Change Management Strategies: Perrier Case Study Analysis
This paper examines organizational change management through the lens of the Perrier case study. It identifies key drivers of change — including competitive pressures, economic conditions, and shifting consumer trends — before analyzing why employees resist change and the consequences that resistance can have on implementation. The paper then applies these concepts directly to Perrier, identifying specific indicators of resistance such as poor labor-management relations, union opposition, and managerial provocation. Drawing on Lewin's three-stage model of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing, the paper proposes a structured change management strategy, including communication, coalition-building with the union, and disciplinary measures where necessary. The role of senior management in leading and legitimizing the change process is also discussed.
- Drivers of Organizational Change: Competition, economy, and consumer trends drive change
- Employee Resistance to Change: Fear and uncertainty cause employee resistance
- Resistance to Change at Perrier: Union opposition and management conflict at Perrier
- Change Management Models and Strategies: Lewin's model applied to Perrier's situation
- The Role of Senior Management in Change: Leaders must visibly champion the change process
- References: Academic sources cited throughout the paper
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper follows a clear question-and-answer structure that builds logically from general theory to specific case application, making abstract concepts immediately concrete through the Perrier example.
- It consistently integrates academic citations to support each claim, grounding practical observations in established organizational behavior literature.
- The discussion of Lewin's three-stage model is applied directly to the Perrier scenario rather than described in isolation, demonstrating strong analytical connection between theory and practice.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies applied theory analysis: it introduces a well-known framework (Lewin's change model) and uses it as a diagnostic and prescriptive tool for a real organizational situation. Rather than merely describing the model, the student maps each stage onto Perrier's circumstances, explaining what actions management should take at each phase and why — a hallmark of higher-order application in business studies.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into five thematic sections corresponding to discrete questions. Section one covers macro-level change drivers. Section two introduces the general concept of employee resistance. Section three diagnoses Perrier's specific resistance indicators. Section four proposes a structured change management response using Lewin's model. Section five addresses senior management's leadership role. A reference list closes the paper. This scaffolded structure moves from general to specific and from diagnosis to prescription.
Drivers of Organizational Change
In any organization there is a need for change; without it, organizations will stagnate and fail to adapt to shifting environments. There are many drivers of change. Changes in the competitive environment — resulting from the lowering of barriers to trade, increasing use of technology to facilitate international commerce, and advances in transportation technology — all raise the level of competition firms face in the market (Salawu and Agboola, 2011, p. 235). Increasing competition can be a significant driver for incumbent firms to develop and maintain competitive advantage, which in turn may drive the need for innovation. This dynamic was evident at Perrier with the introduction of Badoit Rouge. Where competition arrives from offshore locations, firms may also face price pressure, as many overseas producers benefit from comparative advantage and are able to offer lower prices (Nellis and Parker, 2006, p. 139).
The general state of the economy can also drive change. During a recession, for example, declining aggregate demand leads to lower sales, which reduces the benefits of economies of scope and scale. Lower sales produce lower profits and potential losses, compelling firms to find ways to survive by cutting costs or increasing efficiency.
Consumer fashions and trends also affect how businesses operate and how consumers choose — or choose not — to buy products. This is apparent across many markets; the fashion industry is one of the most transparent examples, but it applies to almost all sectors. Perrier benefited from precisely this kind of trend during the 1980s, when bottled water became fashionable. Firms must monitor their markets and assess consumer needs so they can adapt their products and marketing strategies to meet emerging demands (Hooley et al., 2007, p. 277).
Employee Resistance to Change
When changes are implemented, employees will experience a degree of uncertainty. It is natural for employees to have concerns during this process — particularly when they do not understand why the change is occurring or cannot assess what impact it will have on their jobs. The change process has the potential to generate fear and resistance (Buchanan and Huczynski, 2010, p. 561). Generally speaking, employees dislike change.
Resistance from employees can make change difficult to implement. It can increase the time required for the change to take effect, raise the associated costs and resource demands, and may even cause the change initiative to fail altogether (Thomas and Hardy, 2011, p. 322; Buchanan and Huczynski, 2010, p. 562).
Resistance to Change at Perrier
Several issues at Perrier indicate resistance to change. The poor employment relationship between employees and management is a clear indicator. The case shows that management sought to make a 15% cut in the workforce — a measure unlikely to be accepted by employees, as it directly threatens their interests. Furthermore, if employees do not understand how and why the cuts are to take place or what strategies will be used, there is increased scope for fear and hostility.
The presence of the union and its opposing attitude also signals resistance. The union can be understood as a centre of influence: it not only reflects employee views but actively shapes them. Given Perrier's long history of success — marked by pay rises, bonuses, and the backing of a major parent company — the union's stance indicates that employees feel they are being disregarded. This sentiment is captured in the union's assertion that Nestlé can do as it likes.
A third element of resistance is visible in the way management has handled the situation. Rather than addressing resistance constructively, management provoked a confrontation — most notably by placing Badoit Rouge bottles in the staff canteen. Employees responded by dumping the bottles outside the factory director's door, blocking him from entering his own office. This escalation illustrates how managerial missteps can intensify rather than resolve organizational conflict.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.