Abraham Lincoln's Presidency: Civil War and Emancipation
This paper examines Abraham Lincoln's presidency through the lens of his military strategy, political decision-making, and landmark legislation. It traces the historical background of sectional conflict over slavery, analyzes Lincoln's rationale for prosecuting the Civil War as a means of preserving national unity, and evaluates the military and political dimensions of the Union's campaign against the Confederacy. The paper gives particular attention to the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, assessing its immediate limitations, its strategic purposes, and its international reception. It concludes by briefly comparing Lincoln's nation-building role to that of Otto von Bismarck in Germany.
- Introduction: Lincoln as a National Symbol: Lincoln's role as symbol of liberty and transformation
- Historical Background: Slavery and Sectional Conflict: Slavery's role in causing the Civil War
- Lincoln's Military Strategy and the Civil War: Union military strategy and Lincoln's wartime decisions
- Political Strategy and Rallying Support for the Union: How Lincoln built political support for the Union cause
- The Emancipation Proclamation: Purpose and Limitations: Proclamation's strategic goals, legal limits, and reception
- Lincoln's Legacy and Comparison to Bismarck: Lincoln compared to Bismarck as a nation-builder
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates direct quotations from primary sources — including Lincoln's speeches and the text of the Emancipation Proclamation — to ground its arguments in historical evidence rather than mere assertion.
- It maintains a consistent analytical thread: Lincoln's decisions are evaluated not as moral imperatives but as calculated strategic choices, which gives the argument nuance and avoids oversimplification.
- The paper acknowledges tensions in its subject, notably that Lincoln was not an ardent abolitionist and that the Proclamation had limited immediate legal effect, demonstrating intellectual honesty.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of contextual framing: each major action Lincoln took — calling for troops, issuing the Proclamation, delivering the Inaugural Address — is explained within the broader political and military context of the time. This prevents events from appearing as isolated decisions and instead shows them as responses to compounding pressures, a technique central to historical analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief biographical and thematic introduction, then establishes historical context around slavery and sectionalism. It moves through Lincoln's military and political strategy during the Civil War before devoting substantial space to the Emancipation Proclamation — its text, goals, limitations, and reception. A brief comparative conclusion connects Lincoln to Bismarck as nation-builders. The bibliography is formatted in Chicago style with both a reference list and footnote-style endnotes.
Introduction: Lincoln as a National Symbol
Abraham Lincoln is considered to be one of the most important American presidents in the nation's history. He has been portrayed as a symbol of liberty, national unity, and political transformation. His contributions in all these areas were vital to the overall development of the country and its emergence on the international stage.
Lincoln was well-known even before the Civil War as an important political figure, particularly in debates over slavery and national unity within the Confederation. However, his qualities as a strategist, political leader, and symbol of the nation were revealed during the Civil War and through the acts by which he gave the Constitution the true power of its provisions. One of his most important actions was the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, which declared all slaves in rebellious states to be free.
The personality of Abraham Lincoln must be analyzed through the actions he undertook throughout his presidency, including the Civil War and its aftermath. His career must be examined from a military point of view, from the perspective of the national strategy he conducted during the Civil War, and through the Emancipation Proclamation initiative — its effects, reasons, and outcomes.
Historical Background: Slavery and Sectional Conflict
The historical background of Lincoln's presidency was greatly shaped by the issue of slavery and the controversy surrounding it. The Constitution provided that all men are created equal and that every human being should enjoy certain inalienable rights conferred by the nature of humanity itself. However, the "peculiar institution" placed this principle in question and denied African Americans the right to be free and to determine their own futures. From this point of view, debates over slavery affected both the history of the states at the time and the structure of society — especially the relationship between the white and black populations.
The Civil War had numerous causes, most of which were rooted in the increasing tensions between the northern and southern states. These tensions revolved around the question of whether slavery was a useful and necessary institution. The issue also gave rise to questions about national unity, since each state claimed the right to decide for itself on the matter of slavery. While northern states questioned the morality and necessity of enslaved labor, the South considered it the cornerstone of their economic prosperity. At this point, the split had been created. After the end of the war, Lincoln underlined the true reason for fighting in the first place: "we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth" (The White House, n.d.).
Abraham Lincoln saw the Civil War as a necessary evil destined to restore the unity of the American nation. He also understood it as a war fought for equality among men. During the Gettysburg Address, he declared: "Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure." Therefore, the main reason for the Civil War, according to Lincoln, was to keep the country united. The same idea was expressed in the "House Divided" speech during the Lincoln-Douglas debates, in which he argued that the issue of slavery would ultimately lead to the destruction of national unity.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.