Research Paper Undergraduate 3,437 words

Air India Organizational Structure: Functions and Design

~18 min read 5 sections Business · Organizational Design

Abstract

This paper examines the interrelationships between organizational functions and organizational structure, using Air India as a central case study. It explores the advantages and disadvantages of functional, divisional, and matrix structural forms before analyzing how Air India's functional organizational design connects to its business objectives, including market share, employee satisfaction, and profitability. The paper further considers the airline's size and historical development, its commercial and industrial scope, and the complexities arising from its government-owned, mechanistic structure. Cultural factors and centralized decision-making are identified as key challenges affecting the airline's international operations and internal coordination.

Key Takeaways

Organizational Functions and Structural Types: Compares functional, divisional, and matrix structural models
Air India's Organizational Structure and Functions: Air India's departments, hierarchy, and business objectives
Structure, Size, and Scope of Air India: Airline's history, size, and commercial scope
Complexities of Air India's Business Structure: Mechanistic structure, cultural challenges, and centralized control
Conclusion: Summary of structure-function interrelationships at Air India

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

Systematically compares three structural types (functional, divisional, matrix) with balanced advantages and disadvantages before applying the framework to a real organization.
Grounds abstract theory in a concrete case study, tracing Air India's historical development, ownership structure, and departmental design to show how theory manifests in practice.
Connects organizational structure explicitly to business objectives (market share, employee satisfaction, growth), making the analysis applied rather than purely descriptive.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates theory-to-practice application: it introduces organizational concepts drawn from multiple scholarly sources (Hatch, Stokes, Burns and Stalker), classifies Air India against those frameworks (mechanistic vs. organic), and then uses the classification to explain real operational outcomes, including cultural clashes in international hubs. This layered approach—define, classify, apply, evaluate—is a reliable structure for business and management essays.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a conceptual overview of structural types and their trade-offs, then transitions to Air India's specific structural setup and departmental functions. A middle section addresses size and scope through historical and commercial lenses. The final section addresses structural complexity and its cultural and managerial consequences, drawing the theoretical threads back to real-world implications for the airline.

📘 Read the full research paper guide → Generate citations → Build an outline → Draft a literature review → 📚 More Organizational Design examples →

Essay 3,437 words

Organizational Functions and Structural Types

The functions of an organization encompass the different activities undertaken by a business, including production or manufacturing, marketing, sales, accounting, and research and development. According to Sherman and Thompson (2019), the organizational structure delineates the relationships and interrelations between the functions of a business and determines how the chain of command operates across various levels. The interrelationship between organizational functions and organizational structure is akin to a flow chart: an entity can build its business structure around its organizational functions, and even if it does not, the two will still exert influence on each other (Sherman and Thompson, 2019).

Functional Organizational Structure

A functional organizational structure creates distinct, separate departments. Many businesses adopt a functional organizational structure that includes a clear chain of command. Various functions are placed into distinct departments or divisions that report to department heads, who subsequently report to individuals positioned higher in the hierarchy (Aquinas, 2008). One key advantage of a functional structure is well-defined lines of authority, with fundamental decision-makers in every department responsible for setting the general mission and tasks. This structure also permits every employee to focus on his or her specific role. However, it has shortcomings: it can give rise to departments that fail to communicate or collaborate effectively. As a result, a customer may be moved from one department to another when an issue does not clearly belong to a single function (Vitez and Baligh, 2011).

Divisional Organizational Structure

The interrelationship between functions means that a divisional structure has numerous branches. A divisional organizational structure extends functions across various branches: if an organization has distinct lines of production, each line has its own functional groups, such as accounting, research and development, and marketing (Jones, 2013). The advantage is that every division has the staff needed to undertake all essential functions and can operate relatively independently. The disadvantage is that having personnel in every division performing similar functions can result in significant redundancy or inefficiency. For instance, managing six separate human resources or accounting operations, rather than a single centralized operation, results in duplication of functions, management systems, policy development, and more (Daft, 2015).

Matrix Organizational Structure

The matrix organizational structure facilitates flexibility. An organization using a matrix structure can achieve greater flexibility in business functions compared to a more strictly hierarchical entity (Cunliffe, 2008). Within a matrix structure, each employee operates within a function-oriented department — such as finance or sales and marketing — but can be assigned to projects under various supervisors and placed into teams with employees who have different functions. An additional advantage is that the structure adapts organizational functions to the changing needs of the organization. The shortcoming, however, is that lines of authority within the matrix can become unclear and contested (Cunliffe and Luhman, 2012).

4 Sections Hidden · 1,750 words

Air India's Organizational Structure and Functions520 words

As a statutory company, Air India submits an annual report of its activities to the Indian Parliament through the Ministry of Civil Aviation. The company maintains functional independence. Air India's headquarters in Mumbai comprises…

Structure, Size, and Scope of Air India620 words

Organizational structure is defined as the totality of the methods by which an organization divides its labor into distinct tasks and subtasks and then coordinates them (Koontz, 2010). Organizational design is the process of evaluating the strategic objectives and…

Complexities of Air India's Business Structure530 words

In today's business environment, how an enterprise designs and structures its tasks, activities, and departments — and coordinates them among different individuals — is pivotal to survival and success. When an entity commences operations, its organizational design is usually simple.…

Conclusion80 words

Air India's mechanistic and centralized organizational structure reflects the complexities inherent in a large, government-owned airline operating across domestic and international markets. The functional structure adopted by the airline links directly to its…

View Full Document

References

Air India. (2019). Board of Directors. Retrieved from

Aquinas, P. G. (2008). Organization structure and design. Excel Books India.

Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (2005). Mechanistic and organic systems. Organizational Behavior, 2, 214–225.

Choo, S., & Bowley, C. (2007). Using training and development to affect job satisfaction. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(2), 339–352.

Cichocki, P., & Irwin, C. (2014). Organization design: A guide to building effective organizations. Kogan Page Publishers.

Civil Aviation. (2019). About Us: Organizational Setup. Retrieved from

Cunliffe, A. L. (2008). Organization theory. Sage.

Cunliffe, A. L., & Luhman, J. T. (2012). Key concepts in organization theory. Sage.

Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization theory and design. Cengage Learning.

Fried, Y., Shirom, A., Gilboa, S., & Cooper, C. L. (2008). The mediating effects of job satisfaction and propensity to leave on role stress–job performance relationships: Combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(4), 305–328.

Grant, R. M. (2016). Contemporary strategy analysis: Text and cases edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Guerra, T. (2017). Airline organization structure. Biz Fluent. Retrieved from https://bizfluent.com/about-7219171-airline-organization-structure.html

Harris, O. J., & Hartman, S. J. (2002). Organizational behaviors. Sage.

Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organizational social structure. In Organization theory (pp. 161–199). Oxford University Press.

Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational theory, design, and change. Pearson.

Karanam, S. (2012). Case study: Air India. Scribd. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/104015916/Case-Study-Air-India

Kaul, V. K. (2015). Principles and practices of management. Vikas Publishing House.

Koontz, H. (2010). Essentials of management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

Mukaila, A. (2015). Nature, scope and purpose of business. ResearchGate.

Polzer, J. T. (2003). Leading teams. Harvard Business School.

Pride, W. M., Hughes, R. J., & Kapoor, J. R. (2014). Foundations of business. Cengage Learning.

Rani, P. (2013). Organizational structure of Air India. Scribd. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/123514531/Organizational-Structure-of-Air-India

Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: Structure, design and applications (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Sharma, M. K., & Singh, M. K. (2015). Impact of changing socio-economic environment on business in India. International Journal, 21.

Sherman, F., & Thompson, J. (2019). What is the relationship between organizational functions and organizational structure? Chron. Retrieved from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/relationship-between-organizational-functions-organizational-structure-18571.html

Shellar, M. (2018). Air India Limited: Project report. International Journal of Engineering Research and Management, 5(6), 2349–2058.

Stokes, A. (2005). A study in the relationships between organizational structures and public relations practitioner roles. Scholar Commons.

Vitez, O., & Baligh, H. H. (2011). Organization structures: Theory and design, analysis and prescription. Springer.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Functional Structure Divisional Structure Matrix Structure Air India Organizational Design Mechanistic Organization Centralized Control Business Objectives Structural Complexity Airline Industry