revenues drawn from U.S. market
Dependence on a single revenue stream i.e. firearm manufacture only
Total Weight Score
The IFE matrix, in the words of Lodato (2014), “is a tool to help in evaluating the internal environment of the business by visualizing and evaluating major strengths and weaknesses in functional areas of a business” (p. 99). The IFE Matrix of Smith and Wesson came in handy as I sought to evaluate the internal environment of the firearms maker with an aim of revealing both its strengths and weaknesses. In essence, this analysis demonstrates that as far as the assessment of an entity’s strengths and weaknesses is concerned, IFE matrix remains a key tool in strategic management. From the assessment above it is easy to draw associations between various factors.
According to Lodato (2014), 2.5 is regarded to be the average weighted score – effectively meaning that an entity with a total weighted score in excess of 2.5 is seen as being in a better position as far as its internal strength is concerned. On the other hand, an entity reporting a score lower than 2.5 is considered to be in a worse position with regard to internal strength. In that regard, therefore, with a total weight score of 3.04, Smith & Wesson cannot be regarded weak internally.
On the basis of this exercise, it should be noted that in the final analysis, the relevance of IFE matrix when it comes to the formulation of strategy cannot be overstated. However, it is important to note that on its own, the IFE matrix lacks significant value as far as the sound formulation of strategy is concerned. In that regard, therefore, it ought to be combined with other strategic management and assessment tools including, but not limited to, the EFE (external factors evaluation) matrix and the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis.
The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.
Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.