This paper applies cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis to develop a product strategy for three handheld devices — X5, X6, and X7 — across a four-year period from 2006 to 2009. CVP analysis is presented as a powerful managerial decision-making tool that reveals the relationships among cost, sales volume, and profit. The paper outlines individual strategies for each product based on their respective life-cycle stages, pricing sensitivity, and R&D investment levels. By calculating required sales volumes and optimal price points, the strategy aims to exceed a profit benchmark of $954,830,241 and achieve a target of over $1 million in total profit. The conclusion highlights CVP's utility in making multi-year decisions simultaneously.
Cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis is noted by Cafferky and Wentworth (2010) to be one of the most powerful tools available to managers in their decision-making process. This is due to the fact that it can be used to understand the relationships among cost, volume, and organizational profit. The decisions supported by CVP analysis may include determining which products to sell or manufacture. In this paper, a CVP analysis approach is employed to evaluate strategy across three handheld devices: X5, X6, and X7.
As noted, CVP analysis is an extremely powerful tool in the decision-making process. It is also crucial in the development of product strategy (Horngren, Datar & Foster, 2006). One of its main advantages is that it enables all decisions regarding the three products to be made from a 2006 baseline, rather than waiting until the start of each year to make year-specific decisions.
CVP analysis can be employed in various ways. It can be used to calculate the break-even point or the specific price required for a particular product unit to generate profit. In this paper, however, the primary concern is to develop a strategy that yields strong profits for the company. The profit target is set above $954,830,241 — the benchmark established over the 2006–2009 period — with a goal of achieving over $1 million in profit.
This goal is to be achieved over a four-year period, as indicated in the profit allocation table. The suggested figures are derived from a thorough analysis of prior performance data and are considered attainable. The focus is therefore on building a forward-looking strategy grounded in CVP calculations for each of the three products.
The profit allocation across the three products and the four-year period from 2006 to 2009 is determined after analyzing prior performance results. The suggested figures are structured to be realistic and achievable, with each product contributing to the overall profit target in accordance with its life-cycle stage and market position.
Based on the available information, product X5 has been in the market for three years and its growth is transitioning between the shakeout phase and product maturity. X5 is also price-sensitive, meaning that reducing its price would increase unit sales figures. There is therefore a strategic need to reduce the price in order to drive higher sales volume. By entering the R&D investment level, product price, and target profit into the CVP calculator, the required sales volume to achieve the target profit can be determined. This process is repeated for 2007 before discontinuing the X5 production line, as it is evident that X5 has reached maturity and will not generate meaningful profits beyond that point.
The calculations indicate that the sales volume required to achieve a $100 million profit at a price of $245, with an R&D investment of 30%, is 1,676,190 units. This figure is calculated by dividing total revenue by the unit price.
"X6 quality investment and peak profitability plan"
"X7 growth-stage pricing and R&D recommendations"
CVP analysis has helped in making important decisions across the 2006–2009 period. Using the obtained data, decisions for the entire period can be made in one go, rather than being revisited annually. The analysis also enables the calculation of exact sales volume figures needed to achieve target profit levels at each price point. These sales volume figures are important because they allow for appropriate adjustments to the production process. Optimal price calculations are similarly derived through CVP in order to avoid losses and identify the break-even point for each product. Overall, CVP analysis proves to be an indispensable tool for structured, forward-looking product strategy development.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.