This case study examines the challenges facing a multinational accounting and auditing firm's Central Employee Development Center (CEDC), a training program under strain from rapid workforce expansion. The paper identifies five core problems: the CEDC's perceived financial burden, unknown program efficacy, high employee attrition, difficulty meeting management pipeline targets, and a lack of interpersonal skills training. For each problem, the paper evaluates multiple alternatives, weighing advantages and disadvantages, before recommending specific solutions including virtual training environments, measurable KPIs, above-average entry-level salaries, accelerated promotion timelines, and interpersonal skills screening during recruitment. A step-by-step implementation plan concludes the analysis.
It has recently been suggested that interpersonal skills should be incorporated into employee training programs. However, many senior partners believe the company is already spending too much on training and development, particularly given that many employees who benefit from these programs leave the organization before reaching management or partner level. With the company facing an expanding workforce, the Central Employee Development Center (CEDC) program represents a significant challenge for the multinational firm.
The CEDC is viewed by many managers as a substantial financial burden. At the same time, it is envied by competitors, since the program trains new hires and develops their skills to improve both individual performance and the company's overall results. With increasing waves of new employees expected, the program will require even greater financial resources — and because expansion is occurring at an international level, these costs are projected to grow exponentially.
One training director raised a pointed concern about the program's effectiveness: "For years we've been throwing tons of training at these people, but we aren't sure if it's the right kind, if it's too much, or even if they're catching what we're throwing!" This statement highlights that despite significant financial investment, the efficiency and efficacy of the CEDC remain largely unknown to management.
The company spends an average of $1,200 per year per employee on training activities, yet a large proportion of new hires leave before reaching manager or partner level, resulting in a high employee attrition rate. Every departure means recruiting and training a replacement — a process that involves both financial costs and a period during which the new employee must learn internal processes, systems, and client relations.
The company maintains a policy of promoting from within, but the average time to reach partner level is ten years. Given projected growth in the accounting and auditing industry, the company forecasts a need for 900 new managers and 200 new partners within five years. Given the current attrition rate and the ten-year timeline, achieving these targets will be extremely difficult, as many entry-level employees leave long before they could be considered for senior roles.
The CEDC does not currently address interpersonal skills. Observations indicate that some clients have discontinued their relationships with the company, and in numerous other cases, the assertiveness of new employees has damaged client relationships — particularly in the healthcare and real estate sectors. Because most entry-level hires lack prior work experience, they tend to have underdeveloped interpersonal skills. Structured training focused on these competencies could accelerate their development, but management is reluctant to allocate additional resources. Any expansion of the program under current conditions would require significant restructuring.
"Pros and cons of multiple solutions per problem"
"Recommended solution chosen for each problem"
"Step-by-step action plan for recommended changes"
You’re 24% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.