Augustine on Free Will, Original Sin, and Loving God
This paper examines Augustine's philosophical and theological framework for understanding good, evil, and human nature, drawing primarily on his Confessions. Tracing Augustine's debt to Platonic thought, the paper analyzes his claim that loving and serving God is humanity's fundamental moral responsibility. It then interrogates the tensions within that claim, particularly how original sin, human weakness, and divine grace complicate the idea that devotion to God reliably leads people away from evil. The paper concludes that while Augustine acknowledges humanity's persistent tendency toward wrongdoing, Holy Scripture and the grace of God remain, in his view, the essential instruments of moral redemption.
- Augustine's Platonic Foundation and the Role of the Will: Platonic roots of Augustine's moral theology and will
- Crimes, Vices, and the Limits of Human Devotion: Human weakness and exceptions challenge Augustine's moral claim
- Original Sin, Grace, and the Problem of Salvation: Original sin and selective grace complicate loving God
- Holy Scripture as a Moral Compass: Scripture guides humanity back toward God and good
- Conclusion: Redemption remains available through God's grace
✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It identifies a genuine internal tension in Augustine's thought — that loving God should prevent sin, yet original sin and selective grace undercut that promise — and pursues that tension across both sections.
- The paper uses a direct quotation from the Confessions to ground its claims in the primary source, lending textual authority to abstract arguments about lust, darkness, and redemption.
- Counterarguments are raised and then answered, giving the essay a dialectical quality that moves beyond simple summary toward critical engagement.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates internal critique: rather than attacking Augustine from an outside framework, it uses Augustine's own stated principles to expose contradictions within his theology. This technique — finding where an author's conclusions conflict with their own premises — is a hallmark of philosophical analysis at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introductory overview of Augustine's Platonic inheritance and his core moral claim. Part I then challenges that claim through the problems of human frailty, legal exceptions, and selective grace. Part II recovers Augustine's position by foregrounding Holy Scripture and the personal testimony of the Confessions. A brief conclusion synthesizes both movements, affirming redemption as always possible for those who seek it.
Augustine's Platonic Foundation and the Role of the Will
Augustine derived from Plato the perspective that the human self exists as a thinking, immaterial soul. Plato believed firmly that after death, the souls with the greatest love for the Forms would rise and contemplate eternal truths — a kind of heaven existing beyond time and space. Augustine interpreted such Forms as concepts within the mind of a perfect and eternal God. Augustine held that the main requirement for human beings was to love that eternal, perfect God. He therefore emphasized the significance of the will and the ability to choose between good and evil. Loving and serving God was, to Augustine, a fundamental religious responsibility. By fulfilling this duty, a person could succeed in avoiding evil and choosing good.
References
Augustine, & Pine-Coffin, R. (1961). Confessions. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.