This paper examines the change management initiatives involved in implementing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, emphasizing the complexity of aligning people, processes, and information technology. Drawing on the Images of Change framework, the paper identifies transformational (Coach-style) leadership as the most effective approach for guiding ERP projects. It discusses how senior management commitment, employee ownership of the implementation process, and trust-building are critical to overcoming resistance and achieving successful outcomes. The paper synthesizes lessons learned from both successful and unsuccessful ERP implementations to highlight best practices in change management strategy.
The paper effectively uses a theoretical lens — the Images of Managing framework — to organize and interpret practical evidence. Rather than simply listing best practices, the author anchors recommendations in a recognized conceptual model, which strengthens the academic credibility of the argument and shows how theory and practice inform each other.
The paper opens with an introduction that defines the problem and introduces the theoretical framework. The Application Analysis section applies that framework to ERP change management, addressing resistance, leadership styles, and employee engagement. The Lessons Learned section distills actionable success factors, including top management involvement and trust-building. The paper closes with a properly formatted APA reference list.
The change management initiatives involved in implementing a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system are multitudinous and complex, requiring the optimal selection of a management framework, leadership direction, and organizational structure. In short, for change management strategies on ERP projects to be successful, there must be a significant level of orchestration at the people, process, and information technology levels of any organization (Aladwani, 2001).
The Images of Change concept is directly relevant to ERP system implementation strategies. Each of the six management and leadership styles defined by the matrix of Images of Change Outcomes by Images of Managing illustrates the full spectrum of styles used in organizations attempting to replace or upgrade their existing ERP systems. Of these six images of managing, the majority of studies indicate that transformational leaders are by far the most effective — corresponding to the Coach style in the context of the matrix (Carton, Adam, & Sammon, 2008). Given the depth and breadth of complexity inherent in ERP implementations, transformational leadership is critically important, as employees must see themselves and their roles within the broader vision of change (Ash & Burn, 2003).
Change management initiatives surrounding ERP system planning, implementation, and continual refinement are highly dependent on ensuring the new system aligns with the specific business strategies and needs of the enterprise. When existing ERP systems are either enhanced or replaced, there is significant anxiety, fear, and resistance to change, as these enterprise-class information platforms deliver knowledge that accentuates people's status (Carton, Adam, & Sammon, 2008). Changing these systems will often lead to initial resistance and a tendency to push back against legacy processes, procedures, and applications.
Change management strategies often begin with a comprehensive overview of what the overriding objectives of the implementation are, what the specific system functions are, and how each employee involved in the implementation will have a voice in how the final system is designed (Kemp & Low, 2008). Above all else, senior management must demonstrate belief in and strong commitment to the change for it to succeed (Aladwani, 2001). Best practices in this area are achieved when companies rely on transformational or Coach-based leadership rather than transactional or authoritarian-based approaches (Ash & Burn, 2003).
The greater the degree to which those most affected by the ERP implementation perceive the new system as a complement to their existing work, the lower the resistance to change. Senior management must take on a visible leadership role for this perception to take hold.
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.