This essay examines the nature and importance of spirituality in children's development, distinguishing it from formal religious doctrine and framing it as a holistic quality of experience rooted in meaning, connectedness, and ethical awareness. Drawing on Albert Einstein's famous question about the universe's friendliness, the paper argues that spirituality fosters confidence, resilience, and emotional health in children. It also surveys early-millennium scholarship on Spiritual Intelligence (SQ) — including work by Zohar and Marshall, Noble, and Sisk and Torrance — and concludes by outlining three practical elements of spirituality that teachers and parents can actively nurture.
The paper synthesizes a cluster of early-millennium sources on Spiritual Intelligence (Noble, 2001; Sisk & Torrance, 2001; Zohar & Marshall, 2000) to position spirituality as a legitimate cognitive and developmental domain alongside emotional and social intelligence. This literature-anchoring technique lends credibility to what might otherwise appear as a personal advocacy essay.
The essay moves from definition → philosophical rationale → scholarly validation → contemporary urgency → practical application. This funnel structure begins broad and abstract, then narrows to three concrete, actionable elements that teachers and parents can address directly, giving the paper both theoretical and practical dimensions.
What is spirituality, and why is it important to children? Spirituality, in the context of this essay, does not refer to any rigid body of dogma or rules. Rather, it goes beyond that, referring to a true wholesomeness and integrity of experience where, using Webster's definition, the child is taught to show "much refinement of thought and feeling." Rather than existence becoming trite and mundane — as happens for so many people — and rather than the child developing into a cynical, distrustful adult, the child gains an enduring freshness of perspective and faith in people and in God that directs all his or her relationships.
Some consider spirituality to be apart from the world, existing as it were in a vacuum, where the individual isolates himself from worldly interaction, viewing such contact as contaminating. Such a message may stunt the child, causing him or her to view the world as a hostile domain. Spirituality, rather, is a more broadminded and expanded way of seeing the world — one that embraces rather than withdraws from human experience.
Children, too, are physical beings with a spiritual purpose. They need to appreciate their own significance in this world, the significance of the world for them, and the significance of other human beings. People and nature are related — all part of one glorious, meaningful cycle. Realizing and internalizing this, children become more confident in themselves, more open and generous in their communication with others, and more integrated as human beings. The world becomes a happier place for them; they are more open to love, more able to express it, and they grow into more resilient, secure, and emotionally healthy individuals.
Albert Einstein was once asked, "What is the most important question that a human being needs to answer?" He replied, "Is the universe a friendly place or not?" (Jenkins, 1995). This is precisely the message that spirituality — as taught by parent and teacher — hopes to impart to the child.
Various writers and psychologists perceive spirituality as another component of intelligence, situated alongside Emotional Intelligence and Social Intelligence. A significant body of literature emerged on this subject at the beginning of the millennium, with titles centered on the concept of Spiritual Intelligence — for example, Noble (2001), Sisk and Torrance (2001), and Zohar and Marshall (2000). Each of these works argued that spiritual skills would help children in their secular education and in the broader so-called "secular" world, and that spirituality is a significant and neglected part of the cognitive realm.
According to Zohar and Marshall (2000), spiritual intelligence is:
The intelligence with which we address and solve problems of meaning and value, the intelligence with which we can place our actions and our lives in a wider, richer, meaning-giving context, the intelligence with which we can assess that one course of action or one life-path is more meaningful than another (pp. 3–4).
This framing positions spiritual development not as peripheral to education but as central to a child's capacity for purposeful, ethical, and meaningful living.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.