Community Colleges in America: History, Teaching, and Access
This paper surveys a broad range of scholarly works addressing the history, mission, and instructional practices of community colleges in the United States. Drawing on books, handbook chapters, and journal articles, it examines debates over academic excellence and student preparedness, the evolution of two-year colleges from junior colleges to comprehensive institutions, online and distance learning, diverse learning styles, adult and older learner education, minority student achievement, and curricular development. The paper also considers how community colleges serve nontraditional students and how institutional culture, teaching methodologies, and assessment practices shape educational outcomes at these institutions.
- Introduction: Excellence and Criticism in American Education: 1980s policy reports critique American school quality
- History and Mission of the Community College: Evolution of two-year colleges and transfer mission
- Teaching Methodologies and Learning Styles: Learning style frameworks and classroom strategies
- Technology, Distance Learning, and the Internet: Online learning and web-based instruction effectiveness
- Adult Learners, Older Students, and Nontraditional Populations: Nontraditional and older adult learner needs
- Minority Students, Achievement, and Equity: Ethnic differences in achievement attribution and access
- Curriculum, Assessment, and Institutional Culture: Curriculum determinants and higher education assessment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Synthesizes a wide range of primary sources — books, journal articles, and handbook chapters — into a coherent thematic survey without losing the specificity of individual works.
- Balances breadth with depth: each source receives a focused summary that highlights its central argument and key evidence, giving readers a clear picture of the literature.
- Grounds abstract pedagogical debates in concrete examples, such as statistical findings from the Powers and Rossman study on ethnic attributions, and specific strategies from Dunn and Griggs's PEPS framework.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates annotated bibliography-style synthesis, moving source by source while implicitly grouping works by theme (teaching methods, technology, diversity, curriculum). This technique is useful for literature review assignments because it shows command of multiple sources while maintaining clarity about each author's distinct contribution to the field.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with policy critiques of American education from the 1980s, then shifts to foundational texts on community college history and teaching practice. It moves through learning styles research, technology integration, adult and older learner education, and minority achievement studies before closing with curriculum theory and institutional assessment frameworks. The Works Cited section follows MLA format throughout.
Introduction: Excellence and Criticism in American Education
In 1983 and 1984, a dozen major reports on United States schools were published, all stressing the need for "excellence" in education. These reports are the subject of Excellence in Education: Perspectives on Policy and Practice. The reports pertaining to higher education were published by the Business-Higher Education Forum, which saw higher education as "unable to train skilled managers and technicians that they believed industry needed" (Altbach 32). These reports essentially claim that student achievement has declined at technical schools because schools "do not demand enough of their students, do not apply stiff criteria for promotion, do not test students enough, and particularly in high school, provide students with too many choices about what subjects they study" (Altbach 32).
These reports are somewhat dated in that they compare American students with Japanese students and focus on technical proficiency versus the intuitive grasp of problems and methodologies for solving them — a quality since cited as a strength of American workers. The reports hold that graduates are mediocre at best, and that this mediocrity — directly produced by the schools — is responsible for high unemployment rates and America's decline in defense and world trade. The Paideia Proposal and the College Board Reports claim that colleges have slackened their admissions requirements, admitting a larger proportion of unqualified applicants. These reports argue that schools can address this by teaching more English and foreign languages, focusing on the sciences at the high school level, and using aptitude tests to measure performance at the college level. They also fault schools for failing to encourage students to enroll in math-related or biology programs.
History and Mission of the Community College
In A Handbook on the Community College in America, Baker, Dudziak, and Tyler provide a comprehensive study of the history and development of the two-year college, current teaching methodologies, and how these colleges function in an urban setting. In "Part 3: Curriculum and Instructional Development in The Community College," Albert Smith details the teaching practices utilized in American community colleges. The chapter includes "a brief history of instructional innovation and change in U.S. community colleges, describe the increasingly diverse student body that now attends U.S. two-year colleges, and consider the future, including a discussion of some learning principles, a learning theory, and research on community college faculty that should be useful to community college faculty in future years" (Baker, Dudziak, and Tyler 206). The book not only addresses teaching methodologies at two-year schools but also dedicates sections to the history of community colleges and how they interact with the urban learning environment.
In "The Community College: Educating Students at the Margin Between College and Work," Thomas Kane and Cecilia Rouse "survey the available evidence on the impacts of community colleges on educational attainment and earnings" (Kane and Rouse 63). The authors comment on the changing nature of teaching at these institutions: "Originally, junior colleges focused on what is termed the 'transfer function': students would complete two years of a general undergraduate education and earn an associate's degree at the two-year college, and those who wanted and were capable would transfer to a four-year college to complete a bachelor's degree. Since then, two-year colleges have broadened their mission to include vocational degree programs, continuing adult education programs, and workforce, economic and community development programs. In addition, community colleges have traditionally striven to increase access to higher education through an open admissions policy — often not even requiring a high school diploma — and low, or no, tuition" (Kane and Rouse 65).
Joseph F. Kett's The Pursuit of Knowledge under Difficulties: From Self-Improvement to Adult Education in America, 1750–1990 traces the evolution of adult education across American history. It begins with self-education as portrayed before formal institutions existed — the first universities did not appear in the United States until the late 1800s. Kett also examines the class and social differences produced by the limited availability of adult education, while noting that the advent of industry ultimately necessitated its development. Moving into the twentieth century, he reviews contemporary innovations including the advent of junior colleges and eventually community colleges as they exist today. He also reviews industrial education as it was introduced at the turn of the century, later refined as workers faced domestic and international competition, and ultimately adapted to a working environment that constantly demands skill updates. Throughout, the author draws comparisons between modern innovations and those that predominated in the nineteenth century.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.