Bedside Manner in Advanced Practice Nursing: Concept Analysis
This paper presents a concept analysis of bedside manner within the context of advanced practice nursing (APN), with particular focus on patient perceptions of shift-to-shift bedside handover. Drawing on a review of nursing, medical, social science, and public health literature spanning the past decade, the analysis applies Walker and Avant's (2010) concept analysis method to identify defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of bedside manner. The paper finds that compassion, care, and support are the primary positive attributes of effective bedside manner, while disrespect, arrogance, and indifference represent negative behaviors. Model cases, borderline cases, and related cases are used to illustrate these concepts in clinical practice. The paper concludes that bedside manner significantly affects patient health outcomes, treatment compliance, and overall satisfaction, and that further research is needed to strengthen the nurse–patient partnership.
- Introduction and Aim: Patient-centered care, bedside manner, and study aim
- Review of Literature: Nursing handover, nurse-patient partnership, and empowerment
- Definition and Defining Attributes: Origins and defining attributes of bedside manner
- Content Analysis Method and Antecedents: Walker and Avant method, antecedents, and consequences
- Model, Borderline, and Related Cases: Clinical case illustrations of bedside manner
- Empirical Referents and Conclusion: Compassion literature and call for APN research
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies Walker and Avant's structured concept analysis framework systematically, giving the paper a clear and replicable methodological foundation.
- Uses diverse case types — model, borderline, and related — to ground abstract concepts in recognizable clinical and cultural examples, making the analysis vivid and accessible.
- Integrates both qualitative and quantitative literature sources across nursing, medicine, and social science, demonstrating interdisciplinary breadth appropriate for APN scholarship.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates concept analysis as a scholarly method: it moves from definition and defining attributes through antecedents and consequences to empirical referents, illustrating how an abstract term like "bedside manner" can be rigorously unpacked and operationalized for nursing practice. This technique is central to nursing theory development and is modeled clearly here for readers learning the approach.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a formal abstract and statement of aim, then builds through a literature review before applying Walker and Avant's concept analysis framework in sequential sections: definition, defining attributes, content analysis method, antecedents and consequences, case illustrations (model, borderline, related), and empirical referents. It closes with a conclusion calling for further APN-specific research. Each section corresponds directly to a recognized step in concept analysis methodology.
Introduction and Aim
One feature of patient-centered care — in which patients are treated as partners — is the handover process conducted with patient participation. It is very important for nurses to understand the thinking and perspectives of their patients, as this understanding can help them adjust their bedside manner to suit patient expectations and needs. This involvement can also enable patients to become more engaged in the decision-making process. There is very little detailed evaluation of bedside manner in the literature, particularly from the perspective of nursing practice. Certain provider behaviors have consistently been identified as either positive or negative through concept analysis. Compassion, care, warmth, and support are among the positive behaviors, while disrespect, arrogance, and indifference are among the negative behaviors. The health status, compliance, and satisfaction of a patient are greatly influenced by the provider's bedside manner and how that manner is perceived. In order to provide effective patient care, it is essential for Advanced Practice Nurses (APN) to cultivate an effective bedside manner. More research is needed to understand patient expectations and to improve the relationship between patients and providers (Finch, 2008).
The aim of this study is to interpret the perceptions that patients hold regarding shift-to-shift bedside manner. The intention behind conducting this study was to use its findings to help nurses adjust their bedside manner according to the expectations and nature of their patients, and to better understand what patients want from them. This kind of nurse engagement will not only help patients recover but will also encourage them to participate actively in the decision-making process. This study examines patients' perspectives on the shift-to-shift bedside nursing handover.
Review of Literature
Clinical communication plays a very important role in patient safety: it is miscommunication that is largely responsible for many adverse incidents (Haig et al., 2006).
A substantial body of nursing research has been conducted on the bedside nursing handover (Chaboyer et al., 2009a; Chaboyer et al., 2009b; McKenna and Walsh, 1997; McMurray et al., 2009; O'Connell and Penny, 2001). One reason why bedside handover has not been adopted on a wider scale is probably the function and structure of most practice settings, which emphasize the expert practice model rather than a partnership between patients and nurses (Gallant et al., 2002; Brown et al., 2006). When Gallant et al. (2002) conducted a concept analysis of the nurse-patient partnership, they found that the term is linked with mutuality, collaboration, citizen involvement, and participation. They further reported that a more empowering environment now exists for patients, driven largely by a shift toward the more patient-enabling participative approach compared with the traditional expert practice model (Gallant et al., 2002).
In line with this changing trend, nurses are now more involved with their patients, listen to them more closely, and have generally become more attentive — all of which has helped build a trusting relationship between patients and nurses (Brown, McWilliam, & Ward-Griffin, 2006). As a result, patient-centered care empowers patients to become as involved in their treatment and medication as their knowledge and abilities allow (Brown et al., 2006). The professional appreciation of these empowering attributes, as described by Gallant et al. (2002), has been discussed and endorsed in the literature review by Hook (2004). However, Hook noted an absence of theoretical connection in her analysis between nurses' delivery of patient care and the nurse-patient partnership (Hook, 2004). In order to address this lack of connection, Hook (2004) recommended an evaluation of clinical situations.
Definition and Defining Attributes
The term "bedside manner" can be traced back to 1869 and refers to the conduct and behavior of a physician with a patient (Dictionary.com, 2014). To clarify the term "manner" further, it can be described as "a way in which one acts," while "bedside" simply means "the side of a bed."
In light of these definitions, it is clear that "bedside manner" can be understood as the way in which an individual behaves toward others. As Merton (1938) explained, human behavior is best understood within social settings — such as groups, organizations, or communities — where people encounter not only opportunities but also various constraints, and their responses to those situations constitute their behavior.
The features that help define a concept and that appear consistently in the literature whenever the concept is discussed are known as defining attributes (Walker & Avant, 2005). The defining attributes of bedside manner can be sub-categorized into three further attributes: care, compassion, and support (Crawford et al., 2011). It is interesting to note that terms such as friendly, gentle, warm, and kind — which are most prominent in Gilbert (2009) — are rarely used in the broader literature.
References
Bedside manner. (n.d.). The American Heritage Stedman's Medical Dictionary. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from Dictionary.com website:
Benner, P., & Wrubel, J. (1989). The primacy of caring: Stress and coping in health and illness. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Brown, D., McWilliam, C., & Ward-Griffin, C. (2006). Client-centered empowering partnering in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(2), 160–168.
Brykczynska, G. (1997). Caring: The compassion and wisdom of nursing. Arnold.
Chaboyer, W., Johnson, J., Hardy, L., McMurray, A., Wallis, M., & Chu, S. (2009a). Bedside handover: Quality improvement strategy to 'Transform Care at the Bedside.' Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24(2), 136–142.
Chaboyer, W., McMurray, A., & Wallis, M. (2009b). Communicating patient information: Structures, processes and outcomes of bedside handover in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Practice, in press.
Chambers, C., & Ryder, E. (2009). Compassion and caring in nursing. Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
Cingel, M. (2009). Compassion and professional care: Exploring the domain. Nursing Philosophy, 10, 124–136.
Crawford, P., Gilbert, P., Gilbert, J., & Gale, C. (2011). The language of compassion. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 3(1), 1–16.
Dietze, E., & Orb, A. (2000). Compassionate care: A moral dimension of nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 7, 166–174.
Earvolino-Ramirez, M. (2007). Compassion: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 42(2), 48–55.
Epstein, R. M., Franks, P., Shields, C. G., Meldrum, S. C., Miller, K. N., Campbell, T. I., & Fiscella, K. (2005). Patient-centered communication and diagnostic testing. Annals of Family Medicine, 3, 415–421.
Finch, L. (2008). Bedside manner: Concept analysis and impact on advanced nursing practice. The Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice, 10(1).
Gallant, M., Beaulier, M., & Carnevale, F. (2002). Partnership: An analysis of the concept within the nurse-client relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(2), 149–157.
Gilbert, P. (2009). The compassionate mind. Constable Robinson.
Gilbert, P. (2010). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life's challenges. Constable.
Golden, R. L. (1999). William Osler at 150: An overview of a life. Journal of the American Medical Association. In Dossey, L. (2011). Bedside manner: The case for compassion. Retrieved from
Haig, K. M., Sutton, S., & Whittington, J. (2006). SBAR: A shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Joint Commission's Perspectives on Patient Safety, 32, 167–175.
Hook, M. (2004). Partnering with patients — a concept ready for action. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(2), 133–143.
McKenna, L., & Walsh, K. (1997). Changing handover practices: One private hospital's experiences. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 3, 128–132.
McMurray, A. et al. (2010). Patients' perspectives of bedside nursing handover. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from
McMurray, A., Chaboyer, W., Wallis, M., & Fetherston, C. (2009). Implementing bedside handover: Strategies for change management. Journal of Clinical Nursing, in press.
Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.
Nauert, R. (2013). Doctors: Emphasizing compassion & empathy in bedside manner. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from
Nightingale, F. (1969). Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not. Dover Publications.
O'Connell, B., & Penney, W. (2001). Challenging the handover ritual: Recommendations for research and practice. The Collegian, 8, 14–18.
Reiser, M., & Levine, J. (Producers). (2011). 50/50 [Motion picture]. Mandate Pictures.
Silverman, B. D. (2012). Physician behavior and bedside manners: The influence of William Osler and the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Proceedings (Baylor University Medical Center), 25(1), 58–61. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3246857/
Smith, S., Dewer, B., & Pullin, S. (2010). Relationship outcomes focused on compassionate care for older people within in-patient care settings. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 5(2), 128–136.
Ucko, B. (2006). Poked and prodded again and again. Health Affairs, 25(5), 1400–1406. Retrieved from
Walker, L., & Avant, K. (2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (4th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.