Essay Topic Hub

Free Will
Essays

20+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

20 papers
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
What is Free Will?

Free will ranks among the most enduring questions in philosophy, theology, and the humanities, asking whether human beings genuinely author their own choices or whether those choices are shaped by forces beyond their control. Students encounter the topic across courses in ethics, political philosophy, religious studies, and literature, precisely because it sits at the intersection of personal responsibility, moral judgment, and metaphysical inquiry. Thinkers such as Augustine, Aquinas, and Sartre appear repeatedly in academic treatments of the subject, each offering a distinct framework — theological, scholastic, or existentialist — that gives instructors a natural way to structure debate and comparison.

The papers archived here approach free will from several directions. Philosophical essays tend to set up the tension between determinism and free will directly, weighing whether causal necessity leaves room for genuine agency. Others take a theological route, examining how divine foreknowledge in thinkers like Augustine and Aquinas bears on human freedom. Political and economic angles also appear, with at least one paper contrasting free will as understood through Marxism and free market capitalism. Literary analysis is well represented too, with works such as Goblin Market and Oedipus the King serving as case studies in fate, agency, and consequence.

A strong essay on free will needs a clearly bounded thesis — arguing for a specific position on compatibility, for instance, rather than surveying every school of thought at once. Evidence drawn from primary philosophical or literary texts carries the most weight, since paraphrase without close reading rarely satisfies instructors. The most common pitfall is conflating free will with unpredictability; a careful essay distinguishes between acting without coercion and acting without cause, keeping those concepts analytically separate throughout.

20 papers
Sort by:
Research Paper Undergraduate
Human agency and alienation in Marxist theory and capitalism
The philosophical arguments about 'free will' and 'human agency' both focus on the capacity of human beings to act on their own. The concept of "Free Will" presupposes the rationality of human beings and boils down to…
Paper Undergraduate
Free will and fate in Christina Rossetti's Goblin Market
FREE WILL VS. FATE IN THE "GOBLIN MARKET"
Research Paper Undergraduate
The philosophical debate between free will and determinism
Free-will and determinism are issues of faith. Some people believe that each individual has unrestricted free-will to act as he or she chooses no matter the obligations or consequences of the act.
Research Paper Undergraduate
Free Will, Divine Foreknowledge, and Determinism
The issue of free will and divine foreknowledge creates a somewhat problematic paradox for Christians. At the basis of the dilemma is the question that, if God knows beforehand the outcomes of everything on earth, can…
Paper Doctorate
Free Will vs. Fate in Sophocles' Oedipus the King
In Oedipus the King by Sophocles, the main characters Laios and Oedipus do all that they can to avoid a prophecy that was told to them by an Oracle. King Laios was told that his own son would end up murdering him, and…
Research Paper Doctorate
Free Will vs. Determinism: Augustine, Freud, Marx, and Sartre
To define his evolving notions of Original Sin in Christian theology, Augustine solidified in the doctrine Christianity a notion of the radical freedom of the human will -- what made human beings wonderfully distinct…
Paper Doctorate
Does Free Will Exist? Six Major Philosophical Views
Does "Free Will" Exist and if so, to What Extent does it Exist? The concept of "Free Will" has been debated by many philosophers over a period of centuries, not only regarding its very existence but also regarding its elements, the extent to which it may or may not exist and its moral implications. Our assigned readings have merely touched on debates that have raged and will probably continue to rage as long as human beings contemplate the "truths" about being. Though an exhaustive review of differing philosophical treatments of "Free Will" would probably take hundreds of pages, this work will briefly examine several major philosophies of "Free Will" and some of their most notable proponents. In reviewing these sources and differing approaches to "Free Will," we can see that philosophers approach the concept of "Free Will" with differing definitions, examining disparate aspects and resulting in somewhat different implications for Morality. It is fortunate that this work does not require a definitive conclusion about the existence and impact of "Free Will," for review of sources from class reading and independent reading reveals that the only definitive conclusion can be that there is no definitive conclusion. It appears that each philosopher in his turn treats Free Will and aspects of Free Will somewhat differently and arrives at unique conclusions. Descartes takes the most extreme position examined, apparently believing that there is Free Will and that it is completely unrestrained and undiminished by divine grace or natural knowledge. Immanuel Kant believed that there is Free Will but it is based solely in the rational aspect of the human being and is known essentially because we rationally know that we have certain incontrovertible duties. Roderick Chisholm believes that there is Free Will but that it is specifically linked to a type of "agent causation" as opposed to transeunt or "event" causation. Peter Van Inwagen believes that there is Free Will but only in a very small set of circumstances illustrated by "a garden of forking paths," some of which are illusions. Daniel M. Wegner believes that there is Free Will but that much of our supposed Free Will or Conscious Will is actually a simplistic illusion created for our benefits by our minds. Finally, Benjamin Libet believes there is Free Will but simultaneously refutes much of the traditional notion of Free Will through experiments indicating that many of our actions precede our will and that our exercise of Free Will primarily resides in controlling commenced actions by "vetoing" them. In sum, without even addressing the work of philosophers who do not believe in the existence of Free Will at all, we see disparate approaches to Free Will, to its nature, to its extent and to its moral implications. Indeed, some of these philosophers themselves decry the "incoherence" of philosophical treatments of "Free Will" while attempting to contribute their own thoughts on a vital philosophical topic that shows no signs of uniform conclusions.
Paper High School
Free Will and Determinism in Psychology
Define free will and determinism. Identify how free will and determinism are relevant to the concepts in social psychology. Discuss two specific social psychology concepts that demonstrate free will and/or determinism.
Paper Doctorate
Free Will Nietzsche Could Believe In: A Philosophical Analysis
Are we free to do what we want with our lives? There are a number of ways in which we are clearly not. I am not free to live in 13th century France; I am not free to square circles, to bi-locate, to respire carbon…
Paper Undergraduate
Free will, fate, and superstition in Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery"
For millennia people have believed that we cannot chose our own future and that things that happen as time passes are entirely up to our fate. However, there were also people that considered fate to be a myth, with the…