This paper argues that community colleges serve as essential stepping stones in American higher education, offering students foundational skills, academic preparation, and practical knowledge before entering four-year institutions. Drawing on historical analysis and empirical research, the paper examines how community colleges evolved from seven educational innovation streams and continue to provide accessible pathways for working-class, low-income, and underprepared students. The paper addresses criticisms of community colleges while demonstrating their vital role in the broader educational ecosystem and their contributions to student success in bachelor's degree programs.
In a world in need of strong leaders with determination and drive, it is important to acknowledge the need for a firm foundation. When speaking of a firm foundation, one refers to education itself. Students are often placed into learning situations for which they do not have the proper tools or training. For this reason, attending a community college or two-year trade school before entering a four-year program offers significant advantages. This approach provides an opportunity to sharpen academic and interpersonal skills while clarifying future goals. Without this preparation, many students struggle, drop out, or later must return to community college to acquire the necessary coping skills and tools for success in a four-year program. However, every opportunity comes with potential drawbacks worth examining.
Community colleges offer an avenue of education not otherwise feasible for many working-class individuals and current high school students. A study by Knox, Lindsay, and Kolb supports this reality, reporting that community colleges have opened higher educational opportunities to many working-class and minority students. Although the researchers note that community colleges offer a less expansive curriculum and describe community college as a "poor stepping stone" in some respects, they do acknowledge that community colleges provide opportunities to take entry-level courses despite their "narrowly focused education." (Knox, Lindsay, and Kolb 17)
Economic factors significantly influence institutional choice. Whether for academic or financial reasons—or a combination of the two—low-income students are more likely than their affluent peers to choose institutions offering programs of two years or less. Low-income students are somewhat more likely than their middle- and upper-income peers to attend public community and vocational colleges (50 percent versus 42 percent) and far more likely to attend two-year and less-than-two-year for-profit institutions (21 percent versus 4 percent). Conversely, low-income students were less likely than middle- and upper-income students to attend public and private not-for-profit four-year institutions. More than half of middle- and upper-income freshmen began at four-year institutions, compared with only 29 percent of low-income freshmen (King 9).
The United States has adapted to and capitalized on the diversity of peoples, regions, and economic conditions in part through the practical and adaptive nature of its educational system. A key feature has been the multiple avenues of public access to education at all levels. At the postsecondary level, the comprehensive community college has made a singular contribution to this adaptiveness and practicality (Baker, Dudziak, and Tyler 3). Community college continues to offer flexibility to the current and past educational system. An education at the two-year level gives students the opportunity to experience education at their own pace while familiarizing themselves with how higher education operates—how to schedule classes, study properly, and use a library effectively. These are all necessary tools for a successful four-year college experience.
As a distinctively American invention, the comprehensive community college stands between secondary and higher education, between adult and continuing education, and between industrial training and formal technical education. Community colleges have provided educational programs and services to people who otherwise would not have enrolled in a college or university (Cohen and Brawer). Access to community colleges has not been bounded by traditional admissions examinations or high school grade requirements. Instead, community colleges have stood for open admissions, geographic proximity, and relative financial affordability for potential students in the communities and regions they serve. Within the structure of American higher education, the community college's contribution has been increased accessibility and pragmatic curricular diversity geared to local and regional needs. This structure supports the premise that community colleges serve as a stepping stone to four-year institutions and other educational levels, making community college a necessary component of one's education.
The community college evolved from seven streams of educational innovation. Two came from the latter half of the nineteenth century: (1) local community and (2) the rise of the research university. Three more trace to the educational reforms of the Progressive Era: (3) the restructuring and expansion of the public educational system, (4) the professionalization of teacher education, and (5) the vocational education movement. The final two streams—(6) the rise of adult, continuing, and community education and (7) open public access to higher education—appeared even in the earliest junior colleges but became prominent after World War II (Baker, Dudziak, and Tyler).
Community colleges also serve students who lack a high school diploma, older adults, and pre-graduate applicants by offering the opportunity to earn lower-division credits. High school students can take classes fulfilling core requirements in language, mathematics, history, and basic sciences, typically completed during the first two years of college. Community college fees are usually low, and even when tuition per unit seems high, students avoid the substantial living expenses they would incur while attending a residential institution (Patrick 76). This further demonstrates the significance of considering community college as a primary alternative to four-year education and as an effective complement to other educational levels.
"Distinguishing types of two-year institutions"
Adding to the confusion is that the term "community college" is now used generically to refer to all colleges awarding no higher than a two-year degree. Yet many two-year colleges do not offer the comprehensive curriculum just outlined and therefore are not truly community colleges in this comprehensive sense. "Junior college" refers to an institution whose primary mission is to provide general and liberal education leading to transfer and completion of the baccalaureate degree. Junior colleges often provide applied science and adult and continuing education programs as well. "Technical college" and "technical institute" refer only to institutions awarding no higher than a two-year degree or diploma in a vocational, technical, or career field. Technical colleges often also offer degrees in applied sciences and in adult and continuing education (Knox, Lindsay, and Kolb).
Higher education in the United States is frequently described in terms of the five Carnegie classifications: research universities, doctoral-granting universities, comprehensive institutions, liberal arts colleges, and two-year colleges. Yet nearly one-half of all higher education institutions are two-year colleges. The very existence of such a variety of two-year institutions—community, junior, and technical colleges—attests to the difficulty of providing a generic definition or casting meaningful generalizations about their role in society. The mix and blend of the seven educational innovation streams in the history of each two-year college ensures that an exception can be found to most, if not all, generalizations about two-year colleges as a whole.
Contemporary discussion regarding the mission, role, and function of community colleges relies on historical notions of institutional evolution. If one emphasizes the vocational education stream, one may conclude that community colleges are departing from higher education (Clowes and Levin). If one examines the success of students who otherwise would not have attended college, then one may conclude that community colleges either track students into certain social strata or advance their station in society (Brint and Karabel). Examining the adult education and community services function leads one to conclude that the institutions' roots are found in providing educational programming and services to local communities. This has been proven and reaffirmed throughout this discussion: the need is being met by community colleges.
"Community college partnerships and educational alignment"
Though society as a whole may not agree on whether community college is a necessary step, one must consider its significance in American educational history. Community colleges have become linked not only to four-year colleges but also to all other levels of education. This is a level of education that deserves serious consideration and the respect and appreciation it has earned. Some may argue that community college is unnecessary, even a deterrent from "true" education. However, this perspective misses the strategic value of preparation. Just as one studies and prepares before an important test, adequate preparation through community college is essential for success in a four-year college program.
You’re 77% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.