This paper examines the role of assessment in employee development, arguing that tools such as the Myers-Briggs assessment instrument help managers identify strengths, weaknesses, and leadership potential in their workforce. The paper further contends that assessment alone is insufficient and must be combined with formal education, job experiences, and interpersonal relationships such as mentoring and coaching. It explores why managers sometimes avoid coaching, reviews the advantages of corporate universities, and evaluates training methods effective for executive development, including custom university courses and distance learning. Drawing primarily on Noe's foundational texts on employee training and development, the paper provides a concise overview of best practices in organizational workforce development.
Assessment is central to employee development because it involves collecting information and providing feedback to employees about their behavior, communication style, and skills. Negative feedback on any of these dimensions can compel employees to change for the better, while positive feedback motivates them to strengthen these attributes further. Assessment is also important because it helps management identify employees with managerial capabilities (Noe, 2005).
Assessment helps measure current managers' strengths and weaknesses and can identify individuals with the potential to move into higher-level executive positions. When those conducting the assessment work alongside teams, it becomes easier to identify team members' strengths, weaknesses, and the factors that negatively affect their productivity. Tools such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, when used effectively, allow management to evaluate employees' communication skills, motivation, teamwork, work styles, and leadership abilities. Beyond these, skills such as problem solving, interpersonal competence, administrative ability, and personal effectiveness can also be assessed using such instruments.
Assessment can further help management recognize skills related to managerial success that an employee may already possess (Noe, 2005). These include resourcefulness, the ability to set a development climate, straightforwardness and composure, compassion and sensitivity, building and mending relationships, doing whatever it takes, acting with flexibility, putting people at ease, hiring talented staff, self-awareness, decisiveness, and maintaining a healthy balance between personal life and work.
Assessment alone is not sufficient for effective employee development. It must be integrated with formal education, interpersonal relationships, and job experiences, none of which can be overlooked. Job experience, for example, is a particularly important element because it enables employees to handle unfamiliar responsibilities, develop new competencies, and work through complex challenges (Noe, 2005). It places employees in high-stakes situations that require them to absorb external pressures and engage in non-authority relationships where they must influence others without formal power.
Job experiences also prepare employees to face a range of obstacles, including adverse business conditions and limited top-management support, as well as challenges posed by a difficult supervisor. Such experiences arise through promotions, lateral transfers, temporary assignments with other organizations, downward moves, or job rotation programs. Among interpersonal development methods, mentoring and coaching are the most widely used approaches for fostering employee growth (Noe, 2006).
Through coaching, employees build communication skills that help them interact effectively with peers and superiors alike. Coaching by peers or managers can help an employee develop a specific skill, change an unproductive pattern of behavior, adapt to a new process or practice, and improve working relationships. When employees are coached toward higher performance, organizational effectiveness is enhanced as a result (Noe, 2005).
Effective coaches motivate employees, support their skill development, and provide reinforcement and constructive feedback. Despite these benefits, some managers remain reluctant to coach their employees. One reason is that employees may not be fully open with their managers — some find it difficult to answer honestly questions about their career aspirations or job satisfaction. Additionally, some managers worry that close interaction will erode the professional respect employees have for them. Understanding these dynamics is essential for organizations seeking to build a genuine coaching culture at all levels of management.
Workplaces have evolved into environments where people both learn and work simultaneously. Some companies have gone further by establishing their own universities. This approach offers significant advantages, as such institutions can provide ongoing, work-related training to employees at all levels. They offer resources and information that are directly relevant to the organization's needs and can deliver continuous learning opportunities to enrolled employees (Dutkowsky, 2012). At the same time, the costs of establishing and maintaining a corporate university can be considerable, and the breadth of programming may be narrower than what traditional academic institutions offer.
Companies can partner with universities and other learning institutions to address the education needs of their executives. Universities can design short, customized courses tailored specifically to executive responsibilities and organizational priorities. Companies may also support executives in pursuing distance learning opportunities offered by universities, and executives can supplement formal coursework with training and development activities led by consultants or faculty members.
These training methods enable executives to strengthen their strategic thinking capabilities and leadership abilities, sharpen their capacity to compete in a global marketplace, and improve the customer experience. In addition, such approaches support the development of functional expertise and business excellence (Noe, 2005).
"Benefits and drawbacks of employer-run universities"
"University partnerships and distance learning develop executives"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.