This paper reviews the literature on career aptitude tests, examining how they are designed, how they differ from academic aptitude measures, and how they are applied in educational and professional settings. The review explores early and more recent research on student responses to career aptitude testing, highlights the ACT's EXPLORE program as a prominent example, and addresses criticisms about the ability of such tests to keep pace with a rapidly changing job market. The paper concludes that career aptitude tests are valuable tools for self-discovery and career exploration but should not be treated as definitive authorities in career planning.
One of the most common questions traditionally asked of young people is, "What do you want to be when you grow up?" While some young people have formed an idea about the profession they want to pursue, others remain undecided or ambivalent about their career choices well into their adult lives. In many cases, the indecision involved in making an informed career decision may be related to a lack of information about what career fields are available and which ones best suit an individual's particular talents, temperament, and traits.
To help address this gap, a number of career aptitude tests have been developed over the years to help guide career-seekers into positions that match their interests and abilities. This paper provides a review of the relevant literature to determine how career aptitude tests are typically used, what changes they have undergone in recent years, and how they are used in schools and other settings today. A summary of the research and important findings are presented in the conclusion.
A wide range of academic aptitude tests exist to help educators gauge the potential abilities of students across a number of endeavors, including music ability (Karma, 2007). When it comes to using aptitude tests to help choose a career, however, the range of variables involved is greatly expanded and may include factors that do not appear to readily relate to working environments but which are intended to highlight individual strengths and weaknesses that can be used to fine-tune a career search. In this regard, one vendor emphasizes that "career aptitude tests use a series of questions about your interests, about your style of working, and how you interact with other people. . . . By answering these questions, a career aptitude test can help you figure out your natural preferences and strengths" (Career aptitude test, 2010, para. 2).
Subject-area aptitude tests also tend to differ from career aptitude tests in their use of grades and ages for validation purposes. For instance, according to Sak (2009), "a major criterion used in the validation of a number of intelligence tests is age differentiation. However, the use of age in the validation of aptitude tests is not appropriate because they measure ability that is influenced largely by school learning. Therefore, the major criterion for aptitude tests should be grade differentiation" (p. 53).
An early study involving the use of career aptitude tests, conducted by Ware and Millard (1987), found that an overwhelming majority of students (92%) believed that the career aptitude test they completed — and its interpretation — was an effective way to help them know their abilities more accurately. A more recent study by Bell and Short (2003) found that some career aptitude tests had failed to maintain pace with the current job market and the more lucrative job offerings available. For instance, one interviewee in the Bell and Short study noted that "career goals in the minds of first-year [college] students are largely unexplored, abstract ideals. Gaining life experience narrowed my focus, and instead of following the results of high school career aptitude tests, I pursued marketable skills that I knew I had the character to pull off in a career capacity" (quoted in Bell & Short, 2003, p. 6).
This graduate indicated that rather than relying on the innate abilities identified by the career aptitude test, she "worked realistically with the grit and gumption I possessed, as opposed to counting on my talent to pave the way" (quoted in Bell & Short, 2003, p. 6). Such responses suggest that while career aptitude tests can be informative, real-world experience and personal initiative may ultimately shape career trajectories more decisively. Research from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Outlook Handbook similarly highlights the importance of aligning career choices with both ability and evolving labor market demand.
"ACT EXPLORE test structure and career guidance outputs"
The research showed that aptitude tests are commonly used by educators to help assess the learning readiness of students. The research also showed that educators and employers alike can use career aptitude tests to help identify which career fields are most congruent with an individual's innate abilities and personal preferences. One criticism directed at some career aptitude tests, however, was an inability to keep pace with a rapidly changing job market — an issue that is particularly important in the Information Age, where new career fields are introduced every day and an individual's true potential in those fields may be overlooked in favor of outdated and declining occupational categories.
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.