Essay Undergraduate 768 words

The Knight's Tale in Canterbury Tales: Narrator Analysis

~4 min read

Abstract

This essay examines Geoffrey Chaucer's Knight's Tale from The Canterbury Tales, focusing on lines 875–885 to analyze what the Knight's narrative choices reveal about his character. The paper argues that the Knight's repeated claims of having no time to describe certain events — battles, wedding feasts, and tempests — serve three possible purposes: projecting an image of hard work and busyness, presenting himself as a man of action rather than words, or concealing a limited descriptive imagination. Through close reading of the Knight's rhetorical devices and stated omissions, the essay concludes that the Knight, like many of Chaucer's narrators, uses storytelling to manage his audience's perception while inadvertently exposing his own dishonesty and self-importance.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

The paper builds a clear three-part interpretive framework — busyness, action over words, and lack of imagination — and develops each point in a dedicated paragraph, giving the argument coherent structure.
It uses close textual reading, quoting specific lines from the poem to ground analytical claims rather than relying on vague generalization.
The irony identified in the final body paragraph — that the rest of the tale is quite long, undercutting the Knight's claim of having no time — is an astute observation that strengthens the overall argument.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates unreliable narrator analysis: it treats the Knight's stated reasons for omitting material not as face value truth but as evidence of character, reading what is left unsaid as revealing as what is said. This technique, common in literary criticism, is applied here by noting the gap between the Knight's self-justifications and the probable reality of his motives.

Structure breakdown

The essay follows a classic five-paragraph structure: a brief introduction establishing the central question, three body paragraphs each advancing a distinct interpretive possibility, and a conclusion that synthesizes the findings into a character judgment. Each body paragraph opens with a claim, supports it with a quotation, and then interrogates that claim for evidence of self-interest or deception.

Introduction: The Knight as Narrator

The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer represents a great turning point in the history of literature. Its value to readers of Chaucer's time was entertainment that related to every level of society. Chaucer included storytellers from all classes and backgrounds — the clergy, for example, view themselves as somewhat better than others, although many of their tales reveal just the opposite. Many of the tales, in fact, reveal more about their narrators than the latter may have intended.

One such tale is the Knight's Tale. An analysis of lines 875–885 can reveal several things about the Knight: that he tries to give an impression of the difficulty of his own work, that he is a man of action rather than words, or that he lacks sufficient imagination to describe the events he mentions. Each of these possibilities points to a narrator who is less straightforward than he presents himself to be.

Projecting Hard Work and Busyness

One possibility behind the Knight's repeated claim that he has no time to tell various elements of his tale is that he wishes to give the rest of the company the impression that he is very busy and works very hard. To convey this, he uses the lines: "God knows, I have a large field to plough, and my oxen are weak." The Knight implies here that he carries more than his share of the burden, and that even those meant to help him are not fully equipped for the task. He even calls God as witness — perhaps to appeal to the clergy within the company.

This, combined with his claim to have such a very large field to plow, gives the impression that the Knight is not entirely honest. In this regard, he is in good company, since few of the other pilgrims have shown themselves to be fully candid either.

2 Locked Sections · 235 words remaining

A Man of Action Rather Than Words · 135 words

"Knight frames omissions as concern for companions"

Omitted Details and Narrative Imagination · 100 words

"Skipped events suggest limited descriptive power"

Conclusion: The Knight's Self-Revealing Dishonesty

It appears that the Knight, like many others in the company, has a somewhat high opinion of himself, his strength, the difficulty of his work, and the way in which others see him. For this reason, he uses whatever narrative devices are at his disposal to make his tale as interesting as he can, without highlighting his own flaws. Instead, he conceals those flaws beneath rhetorical strategies in order to impress his hearers.

You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Unreliable Narrator Narrative Omission Knight's Tale Canterbury Tales Self-Presentation Rhetorical Device Medieval Storytelling Character Revelation Chaucer's Narrators Literary Irony