This work examines working capital and its theoretical constructs and contributes to the Effectiveness to Advancce Financial Management Practice. The term ‘working capital' is reported in the work of Seidman (2004) to have several meanings "in business and economic development finance. In accounting and financial statement analysis, working capital is defined as the firm's short-term or current assets and current liabilities. Net working capital represents the excess of current assets over current liabilities and is an indicator of the firm's ability to meet its short term financial obligations." (Seidman, 2004)
Management System -- Working Capital Management
Working Capital: Theoretical Construct & Contribution to the Effectiveness to Advance Financial Management Practice
This work examines working capital and its theoretical constructs and contributes to the Effectiveness to Advancce Financial Management Practice. The term 'working capital' is reported in the work of Seidman (2004) to have several meanings "in business and economic development finance. In accounting and financial statement analysis, working capital is defined as the firm's short-term or current assets and current liabilities. Net working capital represents the excess of current assets over current liabilities and is an indicator of the firm's ability to meet its short-term financial obligations." (Seidman, 2004)
Introduction
The objective of this study is to conduct a critical review of the relevant literature in terms of its theoretical construct and its contribution and effectiveness in advancing financial management practice. The term 'working capital' is stated in the work of Seidman (2004) to have several meanings "in business and economic development finance. In accounting and financial statement analysis, working capital is defined as the firm's short-term or current assets and current liabilities. Net working capital represents the excess of current assets over current liabilities and is an indicator of the firm's ability to meet its short-term financial obligations."
I. Defining 'Working Capital'
Seidman (2004) additionally states that from the view of financing that working capital "refers to the firms' investment in two types of assets. In one instance, working capital means a business's investment in short-term assets needed to operate over a normal business cycle." Seidman states that this 'corresponds to the required investment in cash, accounts receivable, inventory, and other items listed as current assets on the firm's balance sheet." (2004) According to Seidman, in this context, "working capital financing concerns how a firm finances its current assets." (2004) Seidman reports a "second broader meaning of working capital" stating that it is specifically the "overall no fixed asset investments" of the company. (2004)
Businesses many times need to finance activities that do not involve measurement of assets on the balance sheet. The example stated is when the firm has a requirement for funding for the purpose of product redesign or for the purpose of formulation of a new strategy for marketing which makes a requirement of funds for personnel hiring rather than for asset acquisition accounting purposes. Seidman reports that these investments are 'soft costs' in that there is no immediate return but instead the returns are such that are realized over time. (Seidman, 2004, paraphrased) Working capital therefore is representative of a broader range of the capital needs of the firm and is inclusive of both current and nonfixed asset investments relating to the company operations. (Seidman, 2004, paraphrased)
III. Management of Working Capital Risk and Return
The work of Trainor and Webzel (2010) entitled "Managing Working Capital Risk and Return" relates that the impact of working capital risk and return on higher education in terms of liquidity include that not all market-like funds were liquid and marketable securities were not as marketable as expected. In addition, some investments liquidate at a price that is discounted deeply and investment managers imposed new liquidity gates and collateral postings were required. Finally, it is stated that capital calls were not offset of alternative funds distributions. (Trainor and Webzel, 2010)
In terms of debt the impact of management of working capital risk and return include that demand debt remarketing failed and the variable interest expense is rising and the fees for letters of credit. Finally collateral posting and liquidation swaps incurred penalties. Further impacting higher education in the area of working capital risk and return management is that operating budgeting cuts took place due to weak performance of investments. (Trainor and Webzel, 2010, paraphrased) It is possible to balance risk and reward through a "tiered approach to working capital management" because this approach is reported to make allowance for a "custom cash investment strategy to fit the investor's risk tolerance and liquidity requirements and preservation of capital needs and the ability to combine liquidity with the opportunity for yield enhancement by moving away from money market strategies to other short-term strategies." (Trainor and Webzel, 2010)
IV. Relationship Between Working Capital Management and Profitability
The work of Dong and Su (2010) examines the relationship existing between working capital management and profitability and states that the working capital management "plays an important role for success or failure of firm in business because of its effect on firm's profitability as well on liquidity." The assets of a firm are inclusive of: (1) fixed assets; and (2) current assets. (Dong and Su, 2010) Fixed assets are inclusive of land, building, plant, furniture and so forth. The firm's investment sin these assets means that some of the capital of the firm is "permanently blocked on a permanent or fixed basis and is also called fixed capital that generates productive capacity." (Dong and Su, 2010) It is reported that there is no change in the form of these assets however, "current assets consisting of raw materials, work-in -- progress, finished goods, bills receivables and material into semi=finished products, semi-finished products into finished products, finished products into debtors and debtors turned over cash or bills receivables." (Dong and Su, 2010)
Dong and Su relate in their study that the firm's fixed assets are increasingly used in production of organization and used in the fixed assets "for day-to-day working. Therefore, the current assets, called capital, may be regarded as the lifeblood of a business enterprise…" and is reported to refer to "that part of the capital and to be such that is a requirement in short-term financing." (Dong and Su, 2010) Management of working capital is inclusive of "planning and controlling current assets and current liabilities in a manner that eliminates the risk of inability to meet due short-term obligations on the one hand and avoid excessive investment in these assets on the other hand." (Dong and Su, 2010)
Working capital management is held as "one of the most important issues in organization, where many financial managers are finding it difficult to identify the important drivers of working capital and the optimum level of working capital. As a result, companies can minimize risk and improve their overall performance if they can understand the role and determinants of working capital. A firm may choose an aggressive working capital management policy with a low level of current assets as percentage of total assets, or it may also be used for the financing decisions of the firm in the form of high level of current liabilities as percentage of total liabilities." (Dong and Su, 2010) It is critical that an optimal balance be kept "among each of the working capital components" and this is the primary objective of management of working capital. (Dong and Su, 2010, paraphrased) The ability of the financial managers in effectively managing receivables, inventory, and payments is that determining the success of the business in large part. (Dong and Su, 2010, paraphrased)
Dong and Su go on to relates that it is possible for the firm to realize a decrease in financing costs as well as raise the available funds for protections involving expansion through minimization of the amount of investment tied up in current assets and it was reported in Lamgberson (1995) that the largest part of the time and efforts of financial managers are the identification of the "non-optimal levels of current assets and liabilities and bring them up to optimal levels." (Dong and Su, 2010) One popular method of measuring the firm's working capital management is stated to be that of the "cash conversion cycle, which is defined as the sum of days of sales outstanding (average collection period) and days of sales in inventory less days of payables outstanding." (2006)
The longer the time lag the larger working capital investment will be. Dong and Su, 2010) Dong and Su state that their research provides support for the findings that a "a strong negative relationship between the measures of working capital management and including the number of days account receivable number of days conversion cycle with corporate profitability." (2010) In addition findings show that a positive relationship exists between "number of day's accounts payable and profitability." (Dong and Su, 2010 )
Dong and Su specifically stated as follows:
"The negative between corporate profitability that measured by gross operating profitability and cash conversion cycle that used as measuring efficiency of working capital management shows that cash conversion cycle is longer, profitability is smaller. This study suggests that managers can create value for their shareholders by reducing the cash conversion cycle to a reasonable range." ( Dong and Su, 2010)
The study discovers that when analyzing working capital management and profitability on Vietnam stock market also indicates that there is a negative number of accounts receivable days and inventories and findings additionally state that analysis of the link between working capital management and profitability demonstrated that managers increased profitability by "reducing the number of days accounts receivable and inventories and additionally stated in the findings is that "the more profitable firms "wait longer to pay their bills." (Dong and Su, 2010 )Stated as limitations of the study reported by Dong and Sun is that the study is referenced to internal factors only but fails to consider external factors including "industry dummy, level of economic activity…" (Dong and Su, 2010)
V. Trends in Working Capital
Trends in working capital are explored in the work of Padachi (2006) specific to the impact that working capital management has on Firms' Performance. A working capital management process and system provide positive contributions to the firm's created value. (Padachi, 2006, paraphrased) The study of Padachi had as its purpose to analyze the trend in working capital needs and profitability of the firms participating in the study. Reported as the dependent variable is the return on total assets used as a measure of profitability and the relation between working capital management and corporate profitability is investigated for a sample that totaled 50 small manufacturing firms, using panel data analysis for the period 1990." ( Padachi, 2006)
VI. U.S. Department of Energy Working Capital report
The work of the U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund "Guidebook for Creating and Managing Working Capital Funds Business" published in February 2003, examines a 'working capital fund' stating that it is a financial tool for managing common administrative services within a Federal agency." (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003) It is reported that the conversion of an activity "from a conventional administrative framework, with direct funding and centralized management, to a working capital fund "business" will change the ways in which decisions are made, vesting more decision-making in customers organizations. This conversion is intended to promote efficiency through customer incentives to conserve resources, fair and visible "full cost" allocation of resources, and flexibility for supplier organizations to meet customer needs." (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
The U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund" (2003) report states that working capital funds are "consistent with the President's management Agenda and with Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board criteria for managerial cost accounting." (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003) The working capital fund is reported to provide structural support to supplementation rather than replacement of other formal forms with the option to either party to appeal the issues to the Deputy Secretary. No appeals have as of yet been forthcoming. The Fund is comprised of several lines of business with each of these bearing the burden of operating "on a breakeven basis whereby business earnings are sufficient to cover business expenses." (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003) The Fund publishes business type financial terms and statements and managers are under the direction of governmental regulations regarding "financial control, procurement, human resources, and the like." (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
The U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund" states that the financial management features of fund businesses including such as "…formal pricing policies, customer advance payments, monthly billings that create business earnings, quarterly cost accruals,, and business-type treatment of capital acquisition sand inventory transactions." (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
VII. Quarterly Duties of Reporting
Each quarter it is reported that the Fund Manager undergoes a review of each of the business lines reporting to the board the following stated information:
(1) Whether current year earnings will cover business expenses;
(2) Whether customer organizations are paying their bills;
(3) Whether there have been any violations of administrative control of funds procedures;
(4) Whether budget estimates have been accurate;
(5) Whether pricing policy changes are needed; and (6) Whether billing and other financial systems have produced accurate and timely information. (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
VII. Five-Year Plan requirement for the Board
Geared toward assisting business managers in identification of issues and supporting customer organizations plan budgeting the Board requests that each of the business lines prepare a five-year plan through use of the Balanced Scorecard concepts uphold in Harvard Business Review over the past ten years. The Scorecard highlights four specific dimensions of perspective for performance management stated to include the following four dimensions:
(1) Customer Perspective;
(2)Financial Perspective;
(3) Learning and Growth Perspective; and (4) Internal Business Process perspective. (Dong and Su, 2010)
The scorecard was specifically designed for particular private sector organizations however, the scorecard has been used in public organizations as well. The customer perspective is stated to include considerations of "what goods and services does the business produces for customers and what pricing policy options are available to be considered by the Board? " (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
The Financial Perspective is stated to include it necessary to consider the cost structure of the business and how it is that business expenses experience variation in response to customer demand? As well, questioned should be the savings that might be effected and how it is that this type cost structure could be made compatible with the pricing policy earnings structure.( U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
In regards to learning and growth it is stated that necessary considerations include:
(1) What organizational and employee development/training requirements are driven by creation of a new "business"? And (2) What information systems are needed to support periodic billing of customers and measurement of business success? (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
Internal Business Processes include the necessary consideration of:
(1) What process improvements are needed and which have the highest payoff for customers?
(2) What can the business learn about practices in other Federal agencies, especially those with similar business lines being operated on a fee-for-service basis? (U.S. Department of Energy: Working Capital Fund, 2003)
IX. Dell Case Study
You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.