Health Insurance Exchange: State versus Federal
According to Goldstein (2018), ever since the ACA has been in effect, states with their own healthcare exchanges have fared significantly better than those who simply rely upon the federal exchange. States have greater flexibility in advertising directly to potential enrollees and can extend the signup period. The local flexibility also means that consumers can receive more personalized help, given that state exchanges are only responsible for informing a smaller pool of individuals about the confusing process of signing up and selecting insurance (Goldstein, 2018). On the other hand, it is also important to be realistic about the extent of a state exchange to fundamentally help consumers. State exchanges cannot ignore federal requirements that insurance policies must meet certain stipulated standards and have mandatory enrollment, regardless of consumers’ preexisting conditions.
As a result, premiums are expected to go up, regardless, and there are fears that the limited choice available on the exchanges will mean that some consumers will elect to go without insurance, regardless of the penalty they must pay, versus pay for prohibitively high-cost coverage (Archambault, 2013). But given that premiums are likely to increase, that is all the more reason to accept the Medicaid expansion for the state. More people, including the middle-class, will need support to pay what can be prohibitive monthly costs.
As a result, the state needs to step in, even if it proves to be expensive. Consumers are likely to blame the leadership if they see prices increase and they are not given assistance. Also, this may mean families become reliant upon other sources of financial aid, if they are not able to pay their premiums. Even if the state is making due with fewer resources, reaching out to healthcare providers and nonprofits within the industry may be useful. These stakeholders can help provide assistance in advising the state how to set up the exchange and engage in outreach efforts to community members throughout the sign-in process.
References
Archambault, J. (2013). Do premiums differ in states with a state-based exchange versus federal exchange under Obamacare? Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/11/12/do-premiums-differ-in-states- with-a-state-based-exchange-versus-federal-exchange-under-obamacare/#497a457059d8
Goldstein, A. (2018). ACA’s state-run insurance exchanges fare better than the law’s federal marketplace. The Washington Post. Retrieved from:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/acas-state-run-insurance- exchanges-fare-better-than-the-laws-national-marketplace/2018/02/07/7a0d73b6-0b77- 11e8-8890-372e2047c935_story.html?utm_term=.a6a78877de4e
Health Care Reform Federal Deficit The American Health Care Crisis and the Federal Deficit The United States spends more than any other country on medical care. In 2006, U.S. health care spending was $2.1 trillion, or 16% of our gross domestic product. At the same time, more than 45 million Americans lack health insurance and our health outcomes (life expectancy, infant mortality, and mortality amenable to health care) are mediocre compared with
Healthcare Institutions Financial Environments Paper Healthcare institutions: Nonprofit, for-profit, and government-administered "Three types of entities -- nonprofit, for-profit, and government" exist within the American healthcare industry (Horowitz 2015). All available evidence indicates that this status affects the business model choice of all of these institutions. "In this econometric analysis of American Hospital Association data for every U.S. urban, acute care hospital (1988 -- 2000), more than thirty services were categorized as relatively profitable,
payer healthcare systems: Pros and cons One of the most controversial concepts in American health care is the idea of single-payer health insurance, or the notion that healthcare will be supported by taxpayer dollars, versus funded by private insurance companies. In many Western industrialized nations such as the United Kingdom and Canada, the concept of single payer-health insurance is the norm and embraced by the majority of the population. In
Stakeholder in U.S. Health Care System Health care stakeholders in the U.S.A. US Healthcare System consist of different stakeholders who have their role to play in making sure there is a smooth running and efficient provision of services. These stakeholders become involved within the healthcare system in different stages and perspective. Their aim is to shape the U.S. health care system to ensure more quality services are provided to the citizens. One of
components of value-based purchasing (VBP) that are most pertinent to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) based on its vital mission to provide high-quality health care services to the nation's veterans while identifying opportunities to reduce costs and improve efficiencies in ways that promote improved clinical outcomes in measurable ways. The study also describes the three departments of a VA medical center that will be most important in
Affordable Care Act decreased the number of Americans without health insurance by the millions, which was its primary objective. It used three different mechanisms to achieve this goal -- the expansion of Medicaid, the insurance exchanges, and the extension of coverage to young adults up to age 26. These changes have also helped to stem the growth of health care costs, and have delivered greater health care savings throughout the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now