Skip to main content
Case Study Graduate 889 words

Contraception and Menorrhagia Management: A Case Study

~5 min read
Abstract

This case study examines a 38-year-old woman presenting with heavy menstrual bleeding and difficulty adhering to oral contraceptive pills. The patient's medical history includes a seizure disorder managed with lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine, exercise-induced asthma, and irritable bowel syndrome. The paper outlines subjective and objective clinical findings, develops differential diagnoses including menorrhagia and contraception non-adherence, and proposes a management plan. Key considerations include the selection of a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC), diagnostic workup for anemia and anatomical causes of bleeding, and the potential for drug interactions between antiepileptic medications and hormonal contraceptives.

Key Takeaways
  • Patient Overview and Chief Complaint: Patient demographics, chief complaint, and current medications
  • Review of Systems and Medical History: Full ROS, family, reproductive, and social history
  • Physical Examination and Diagnostic Findings: Physical exam results and diagnostic workup indicated
  • Differential Diagnoses: Three diagnoses including menorrhagia and drug interaction
  • Management Plan and Clinical Recommendations: LARC options, diagnostics, and neurologist consultation
  • Conclusion and Follow-Up: Drug interaction counseling and follow-up monitoring
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper follows a structured SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) format, which mirrors real clinical documentation and demonstrates professional healthcare communication.
  • It integrates patient-specific factors — including medication history, adherence challenges, and family history — into each clinical recommendation rather than offering generic advice.
  • The plan section appropriately highlights the need for interdisciplinary consultation, specifically recommending neurologist involvement before initiating hormonal contraception.

Key academic technique demonstrated

This paper demonstrates evidence-based clinical reasoning by grounding each recommendation in cited literature. For example, the recommendation for a hormonal IUD is supported by a reference addressing contraceptive choice in young women, and the concern about antiepileptic drug interactions is backed by a pediatric and epilepsy-focused journal article. This practice of linking clinical decisions to peer-reviewed sources is essential in advanced health sciences writing.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with full patient intake information presented in standard clinical format (subjective, ROS, objective), transitions into an assessment with three differential diagnoses, and concludes with a multi-part management plan covering diagnostics, contraceptive counseling, drug interaction education, and follow-up. The references section is formatted in APA style. The overall flow mirrors a clinical case write-up appropriate for graduate-level health sciences coursework.

Patient Overview and Chief Complaint

The patient is a 38-year-old Caucasian female who works full-time. She presents with two primary concerns: heavy menstrual bleeding and difficulty adhering to her current contraceptive regimen.

Chief Complaint (CC): The patient reports difficulty remembering to take oral contraceptive pills regularly. She is experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding and is seeking a more effective and manageable contraceptive method.

History of Present Illness (HPI): The primary concerns are heavy menstrual bleeding and contraception management. She previously used oral contraceptive pills but discontinued them due to difficulty taking them consistently.

Current Medications: The patient is currently taking Lamictal (lamotrigine) and Trileptal (oxcarbazepine) for a seizure disorder.

Allergies: No known drug allergies.

Past Medical History (PMH): Medical history includes exercise-induced asthma, a seizure disorder, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). No significant surgical history except a tonsillectomy in childhood.

Review of Systems and Medical History

Social and Substance History: The patient does not smoke or use recreational drugs and does not consume alcohol. No specific information is available regarding her exercise routine or safety habits.

Family History: Family history includes dementia, COPD, osteopenia, fibromyalgia, and skin cancer.

Mental Health History: No history of mental illness.

Violence History: No history of violence reported.

Reproductive History: The patient has had three partners in the past year, including her current partner of two months. She reports heavy periods. Previous contraception consisted of oral contraceptive pills, which she discontinued due to difficulty with consistent use.

Review of Systems (ROS):

General: Vital signs are within normal limits — pulse 68, BP 118/72, weight 148 lbs., height 5'7". No significant changes from the previous year.

HEENT: Within normal limits (WNL).

Cardiovascular: WNL.

Respiratory: WNL, with the exception of exercise-induced asthma.

Gastrointestinal: Reports of IBS.

Genitourinary: Reports of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Neurological: Seizure disorder, currently under control. Last reported seizure occurred five years ago.

Musculoskeletal: WNL.

Hematologic: No reports of anemia, abnormal bleeding, or bruising.

Lymphatics: WNL.

Psychiatric: No history of depression or anxiety.

Endocrinologic: WNL.

Reproductive: No desire for future pregnancy. Interested in exploring contraceptive options.

Physical Examination and Diagnostic Findings

Physical Examination: The patient's primary concerns remain heavy menstrual bleeding and the need for reliable contraception. Physical examination reveals a first-degree cystocele.

Diagnostic Results: Given her menstrual history, further diagnostic investigation is warranted to rule out any underlying conditions contributing to heavy menstrual bleeding.

2 locked sections · 340 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Differential Diagnoses50 words
Three primary differential diagnoses are identified for this patient:
Management Plan and Clinical Recommendations290 words
The patient should undergo further testing, including blood work, to rule out anemia resulting from heavy menstrual bleeding, and possibly a pelvic ultrasound to identify any anatomical causes for her symptoms. Blood tests could help determine whether her heavy menstrual cycle has…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools

Conclusion and Follow-Up

She should also be educated about the potential drug interactions between her seizure medications and hormonal contraceptives. Follow-up appointments are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of the chosen contraceptive method and to monitor her menstrual bleeding over time. Ongoing communication between the patient's primary care provider, neurologist, and any relevant specialists will be essential to ensuring her reproductive and neurological health are both well managed.

References

Hirth, J. M., Dinehart, E. E., Lin, Y. L., Kuo, Y. F., & Patel, P. R. (2021). Reasons why young women in the United States choose their contraceptive method. Journal of Women's Health, 30(1), 64–72.

Kirkpatrick, L., Van Cott, A. C., Kazmerski, T. M., & Bravender, T. (2022). Contraception and reproductive health care for adolescent and young adult women with epilepsy. The Journal of Pediatrics, 241, 229–236.

Mansour, D., Hofmann, A., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2021). A review of clinical guidelines on the management of iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia in women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Advances in Therapy, 38, 201–225.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Menorrhagia LARC Hormonal IUD Drug Interactions Seizure Disorder Contraceptive Adherence Antiepileptic Drugs Pelvic Ultrasound Iron-Deficiency Anemia Clinical SOAP Format
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Contraception and Menorrhagia Management: A Case Study. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/contraception-menorrhagia-management-case-study-2178399

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.