This paper analyzes the character of Dan in Louisa May Alcott's episodic novel Jo's Boys, arguing that he functions as the novel's most dramatically compelling figure despite the absence of a single consistent protagonist. Drawing on key chapters, the paper traces Dan's development from a restless, undisciplined young wanderer on the American frontier to a man whose impulsive act of violence leads to imprisonment and a profound moral reckoning. The analysis examines how Alcott seeds Dan's defining traits — solitude, a peripatetic nature, and a volatile but honorable temperament — across the novel's episodes, and how his tragic final fate retrospectively confirms the character she first sketched in the earlier novel Little Men.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
Jo's Boys by Louisa May Alcott is an episodic novel, which means it does not have a consistent protagonist running through the entire book. However, any reader asked to nominate a main character would probably select Dan, simply because his character is the most broadly dramatic in terms of incident and action. Dan has a complicated and dark character that changes over the course of the novel, allowing him to demonstrate traits both good and bad across various episodes: he is loyal and loving, but also troubled and ultimately violent. This paper examines the dramatic arc of Dan's character and the specific traits that mark each stage of his journey throughout Alcott's novel.
Before discussing Dan's role at the start of Jo's Boys, it is worth noting that the novel is, in fact, a sequel to Alcott's Little Men, which depicted Jo March — the protagonist of Alcott's previous bestseller Little Women — in marriage to Professor Bhaer, running a boys' school. Dan is one of a number of classmates depicted as children in Little Men, and Alcott seems to expect readers to remember glimpses of his childhood self, where he is portrayed as largely undisciplined and given to obstreperous outbursts. In other words, from her earlier depiction of Dan as a child, Alcott appears to have known that self-control and temper would be persistent problems for him.
When we first meet Dan as a young adult in Jo's Boys, he stands in marked contrast to his classmates — some of whom are in college or already in business — by following Horace Greeley's famous advice to "go West, young man" and seeking his fortune amid the boomtowns of the vast unincorporated territories of the American frontier. Chapter One begins by emphasizing Dan's peripatetic nature as his chief trait: we are told that "Dan was a wanderer still; for after the geological researches in South America he tried sheep-farming in Australia, and was now in California looking up mines" (p. 3). Later in the chapter, the now-aged Meg speculates about Dan's restlessness, saying "I want to see Dan settled somewhere. 'A rolling stone gathers no moss,' and at twenty-five he is still roaming the world without a tie to hold him." Jo, described as "always ready to defend the black sheep of her flock," counters: "Dan will find his place at last, and experience is his best teacher. He is rough still but each time he comes home I see a change for the better, and never lose my faith in him. He may never do anything great, or get rich, but if the wild boy makes an honest man, I'm satisfied" (p. 11). This exchange establishes Dan's basic traits before the novel's events bear out Jo's own prediction.
"Dan's solitary psychology and frontier life"
"Murder, prison, and moral reckoning"
The entire arc of Dan's character indicates his traits overall of being a peripatetic, wandering sort, of being a solitary man, and of undergoing a deep crisis of Dostoyevskyan crime and punishment. These traits mark him as one of the more interesting — if undeniably melodramatic — characters in all of Louisa May Alcott's fiction. It is worth noting that the novel closes with a "Positively Last Appearance" of all of Alcott's characters, in which it is recorded that "Dan never married, but lived, bravely and usefully, among his chosen people till he was shot defending them." In other words, Jo's earlier, seemingly fanciful suspicion that Dan might be part Native American may not have been so far from the truth — for that, ultimately, is how and where he died.
You’re 62% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.