This paper examines the concept of curriculum evaluation as a continuous, holistic assessment process involving all curriculum stakeholders. Drawing on Carl's (1995) definition, the paper outlines what curriculum evaluation addresses — including its impact on students, society, and the economy — and clarifies its purpose: to foster positive change, keep pace with social developments, and improve educational outcomes. The paper then offers practical guidance on how a curriculum facilitator might explain the evaluation process to teachers, emphasizing the importance of framing evaluation positively, outlining clear procedural steps, and broadening teachers' understanding of what evaluation encompasses beyond curriculum content alone.
The paper demonstrates effective use of a foundational definition (Carl, 1995) as an anchor for the entire argument. By returning to this definition throughout, the student links theoretical grounding to practical recommendations — a technique that strengthens academic credibility and shows the ability to apply theory to practice.
The paper opens with a cited definition and a bulleted overview of curriculum evaluation's concerns, followed by a synthesis of its broader purpose. It then pivots to a practical scenario — communicating the evaluation process to teachers — structured in three numbered steps covering rationale, process, and scope. This two-part structure (conceptual foundation + applied guidance) is well suited to education and curriculum studies papers at the undergraduate level.
According to Carl (1995:178), "Curriculum evaluation is a process during which a value determination of the standard and outcome of the relevant curriculum (broad, subject or lesson curriculum) is made. Evaluation should take place on an ongoing basis as well as during and after each of the design, dissemination and implementation phases with a view to making timeous adjustments and determining success."
Curriculum evaluation is typically concerned with the following areas:
The purpose of curriculum evaluation is to help avoid repeating existing mistakes, expand knowledge, involve society in education, and encourage interest in the importance of the curriculum. It also aims to keep pace with social changes, support societies in accepting the results and outcomes of education, and ensure the importance of educational reforms.
From the above information it is clear that curriculum evaluation is a continuous and holistic assessment process that attempts to consider all stakeholders as well as the outcomes of the curriculum. The goals of curriculum development are to foster positive changes that consider what has and has not worked in the past, and to reflect the dynamic contextual environment within which education operates.
First, it is important to explain to teachers why curriculum evaluation is needed. The evaluation facilitator will explain that curriculum evaluation is a necessary process to help foster student growth, and that evaluation is not a negative critical review. Rather, it is intended to recognize progress and to identify areas for future improvement. This framing is important because evaluation has traditionally focused on identifying shortcomings and, for this reason, has caused anxiety and resentment that can impede constructive participation.
Carl, AE 1995: Teacher empowerment through curriculum development: theory into practice. Kenwyn, Cape Town: Juta, p. 178.
Evaluation and assessment: Curriculum evaluation.
The three discussion groups.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.