This essay examines Brian De Palma's Carrie as an unconventional horror film that reverses genre expectations. Unlike typical horror narratives where protagonists battle supernatural evil, Carrie portrays the title character as a sympathetic victim whose telekinetic powers emerge from abuse and bullying by "normal" humans. The essay explores how De Palma uses character contrasts—particularly Sue Snell's redemption versus Chris's cruelty—and Carrie's abusive home life to generate pathos alongside horror. The film ultimately functions as both a horror narrative and a sociological commentary on the real violence inflicted on marginalized and traumatized adolescents, making it a uniquely compelling meditation on how emotional and physical abuse can drive destructive behavior.
Brian De Palma's Carrie stands as an unusual example of the horror genre. Unlike most horror films in which the viewer finds themselves rooting for a protagonist faced with horrific supernatural evil, Carrie inverts this dynamic: the most evil actions are perpetrated by "normal" humans, while the title character remains highly sympathetic—even when she embarks on her murderous rampage at the film's climax. The narrative follows Carrie White, a shy high school senior who is an outcast due to her social awkwardness and her religiously fanatical mother. The opening scene depicts Carrie menstruating for the first time in the girls' gymnasium shower. Unaware of what is happening to her body, she watches in confusion as her classmates react by throwing sanitary napkins and tampons at her, seemingly oblivious to her tears and distress.
If Carrie were an ordinary girl, the film would unfold as a straightforward bullying narrative in which a socially awkward protagonist is persecuted by the most popular students. However, Carrie is no ordinary high school senior. She possesses telekinetic powers—the ability to move objects with her mind. Initially, she uses this power for benign purposes, harming no one. But when the most popular boy in school asks her to prom and she is crowned prom queen, the nastiest and most popular students orchestrate a cruel trick: they drench her with pig's blood. Driven to madness by rage and humiliation, Carrie unleashes her telekinetic fury on the high school gymnasium, triggering a catastrophic destruction that kills nearly everyone present.
This scenario might appear to position Carrie as a traditional horror villain—a destructive force unleashed upon the innocent. Yet De Palma's direction ensures that the audience understands Carrie's rage not as random evil but as a comprehensible, even justified, response to systematic cruelty.
The film's moral complexity becomes most apparent through the contrasting characters of Sue Snell and Chris Hargensen, both of whom bullied Carrie in the opening shower scene. Sue, feeling genuine remorse for her participation in Carrie's humiliation, convinces her boyfriend Tommy to take Carrie to prom instead of herself, hoping to give Carrie a taste of social acceptance and popularity. This redemptive gesture reveals that Sue recognizes her wrongdoing and attempts to make amends, even at personal cost.
Chris, by contrast, doubles down on her cruelty. Rather than seeking redemption, she engineers the pig's blood prank with calculated malice. While both girls face punishment for their earlier bullying—as the narrative demands—their responses to that punishment differ fundamentally. Sue's capacity for empathy and change contrasts sharply with Chris's refusal to evolve morally. In the film's tragic conclusion, everyone dies except Sue, who is safely away from the gymnasium when Carrie's powers unleash destruction. This survival is not random; it reflects the film's moral logic: Sue's attempt at redemption grants her a kind of grace, while Chris's persistent cruelty ensures her doom.
Carrie remains sympathetic even as she kills because the audience understands her as an abused child. Throughout the film, her mother routinely beats her, locks her in a closet, and instills crushing guilt about her sexuality and bodily autonomy. These scenes of domestic violence are as horrifying as any supernatural terror. In the lead-up to prom, Carrie gradually asserts autonomy and stands up to her mother's tyranny, suggesting a path toward healing. Yet this fragile liberation is shattered when her mother murders her in a final act of violent control. The subsequent collapse of the house where they lived symbolizes the destruction of this toxic family legacy—a structure built on abuse that inevitably implodes.
The film thus argues that Carrie's destructive rage is not an inexplicable eruption of evil but a logical, even inevitable, consequence of sustained psychological and physical abuse. Her telekinetic power becomes a metaphor for the destructive potential of repressed trauma when it finally breaks free.
Perhaps the most horrifying scene in the film occurs at its very end. Sue dreams that she is visiting Carrie's grave, only to see Carrie's hand reach up from the earth and attempt to pull her down. Sue awakens, but the sudden shock of that reaching hand lingers in the viewer's mind long after the film ends. Throughout, De Palma blends horror and pathos in a unique and compelling manner.
"Film merges horror with social commentary on adolescent violence"
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.