Essay Undergraduate 1,259 words

Character Analysis of Bartleby in Melville's Short Story

~7 min read
Abstract

This paper examines the character of Bartleby in Herman Melville's short story "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street," exploring how Melville constructs a complex protagonist through comparative characterization, class dynamics, and symbolic depth. The analysis traces Bartleby's introduction, his relationship with the narrator-employer, and his famous refrain "I would prefer not to," arguing that these elements reveal broader themes of social inequality and the futility of human existence. The paper also considers how the supporting characters — Turkey, Nippers, and Ginger Nut — serve as foils that sharpen the reader's understanding of Bartleby's unique and enigmatic nature.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Context and significance of Melville's story
  • Introducing Bartleby Through Comparative Characterization: Narrator frames Bartleby as elusive central subject
  • The Narrator's Other Employees as Foils: Turkey and Nippers contrast with Bartleby's qualities
  • Social Class and the Employer–Employee Relationship: Class difference shapes narrator's treatment of Bartleby
  • Bartleby's Symbolic Significance: Bartleby represents humanity and existential futility
  • Conclusion: Bartleby as symbol central to the story's meaning
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper uses direct textual quotations from Melville's story to ground each analytical claim, providing concrete evidence for characterization arguments.
  • It employs comparative analysis effectively, showing how the supporting characters Turkey and Nippers function as foils that highlight Bartleby's distinctive qualities.
  • The essay moves from textual detail to broader thematic significance, connecting Bartleby's individual behavior to class dynamics and universal human themes.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates close reading as an analytical method. Rather than summarizing plot, it selects specific passages and unpacks their significance — for example, analyzing the narrator's opening description of Bartleby to show how characterization is constructed through contrast and selective disclosure. This technique models how literary analysis moves from textual evidence to interpretive argument.

Structure breakdown

The essay opens with a brief contextual introduction to the story and its reception, then develops its argument across four analytical sections: the narrator's framing of Bartleby, the comparative characterization of the other employees, the class relationship between Bartleby and his employer, and the symbolic resonance of Bartleby's character. A short conclusion ties these threads together. The structure is linear and thesis-driven, suitable for an undergraduate literary analysis essay.

Introduction

Herman Melville's "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street" is now considered one of the most important short stories in American literature. Although it did not receive the best reviews when it was first published in the 1850s, the complexity of its writing and the richness of its themes have since established it as one of the most interesting and revealing literary works of its era. The main character, Bartleby, is the central focus of the story and the element that lends the piece much of its complexity.

Introducing Bartleby Through Comparative Characterization

One of the most interesting aspects of the short story is the character of Bartleby, whom the narrator introduces from the very beginning as the subject of his account. The narrator explains: "I waive the biographies of all other scriveners for a few passages in the life of Bartleby, who was a scrivener the strangest I ever saw or heard of. While of other law-copyists I might write the complete life, of Bartleby nothing of that sort can be done. I believe that no materials exist for a full and satisfactory biography of this man. It is an irreparable loss to literature. Bartleby was one of those beings of whom nothing is ascertainable, except from the original sources, and in his case those are very small. What my own astonished eyes saw of Bartleby, that is all I know of him, except, indeed, one vague report, which will appear in the sequel" (Melville). The narrator thus places Bartleby at the center of the story, and the entire narration follows in the form of a characterization of him. By tracing Bartleby's actions from his first day of work through to his eventual death, Melville achieves a complex and layered portrait of the role Bartleby plays.

The chief character is anticipated from the very opening, even if he is not fully introduced at first. The narrator's decision to provide background on his own business and his three other employees effectively sets the stage for Bartleby's entrance. The narrator builds up details about the other characters — including assumptions about their working habits — in order to subsequently reveal Bartleby's own qualities and shortcomings by comparison.

The Narrator's Other Employees as Foils

The narrator describes the first employee, Turkey, as follows: "Turkey was a short, pursy Englishman of about my own age, that is, somewhere not far from sixty. In the morning, one might say, his face was of a fine florid hue, but after twelve o'clock, meridian — his dinner hour — it blazed like a grate full of Christmas coals; and continued blazing — but, as it were, with a gradual wane — till 6 o'clock, P.M., or thereabouts, after which I saw no more of the proprietor of the face, which, gaining its meridian with the sun, seemed to set with it, to rise, culminate, and decline the following day, with the like regularity and undiminished glory" (Melville). The narrator goes on to note Turkey's personal failings and unsatisfying work habits.

The second employee is described thus: "Nippers, the second on my list, was a whiskered, sallow, and, upon the whole, rather piratical-looking young man of about five and twenty. I always deemed him the victim of two evil powers — ambition and indigestion. The ambition was evinced by a certain impatience of the duties of a mere copyist, an unwarrantable usurpation of strictly professional affairs, such as the original drawing up of legal documents. The indigestion seemed betokened in an occasional nervous testiness and grinning irritability, causing the teeth to audibly grind together over mistakes committed in copying; unnecessary maledictions, hissed, rather than spoken, in the heat of business; and especially by a continual discontent with the height of the table where he worked" (Melville). Both Turkey and Nippers, then, fail to earn positive assessments from their employer, yet manage to remain employed. The gap between the work they were hired to perform and their actual output makes Bartleby's own productivity — up to a point — all the more striking by contrast. In this way, one of the earliest characterizations of the main character is achieved through the comparative portrayal of these two supporting figures.

As per the narrator's first direct description of Bartleby: "a motionless young man one morning stood upon my office threshold, the door being open, for it was summer. I can see that figure now — pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn! It was Bartleby" (Melville). The narrator adds that he engaged him, "glad to have among my corps of copyists a man of so singularly sedate an aspect, which I thought might operate beneficially upon the flighty temper of Turkey, and the fiery one of Nippers" — a remark that underscores precisely why the initial characterization of the other employees was necessary.

2 locked sections · 305 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Social Class and the Employer–Employee Relationship175 words
An important dimension of Bartleby's character is the relationship between him and the narrator. Given that the narrator is also his employer, there is a…
Bartleby's Symbolic Significance130 words
Bartleby's predicament is not reducible to his financial or social circumstances alone; it reaches toward something more profound. The narrator's final exclamation after Bartleby's death — "Ah Bartleby! Ah…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools

Conclusion

Overall, the short story's central character is representative both of Melville's craft and of the symbolic dimensions his fiction can achieve. Bartleby's enigmatic personality, his passive defiance, and his ultimate fate combine to make him far more than a curious legal copyist — he stands as a figure of profound human significance whose resonance has only grown since the story's first publication.

Reference

Melville, Herman. "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-Street." 2013. Available online at

Key Concepts in This Paper
Bartleby Passive Resistance Social Class Comparative Characterization Narrator Reliability American Literature Symbolic Protagonist Wall Street Setting Employer-Employee Dynamics Human Futility
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Character Analysis of Bartleby in Melville's Short Story. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/bartleby-scrivener-character-analysis-melville-86052

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.