This paper examines the challenges faced by a company expanding helicopter pilot training operations to Singapore and Saudi Arabia. It analyzes multiple barriers to cross-cultural business success—including communication styles, language differences, time zone coordination, and cultural norms—and evaluates strategies to overcome them. The paper draws on case examples from American-Japanese and American-Saudi Arabian business interactions to illustrate how adaptation and managerial intervention can help organizations succeed in global ventures. The study concludes that deliberate strategic implementation is essential for companies to maintain competitiveness in international markets while building sustainable relationships with foreign partners and employees.
Enlarging the geographic footprint of a business unit has always been labeled as an expensive and risky concept, and the risks have not subsided in this venture. Currently, globalization is both a developing and equalizing force, but times change and both business markets and business units must adapt to the changing dynamics of current economic globalization, which will significantly impact the manner in which business and training teams operate. A company utilizing a traditional team concept has been forced to adapt to a persistent, changing competitive environment in order to establish positive business growth.
The company sought to increase the mobility of people, financial resources, and ideas in order to introduce new Outside the Contiguous United States (OCONUS) helicopter pilot training business opportunities in both Singapore and Saudi Arabia. The company and its business leadership must compel themselves to work across multiple barriers involving communications, language, culture, time and space, team organization, and ideologies to establish effective dialogue and performance and overcome the pitfalls of conflict resolution.
Understanding the multiple barriers to business success is of crucial importance for effective cross-cultural relationships (Rozkwitalska, 2013). Communications is one of the key barriers that can cause damage to relationships, especially in dealing with interpersonal communications. American culture is more upfront and direct on an issue, while other countries have a norm of addressing issues indirectly, using embedded messages when bringing concerns to a manager's attention (Brett, Behfar & Kern, 2006).
As an example of this type of cultural norm, an American manager discovered several flaws in a system that would significantly disrupt company operations. An employee pointed this out in an email to her American boss and the Japanese team members. Within a counter-culture, this type of action would not have been acceptable (Brett, Behfar & Kern, 2006). In Japanese and Singapore cultures, this action is outside normal procedures and is considered an embarrassment. Both countries have very prideful cultures and are more concerned with saving face than bringing an issue to the forefront.
Nonverbal communication and contextual understanding are essential elements of cross-cultural workplace interactions. The differences in how cultures approach direct criticism or problem reporting stem from deeper values about hierarchy, respect, and interpersonal harmony that require awareness and sensitivity from all parties.
When organizing mobile teams to travel around the world, maintaining virtual communication with these teams presents significant challenges. Coordinating with teams that are hours ahead or hours behind your time zone requires delicate scheduling to ensure the right people are available at the right time and place. Although email communication has improved the speed and effectiveness of asynchronous communications, it can slow down the reaction time to changes in programs.
Miscommunication is high with virtual communication. With typed words, you lose the nonverbal expressions present when communicating face to face. The tone in an individual's voice is not heard when a message is viewed on a screen. Virtual communications remains the easiest way of preventing embarrassment by keeping communications professional (Carpenter, Bauer & Erdogan, 2010). However, this efficiency comes at the cost of reduced interpersonal connection and the inability to immediately clarify misunderstandings through real-time interaction.
Language and cultural differences are top-ranked among the barriers to business success and create certain challenges with intercultural relationships (Zhang & Huang, 2013). Although English is the standard for international business, it can be difficult to understand speakers who are not fluent in the language or who speak with a pronounced accent. The improper use or wrong translation of words can cause frustration between the listener and speaker (Brett, Behfar & Kern, 2006).
Cultural differences can create huge obstacles within working groups, and judging another culture by the values and standards of one's own culture will create friction among the group (Rozkwitalska, 2013). Intercultural competence requires both linguistic proficiency and cultural awareness. A company that employs personnel from their native home with experience in dealing with different cultures or experience in the objective culture will have less difficulty in establishing a good working relationship and future growth within that country.
Four common strategies help to displace barriers: adaptation, structural intervention, managerial intervention, and exit. The company has effectively used adaptation as a way to bridge cultural gaps between a traditional Muslim nation and a Western nation having a direct form of communication. The common denominator in achieving success between the company's aviation training personnel and the Saudi Arabian National Guard has been the embodiment of teamwork and the realization that the training serves to protect countries within the Middle East.
Adaptation serves also to support the company's commitment in communicating between the business unit within the United States and the training team based in Saudi Arabia. For both the training team and the business unit, the barriers of time and space—changes in time designations and geographic displacement—have been mitigated by electronic communications. However, the cultural differences of language and customs of Saudi Arabia create difficulties in aviation training, as many of the Saudi Arabian National Guard pilots are not fluent in English and most are associated with the highest levels of the ruling family, which adds to the training barriers.
In stemming this type of barrier, the company manages to use managerial intervention whereby the training cadre reinforces the training goals from a management level. The company has a vast amount of aviation training experience upon which to draw, and with the right team consistency, mission success is the ultimate end-state. Overcoming barriers to global team management and training ensures the company meets its vision, mission, and values.
The company has established both a strong domestic and foreign foundation with adequate capital, technical expertise, resources, multilingual personnel, support systems, and training programs. More importantly, the company has secured the right strategic partner in Saudi Arabia. However, the long-term barriers of communication, language, and cultural differences may develop friction for the company. This is where it is important for the company to develop and implement strategies to combat these barriers, which will allow the company to continue to compete in overseas training ventures and encourage future company growth and development.
You’re 97% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.