This paper examines three distinct business scenarios to illustrate how different legal structures apply to real-world situations. Using a sports bar and restaurant venture, a chain extermination business, and a construction company as case studies, the paper analyzes partnerships, sole proprietorships, and limited liability companies (LLCs). For each entity type, the paper discusses formation requirements, profit and tax obligations, ownership transfer rules, applicable laws and regulations, and the risks each structure presents to its owners. The paper also briefly addresses employment regulations relevant to the construction scenario, including equal opportunity and anti-discrimination requirements.
Business entities vary from country to country, since the formation of a business is governed by the various legal systems instituted in each nation. There are many types of business entities, including sole proprietorships, partnerships, cooperatives, corporations, and limited liability companies, among others (Waddell, 2008). A business may be categorized under any of these entities based on the composition of its members.
In the first business scenario, Jose and Lou want to open a sports bar and restaurant but do not have enough capital to start the business. They therefore need to partner with Miriam, who will be able to finance them but will play a minimal role in management. This situation will lead them to form a partnership type of business entity.
Through a partnership, all of their mutual interests will be served. Jose and Lou will obtain the capital they need through Miriam's contribution. When entering into a partnership, all parties are expected to formulate an agreement that clearly stipulates how the business is to be run, the amount of profit each partner is entitled to based on their contribution and role, each party's responsibilities, how the performance of the business is to be evaluated, and what is to occur should the partners decide to dissolve the business. The agreement is normally tailored to suit the specific business it is intended for (Ostrowski, 2010).
In a partnership entity, the partners share all losses and gains from the business. All partners have a degree of control, but Jose and Lou will be the ones actively running the business and will be compensated for their management role in addition to receiving their share of profits or bearing their share of losses (Waddell, 2008).
Since one of the partners manages the business and receives a stated salary in addition to profit distributions, the business is required to pay the IRS applicable taxes on that salary. In many cases, the managing partner may prefer to receive more in profit distributions and less in salary in order to reduce the tax burden on earned wages. Beyond the salary-related tax, the business must also pay taxes specific to its type of operation and obtain the necessary operating licenses.
A partnership is permitted to transfer ownership or shares to another individual; however, when a significant portion of shares is transferred, the law requires that a new partnership be formed immediately following the termination of the previous agreement (Waddell, 2008).
One major risk in a partnership is that, in the event of losses or debts, the business owners are legally liable to settle all debts that have accrued in the course of operations. Additionally, when one partner manages the business, that partner assumes a proportional share of the associated risk (Ostrowski, 2010).
In the second scenario, Frank, a wealthy businessman, wants to open a chain of extermination businesses. Since he has sufficient capital to start the business on his own, it is appropriate for Frank to operate as a sole proprietor. In a sole proprietorship, the business is owned and run by a single individual, and there is no legal distinction between the business owner and the business itself. The owner receives all profits and is required to pay all taxes specific to the extermination business (Waddell, 2008).
When a business is solely owned, it carries unlimited liability. This means that if the owner incurs debts, he is personally responsible for settling them, since the owner and the business are legally considered one and the same.
"Transfer restrictions, tax duties, and business risks"
"Surebuild Inc. as an LLC with filing requirements"
"Equal opportunity and anti-discrimination hiring rules"
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.