This paper examines Abraham Lincoln's presidency through the lens of his military strategy, political decision-making, and landmark legislation. It traces the historical background of sectional conflict over slavery, analyzes Lincoln's rationale for prosecuting the Civil War as a means of preserving national unity, and evaluates the military and political dimensions of the Union's campaign against the Confederacy. The paper gives particular attention to the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, assessing its immediate limitations, its strategic purposes, and its international reception. It concludes by briefly comparing Lincoln's nation-building role to that of Otto von Bismarck in Germany.
The paper demonstrates effective use of contextual framing: each major action Lincoln took — calling for troops, issuing the Proclamation, delivering the Inaugural Address — is explained within the broader political and military context of the time. This prevents events from appearing as isolated decisions and instead shows them as responses to compounding pressures, a technique central to historical analysis.
The paper opens with a brief biographical and thematic introduction, then establishes historical context around slavery and sectionalism. It moves through Lincoln's military and political strategy during the Civil War before devoting substantial space to the Emancipation Proclamation — its text, goals, limitations, and reception. A brief comparative conclusion connects Lincoln to Bismarck as nation-builders. The bibliography is formatted in Chicago style with both a reference list and footnote-style endnotes.
Abraham Lincoln is considered to be one of the most important American presidents in the nation's history. He has been portrayed as a symbol of liberty, national unity, and political transformation. His contributions in all these areas were vital to the overall development of the country and its emergence on the international stage.
Lincoln was well-known even before the Civil War as an important political figure, particularly in debates over slavery and national unity within the Confederation. However, his qualities as a strategist, political leader, and symbol of the nation were revealed during the Civil War and through the acts by which he gave the Constitution the true power of its provisions. One of his most important actions was the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, which declared all slaves in rebellious states to be free.
The personality of Abraham Lincoln must be analyzed through the actions he undertook throughout his presidency, including the Civil War and its aftermath. His career must be examined from a military point of view, from the perspective of the national strategy he conducted during the Civil War, and through the Emancipation Proclamation initiative — its effects, reasons, and outcomes.
The historical background of Lincoln's presidency was greatly shaped by the issue of slavery and the controversy surrounding it. The Constitution provided that all men are created equal and that every human being should enjoy certain inalienable rights conferred by the nature of humanity itself. However, the "peculiar institution" placed this principle in question and denied African Americans the right to be free and to determine their own futures. From this point of view, debates over slavery affected both the history of the states at the time and the structure of society — especially the relationship between the white and black populations.
The Civil War had numerous causes, most of which were rooted in the increasing tensions between the northern and southern states. These tensions revolved around the question of whether slavery was a useful and necessary institution. The issue also gave rise to questions about national unity, since each state claimed the right to decide for itself on the matter of slavery. While northern states questioned the morality and necessity of enslaved labor, the South considered it the cornerstone of their economic prosperity. At this point, the split had been created. After the end of the war, Lincoln underlined the true reason for fighting in the first place: "we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth" (The White House, n.d.).
Abraham Lincoln saw the Civil War as a necessary evil destined to restore the unity of the American nation. He also understood it as a war fought for equality among men. During the Gettysburg Address, he declared: "Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure." Therefore, the main reason for the Civil War, according to Lincoln, was to keep the country united. The same idea was expressed in the "House Divided" speech during the Lincoln-Douglas debates, in which he argued that the issue of slavery would ultimately lead to the destruction of national unity.
Lincoln's military and strategic qualities enabled him to achieve a relative sense of unity among the population that survived the Civil War. In order to assess his achievements, however, it is important to consider his specific actions during this period.
Although Lincoln had considerable political visibility, he had not managed to reach the front stage of Republican political life before becoming president in 1861. The times were turbulent: at the time of his arrival in Washington, "the Confederate States of America had been formed. In his first inaugural address, Lincoln tried to woo the South back into the Union, but after the bombardment of Fort Sumter, April 12, he called for 75,000 volunteers to suppress 'the insurrection,' declared a blockade of Southern ports, and authorized the suspension of Habeas Corpus in areas threatened by pro-secessionist elements." This stance represented an important step in his approach to the Civil War, signaling his approval of the use of force in order to restore order and unity. Many politicians of the time considered him a tyrant precisely because he intervened in the exercise of their Constitutional rights. However, Lincoln believed that the desire for unity must take precedence over socially conferred rights.
His conviction was grounded in a well-developed sense of rationality. He pointed out the role that reason must play in guiding political leaders' priorities: "Lincoln warned that the pillars of the republic must fall 'unless we, their descendants, supply their places with other pillars, hewn from the solid quarry of sober reason. Passion has helped us; but can do so no more. It will in future be our enemy. Reason, cold, calculating, unimpassioned reason, must furnish all the materials for our future support and defense.'" From this perspective, Lincoln's decision to pursue war between the northern and southern states was calculated and rational, weighing benefits and advantages against disadvantages and, most importantly, against the risk of the total dissolution of national unity.
The choice to use military force was also justified by the resources at Lincoln's disposal. In terms of manpower, the North held a significant advantage over the South. Furthermore, since the worst alternative to war was the dissolution of the state, the president assumed responsibility and concluded that the best response to the resupply attempt at Charleston was to call for troops to put down the rebellion. Lincoln's decision to retaliate and command his forces against the Confederacy marked the first spark of the war.
Despite the North's numerical advantage, the South occupied a stronger strategic position, which made Lincoln's task increasingly difficult. Some historians have interpreted the war's outcome in terms of Confederate military failure rather than Union success. As one analysis notes, "Historians have often attributed the failure of the Southern Confederacy to win its independence to its inferiority in available manpower and to other equally tangible factors such as inadequate industrial support, weak internal transportation, and a dearth of naval facilities. Indeed, for more than a generation after the end of the war, Union numerical and material superiority seemed, to Southern observers at least, to constitute a full explanation for Confederate defeat." However, the Union's actual military task was to conquer more than 750,000 square miles of enemy territory — far more than a merely defensive campaign — requiring an active military approach and substantial resources.
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.